You must see this...really. 05/01/2012
5 Comments DemocratsAgainstAgenda21.com 04/13/2012
Yes, some jerk has taken that domain name and is directing people to Obama and Sustainability websites. The world is full of creeps like that and what can I say but that I'm sorry I didn't think of it myself. It didn't occur to me that someone would also want to buy my own name as a domain name. That's the breaks. Who Does Your Sheriff Serve? 04/04/2012
The following was written by Kevin Eggers, Assistant Director, Post Sustainability Institute: The position of Sheriff is an elected position because, in theory, the Sheriff is answerable directly to the people, not a bureaucracy. Like all elected officials, the Sheriff also takes an oath to the Constitution, and is, in theory, bound by the Constitution. In Napa County, our elected Sheriff quit with three years remaining on his term. Rather than having another election, my Napa County Supervisors appointed Sheriff John Robertson to serve out the remaining three years. On March 20, 2012 I had an opportunity to talk personally with Sheriff John Robertson at a Napa Sheriff’s “Coffee with the Cops” Problem Oriented Policing Program (POPP) meeting. What I learned was disturbing. POPP is a variation of the COPS program (Community Oriented Policing Services) adopted by many cities in America. The POPP Mission Statement: “The Mission of the Napa County Sheriff’s Office Problem Oriented Policing Program is to employ non-traditional police methods, in collaboration with our local partners within the local community, to address those issues that affect quality of life of the citizens of the unincorporated areas of Napa County.” At the POPP meeting there were four POPP Sheriff Deputies and Sheriff Robertson. There were only three citizens that attended, myself and two others. This gave me an opportunity to talk with Sheriff Robertson. Within my Napa County General Plan is the statement “the rights of the individual are to be balanced with the rights of the community and needs of the environment” (The definition of communitarianism is “balancing the rights of the individual with the rights of the community”). Sheriff Roberts was familiar with this statement. I asked Sheriff Roberts to define Individual rights and community rights and how they are “balanced.” The first thing Roberts told me is “you know you surrender some of your individual rights to live in the community.” Sheriff Roberts went on telling me “The community is the people…The laws are made by the people within the community…your rights are subject the community laws and regulations…my duty is to serve the community…this is the reason we have councils and committees created by Napa Citizens to create the laws and regulations the entire community lives under.” I told Sheriff Roberts, the “community is government.” Many of the laws and regulations are made by a very few people that, in many cases, are serving their own interests. Also, many of the laws and regulations come as requirements attached to subsidies coming from the state and federal government. People are corrupt at all levels of government. There is no difference between the corruption at the federal, state, and community level of government. Why should my rights be subject to the corruption, simply because government chooses to call itself community? Sheriff Roberts told me to stop thinking “outside the system and work from within the system.” I was told I needed to “join a council or committee and work on changing things from within.” I told Sheriff Roberts “it is impossible for me to join every committee and council and stop the rights being taken away in my community.” Sheriff Roberts told me to “Look around. This is what America is today.” Bottom line, my Napa Sheriff Robertson answers to the bureaucracy, which calls itself the “community.” It’s simple logic that if my Sheriff believes he can “balance” my rights, he implies government (in the name of the community) owns my rights. You can’t “balance” what you don’t own. This is the communitarian totalitarian philosophy many of our public officials have adopted. Under both communism and Nazism, the “community” is used as the instrument of control. Under both systems you have no individual rights to protect you from government. Your duty under both systems is to serve the community, both the good and the corruption in the community. Without individual rights to protect us from the “community,” you could take Napa, California and put it in the middle of the Soviet Union or Nazi Germany. There would be no difference in government philosophy. By the way, Article 29 of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights states that our duty is to serve the "community" and our “rights and freedoms” are subject to the goals of the United Nations (meaning, the globalists behind the United Nations). Also, United Nations Agenda 21 Sustainable Development, as defined in California, calls for “balancing” the “Three Es” of Economy, social Equity, and Environment. The Three Es covers every aspect of life on earth. Again, government can only “balance” what government owns. The globalists behind Agenda 21 Sustainable Development, by their definition of balancing, believe they already own every aspect of our lives. Ask your public officials in your community to define individual rights and community rights. If they imply your rights are balanceable or negotiable because you live in the “community,” tell them “This is America. We are born with our individual rights. You don’t own my rights. You don’t own my Bill of Rights. The community is government. Government can’t balance or negotiate my rights away. You are a public servant that has taken a sworn oath to our Constitution. Your duty is to protect the individual rights of every citizen in America.” WELCOME TO THE SMART HOME. Our local newspaper, the Santa Rosa Press Democrat, (some of us call it the Depressed Democrat), ran an article on March 30, 2012 about how Comcast Corporation, the cable provider for the area, is losing market share because people are watching videos online for free or using streaming services. So Comcast is 'looking for new products that can add to the bottom line,' according to their spokesman. What is it? Devices that operate home video cameras that can be viewed remotely, sensors that send a text when a door is opened, automation services that can control appliances remotely, and voices that tell you to take out the trash. Security systems through your cable provider. They say that since they're already in your home they might as well offer the service. You'll have access to that video for a month and then they'll store it for a year on their servers. Sound good to you? You know you'll forget it's there. You know you'll get used to it. You know you'll be conditioned to spy and be spied upon. You know it can be used to surveil you. You know they'll have a voice in your home. Well, maybe not right away, but awfully soon. Why? Because, it says in the article: "People can do so much with their smartphones and we're so used to doing things immediately." Because, they say: "People are really embracing the concept of a fully automated home." Who else is doing it? Time Warner Cable--they call it IntelligentHome. It's so much classier than Smart Home, don't you think? Besides they didn't think of it first. And Xfinity. And ADT. It's nationwide. You'll be clamoring for it. That's how they do it, right? It's just a product and they know you want it, and they just make it available to you. Because you asked for it. You asked for it. We talked about IBM's vital connection to the Nazi effort to inventory and control all human beings considered 'inferior' to its master race. Yes, IBM made the machines, and punch cards for those machines, that tabulated the information detailed on the tattoo'd arms of millions of prisoners. Yes, IBM knew what was going on in Germany and regularly sent American maintenance personnel to the Nazi Third Reich to keep those machines running smoothly. Yes, IBM created a fully owned German subsidiary to avoid the 'trading with the enemy' prohibitions by the US Congress. And yes, IBM is still partnering with the enemy. When you read the information below, just think to yourself how easy it will be to cut you off from your assets. Just one click. Here's the latest from their website (thanks to Debra Hamilton, a fantastic researcher, for the tip): http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/36290.wss You will never need a password again. Your biological makeup is the key to your individual identity, and soon, it will become the key to safeguarding it. You will no longer need to create, track or remember multiple passwords for various log-ins. Imagine you will be able to walk up to an ATM machine to securely withdraw money by simply speaking your name or looking into a tiny sensor that can recognize the unique patterns in the retina of your eye. Or by doing the same, you can check your account balance on your mobile phone or tablet. Each person has a unique biological identity and behind all that is data. Biometric data – facial definitions, retinal scans and voice files – will be composited through software to build your DNA unique online password. Referred to as multi-factor biometrics, smarter systems will be able to use this information in real-time to make sure whenever someone is attempting to access your information, it matches your unique biometric profile and the attempt is authorized. To be trusted, such systems should enable you to opt in or out of whatever information you choose to provide. Mind reading is no longer science fiction From Houdini to Skywalker to X-Men, mind reading has merely been "wishful thinking" for science fiction fans for decades, but their wish may soon come true. IBM scientists are among those researching how to link your brain to your devices, such as a computer or a smartphone. If you just need to think about calling someone, it happens. Or you can control the cursor on a computer screen just by thinking about where you want to move it. Scientists in the field of bioinformatics have designed headsets with advanced sensors to read electrical brain activity that can recognize facial expressions, excitement and concentration levels, and thoughts of a person without them physically taking any actions. Within 5 years, we will begin to see early applications of this technology in the gaming and entertainment industry. Furthermore, doctors could use the technology to test brain patterns, possibly even assist in rehabilitation from strokes and to help in understanding brain disorders, such as autism. Note: Everything in Blue and Red on this post is directly copied from the IBM website. Just in case you've been in a cave for the last few years and haven't heard about this let me fill you in. The human genome has been 'mapped.' That means that lots of DNA has been collected from humans and identified. So what? According to the Council for Responsible Genetics: More likely, however, even broader monopolies may be given to those who have already patented genes or will do so soon. The human genome project has made clear that corporations that have already claimed genes as their own have, in fact, laid claim to a higher percentage of the entire human genome than they at first realized. Looking at the four leading private companies who patent genes, about 750 human genes have been patented by them so far and applications for about 20,000 more are pending. In the case that the pending patents are all awarded (which is unlikely, as many will prove to be redundant), those four private companies could own half of the human genome. OK, so what? you ask. Well, the latest thing is to spit into a cup and send it off to be analyzed at a lab---23 AND ME---so that you can find out your ancestry. It sucks at that. For instance it can tell you that you have Eastern European ancestry, maybe drop a little bomb in your life if you turn out to have had a Jewish ancestor and that surprises you for some reason. But so what? Oh, you want to know if you're going to die of heart disease at a young age? You want to know if you have a genetic disease and shouldn't breed? Now, this post goes real well with one I did a couple of days ago--one about the Nazis. The Nazis did experiments with human beings and also were terribly concerned, obsessed, with eugenics. Eugenics was the study of race and involved identification of different racial characteristics in order to purge the world of the inferior races. Back to today. When all of this focus on ancestry started up in the 90's I was very concerned about it. Suddenly everyone was on-line posting their family tree and researching their history. Very nice. And convenient. The Nazis had to do all of that work on their own. Now you're doing it for them. Who owns 23 AND ME? Anne Wojcicki. Who? The wife of Sergey Brin. Who? The founder and owner of GOOGLE. Google is heavily invested in 23 AND ME. What does 23 AND ME do with your data? They keep it. Store it. Analyze it. Inventory and control. Remember? What is UN Agenda 21? It inventories and controls everything. Including you. What will they do with it? Whatever they want. DID THE NAZI'S LOSE THE WAR? What companies survived the war, thrived during the war, and participate in UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development now? Here are just a few. Siemens is a big one. Nearly bankrupt right before World War II, Siemens profited by Hitler's generous offer of slave labor from the concentration camps. What do they do now? Siemens makes solar panels, renewables as biofuel, algae, and other alternatives. Did Siemens make your solar panels? IBM--International Business Machines, an American company, was forbidden by US law to trade with the enemy during WWII. That didn't stop them though, they created a wholly owned subsidiary in Germany and proceeded to create the punch card system that correlated with the numbers tattooed on prisoners' arms. Those numbers were keyed to whether the person was to be shot immediately (after being tattooed), sent to a number-coded prison labor camp, or sent for medical experimentation. IBM knew exactly what was happening to those prisoners, and regularly sent American employees to service the machines and bring American-made punch cards. BAYER. Yes, kindly Bayer, maker of your aspirin, is a Nazi company. They still deny that a Jew, Arthur Eichengrun, first synthesized aspirin. Krupp (Thysssen-Krupp), the Nazi munitions maker now makes your coffee pots, elevators, knives and, well, look around your house. Hmmm, energy efficient! General Electric--GE, part owner of Krupp (purchased before WWII) during the war, manipulated prices of raw minerals used in making munitions so that it could benefit from higher costs to the allies. What do they own now? Energy, healthcare, and media are their primary assets. What don't they own? Not much. What about that propaganda machine? Pretty powerful. FORD/GM, owned Opel Motor Cars and built the trucks and jeeps for the Nazis during the war. General Motors built the engines for the fighter jets and bombers used by the Luftwaffe. Where did the Nazis go? They came here. Through the Rat Lines, provided by the Vatican, they were given safe passage to the United States. Many of them were scientists. Nuclear scientists, jet propulsion engineers, medical researchers, biologists, chemists, physicists. So what? UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development is implemented worldwide to inventory and control all land, all water, all minerals, all plants, all construction, all animals, all human beings, and all means of production. In the world. Oh no, they wouldn't do a thing like that, would they? YES. How do I know? On March 16, 2012, President Obama signed an Executive Order allowing the Federal Government to confiscate all food, water, transportation, means of production, and labor in the United States. In PEACE time as well as in time of WAR. Read it yourself---click above. MARTIAL LAW. Is it hot in here or is it just me? Is UN Agenda 21 in Canada? 03/13/2012
You bet it is. Here's an excerpt from the Canadian government's own website ENVIRONMENT CANADA Sustainable Development: Sustainable development is about meeting the needs of today without compromising the needs of future generations. It is about improving standard of living by protecting human health, conserving the environment, using resources efficiently and advancing long-term economic competitiveness. It requires the integration of environmental, economic and social priorities into policies and programs and requires action at all levels - citizens, industry, and governments. Environment Canada released the first Progress Report on the Federal Sustainable Development Strategy (FSDS) on June 16, 2011. This first Progress Report describes actions taken to implement the requirements under the Federal Sustainable Development Act since the tabling of the FSDSin October 2010. It focuses on progress made on setting up the systems needed to implement the FSDS and lays the foundation for future reporting by outlining how results will be measured and shared using the Canadian Environmental Sustainability Indicators. Like the FSDS itself, progress reports are part of a long-term 'plan, do, check, and improve' management approach geared to making environmental decision-making more transparent and accountable over time. The FSDS was tabled on October 6th, 2010. For the first time, Canadians will see, all in one place, the Government of Canada’s environmental sustainability priorities and our progress in achieving them. The FSDS presents a detailed description of federal government activities to achieve environmental sustainability. The Strategy also commits to strengthening the guidelines for strategic environmental assessments by federal departments which help integrate environmental considerations related to economic and social decision-making. The Office of Greening Government Operations provides a series of guidelines to help departments and agencies implement and report progress on the Greening Government Operations targets for Theme IV of the Strategy. The FSDS is mandated by the Federal Sustainable Development Act (the Act), which received Royal Assent on June 26, 2008. The Act responds to a number of international commitments Canada has made to produce such a strategy, including at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in 1992 and at the 2002 World Summit on Sustainable Development in Johannesburg, South Africa. The purpose of the Act is "to provide the legal framework for developing and implementing a Federal Sustainable Development Strategy that will make environmental decision-making more transparent and accountable to Parliament". Public consultations were undertaken by the Sustainable Development Office at Environment Canada from March 15, 2010 to July 12, 2010. Find information here regarding the Public Consultation on the Federal Sustainable Development Strategy (PDF; 29 KB). I'll bet those 'public consultations' were Delphi meetings where the public was invited to 'give their opinion' on FSDS. Yep, Canadians are caught in the same miserable trap as everyone else. But Canadians are fighting back. Stop UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development in Calgary, Vancouver, Ottawa, Edmonton, Montreal, Toronto, in all of the provinces. KICK ICLEI OUT OF CANADA. From ICLEI Canada's website: ICLEI's growing membership is comprised of over 1200 cities, towns, counties and their associations, there are currently 33 Members in Canada:
Our funders include national and subnational governments, international organizations, foundations and associations, and municipal governments including: Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) - ICLEI is partnered with FCM to deliver the Partners for Climate Protection Campaign. FCM leads the fund raising activities under this partnership. Natural Resources Canada (NRCAN) - ICLEI has worked in collaboration with NRCan on a variety of projects. Canadian Municipalities - ICLEI Canada has worked under contract with many local governments from across Canada, large or small and urban or rural:
Associations of Local Governments - ICLEI Canada also work with local government associations, such as:
Environment Canada - ICLEI has worked in collaboration with the federal government on a variety of projects. Oooh baby. America2050.org here we come. High-speed rail owned and operated by the Chinese throughout the US. "Win-win" according to our government. Roads, sewer systems, and water systems will be owned by the Chinese. Remember Debt for Nature? Debt for infrastructure. Take a look at these blog posts http://www.democratsagainstunagenda21.com/1/post/2011/11/this-just-inchinese-takeover-of-our-telecom-grid.html and http://www.democratsagainstunagenda21.com/1/post/2011/11/did-i-say-that.html I can see it now. We lose our rural roads--pulverized to gravel. Our private vehicle usage is limited, restricted, and taxed. Our bus service will be declared insolvent and not cost effective. High-speed rail will be the only way to travel. Fully owned and operated by the Chinese. In our country. Airport-style searches. Restricted use tickets. Overcrowding. Limited line service. Why? Because we can't maintain our own infrastructure? Can we maintain our sovereignty? Just wondering. From China Daily: Yuan Ning, president of China Construction America, a wholly owned subsidiary of China State Construction Engineering Corporation, said the perfect way for China and the US to collaborate is through public-private partnership for infrastructure projects. PPP is a government service or private business venture that is funded and operated through a partnership between the government and one or more private sector companies. Yuan said Chinese companies working through PPP with the US government and private sectors is a "win-win solution". Robert Hormats, US Under Secretary of State for economic, energy and agricultural affairs, agrees that PPP is a good way to work with Chinese companies on infrastructure projects. "Chinese investment can be really helpful. We would love to have more of that and we will be pursuing that dialogue with the Chinese," Hormats told China Daily after a business event in New York. Chinese companies not only see the opportunity but also have shown a commitment to be a part of this development. China State Construction Engineering Corporation recently said it will invest $2 billion in the next few years in the US market for PPP infrastructure projects, mergers and acquisitions and residential projects. Joe Catapano, a project manager with China Construction America, said the expertise and capital Chinese companies can provide are important. "The key issue is money. It doesn't seem the United States government is willing to spend money (on building infrastructure)," said Catapano, who has 12 years of engineering experience in New York and California. "High-speed rail is definitely something we can learn from China. We don't have any of that in the US, anywhere," he added. This is the source article: China "partnering" with US and giving money to build infrastructure projects in the US: http://usa.chinadaily.com.cn/business/2012-02/15/content_14614219.htm ONE BAY AREA: BAY OF TRICKS 02/15/2012
ASSOCIATION OF BAY AREA GOVERNMENTS ATTEMPTS TO MEET SECRETLY WITH ACTIVISTS If you've been following our actions at the ONE BAY AREA meetings with other groups, including East Bay Tea Party, 9-12 groups, property rights groups, and other Tea Parties, you know that we have deeply upset the game the Government (Association of Bay Area Governments--ABAG, and Metropolitan Transportation Commission--MTC in league with their public/private partners, Silicon Valley Partnership and Greenbelt Alliance) is playing. The Delphi game is to pretend, and get you to believe, that your input is solicited to craft the plan when in fact it is already set up before you show up. This is a Regional Plan, a stepping stone to Mega Regions and then to Global Government. We haven't been going along to get along. So out of the hundreds of people who attended their 'workshops,' in the 9 county Bay Area, out of the 7.5 million people in the Bay Area who would have questions about this plan if they knew about it, just four of us have been invited to a private meeting with ABAG-MTC. Who are we? Heather Gass, East Bay Tea Party Leader; Mimi Steel, 9-12 Leader; Carol Tomlinson, North Bay Patriots Leader; and me. Here's the email they sent: Ms. Koire: The Executive Directors of MTC and ABAG are extending an invitation to meet with them at the MetroCenter to discuss issues and matters brought up at the Winter 2012 PlanBayArea workshops. There are three possible meeting times - one will be selected based on availability of invitees. Please reply to accept the invitation and indicate your preferred meeting date. Thursday, Feb 16, between 1:00 pm and 2:00 pm Friday, Feb 17, between 3:00 pm and 5:00 pm Friday, 3/2/12, between 9:00 am 11:00 am regards, JoAnna Bullock Senior Grant Administrator, Urban Planner JoAnna Bullock JoAnnaB@abag.ca.gov Association of Bay Area Governments MetroCenter 101 Eighth Street Oakland, CA 94607 I had been checking into the American Planning Association propaganda and saw that they have now put out a seminar on how to handle us. That's you and me. So this is what I sent back: You must have gotten this guide from the APA "Preparation Second, be proactive Reach out to groups likely to oppose Request a meeting with them to listen to concerns and ideas Do not try to change their minds –collect their input Encourage them to provide you with materials (books, websites, etc.) Research local activist networks" But Heather wanted to get more information. I'm glad she did. Here's her exchange: Ms. Bullock, I have several questions about this invitation that need to be cleared up before I consider attending. Will this be a publicly noticed meeting subject the Brown Act and open to the public, Executive Session or an informal (private) meeting not subject to the Brown Act? Who are the invitees? Is this open to the public or to just a handful of people? Which MTC/ABAG Executive Directors will be in attendance? Also, I am unclear as to the purpose of this meeting? What “Issues and Matters” will be discussed. I would like an agenda for the meeting. Heather Gass ------------- Ms. Gass, This is a invitation to meet informally with the executive director of MTC, Steve Hemminger and the executive director of ABAG, Ezra Rapport. The invitation was extended to the following attendees of the PBA public workshops: Carol Thomlison Rosa Koire Mimi Steele This will be an informal meeting, not a public meeting - no elected officials will be present so it is not subject to the Brown Act. The purpose of the meeting is to provide an opportunity to those that expressed issues and dissent at the PBA workshops to speak directly with the executive directors. The executive directors prefer no agenda - this is opportunity for open dialogue. regards, JoAnna Bullock Senior Grant Administrator, Urban Planner How 'bout that, folks? Now they want an 'open dialogue' outside of the eyes and ears of the public and for the sole purpose of finding out about us. FORGET ABOUT IT. NO GOOD GERMANS. | And the winner is...
Winners and losers. Guess which one we'll be? Need a hint? 1984. Two wars still going on after almost 10 years... ArchivesMay 2012 CategoriesAll |
RSS Feed