It’s pretty clear that the French working class is feeling Taxed Enough Already. What’s going on in Paris, and Amsterdam, and in other cities and rural areas where the people feel so powerless and so ignored that they would destroy property and risk injury? Is this an anarchist movement or a desperate effort to be taken seriously by people who refuse to go along with the UN Agenda 21 austerity programs? The people who are fighting The Plan may not know that they’re fighting not just carbon taxes, not just austerity plans, not just floods of immigrants dependent on government assistance and willing to undercut wages, not just vehicle miles traveled taxes, or fees to enter cities, or extreme disparities in income fueled by mega-corporations and their plans to level the world’s economies—-no they may be unaware that everything they’re fighting is what we fight all over the world: UN Agenda 21 Sustainable Development. People only fight like this when their survival is at stake. They are rioting to break the stranglehold of arrogance and power that is forceably implementing UN Agenda 21. That power is erasing their sovereignty. This is a mega-corporate plan designed to DISRUPT your economy and to break down existing systems and worker protections. The mega-corporations want low wages, ready workers, no borders, harmonized laws in every jurisdiction, and REGIONAL GOVERNANCE so you will have no vote and no voice.
WE NEED TO HELP THE FRENCH TO BECOME AWARE THAT EVERYTHING THEY ARE FIGHTING IS THE SAME THING. NAME IT. Le COMITE 21
My speeches have been translated into French, Italian, German, Spanish, Portuguese and other languages out of a need for information. Awareness is growing. Brexit and the possibility of other nations, Italy?, leaving the EU may widen the crack in that seemingly impenetrable wall of silence that surrounds UN Agenda 21.
Remember the Agenda is “the Agenda for the 21st century”—-Agenda 2030 is a 30 year milestone into that 21st century plan; not a replacement for it. The United Nations wants you to believe that Agenda 21 was eclipsed by and superseded by Agenda 2030. No, don’t be misled. Agenda 2030’s Sustainable Development Goals are a progress marker, a future milestone marker for Agenda 21.
REFUSE TO COOPERATE. REFUSE TO COLLABORATE. SPEAK OUT.
NAME IT. FIGHT UN AGENDA 21.
In January 2015, the road through Paradise, CA was narrowed, put on a “road diet” in a typical Agenda 21 redesign of the small town’s main street. You’ve seen this in your town too, when the four lane main streets are restricted to two lanes, one in each direction, with bike lanes and bulb outs at corners and mid block. They call it Smart Growth and Complete Streets.
ASSORTED TWEETS CULLED FROM EXTREMISTS WHO EXEMPLIFY THIRD ORDER CHANGE. HOW TO FLIP A COUNTRY. UN AGENDA 21.
Michelle @deromi763 Aug 11
It’s still hard for me to wrap my head around how quickly I can change my feelings about someone I’ve known my whole life.. when finding out they’re a Trump supporter and realizing I’ve never really known them at all.. and now I no longer want to. 506 replies 1,230 retweets 6,600 likes
Peter Strzok @notpeterstrzok Aug 13
I have been fired for expressing my personal opinion in private texts about a dictator that history will soon deem not only a Russian asset but an unhinged madman threatening the sovereignty of the United States of America.9,584 replies 53,756 retweets 189,837 likes
Cousin AngelaVerified account @angela_rye Jul 20
A real question for the @GOP: so, y’all really gonna be more pissed at @BarackObama for trying to give you healthcare than you are at @realDonaldTrump for trying to give your whole country away to Russia?648 replies 7,366 retweets 23,659 likes
Michael AvenattiVerified account @MichaelAvenatti Jul 16
This is what happens when we have a president that does not even understand the rule of law, let alone follow it. His conduct is disgraceful and he should be ashamed. Enough is Enough. This nightmare for the United States should be brought to an end. #FightClub #Basta2,083 replies 19,336 retweets 68,520 likes
Lisa Maldonado@LaMujerObrerajust your average labor boss,working for the revolution, all about the class struggle and waiting for the great leap forward.
There is plenty I don't like about Trump. I worry that he is a globalist in sheep's clothing with his Workforce Education plans and his 'trade above all' rhetoric. But Trump is the president, and the behavior of the press and the Democrat party is beyond outrageous. It is dangerous. Watching Trump say that he didn't mean it when he said that he didn't think Russia 'meddled' with the election was painful. I personally believe that Russia attempted to manipulate public opinion during the 2016 election and that this wasn't the first time. It was, however, the first time that the ruling globalist class lost an election in decades, or ever, so of course now's the time to scream about the Russians.
If this national nervous breakdown continues into the midterms, which it is sure to do, I think that there will be violence. I believe people are being driven to insanity by this viciousness and tension. Listen to Tucker Carlson of Fox News analyze the situation.
Yes, I do watch Fox News. Go ahead: Shoot me.
Push back from Democrats who have absolutely had it with the vitriol, aggression, and lies of the Democrat party. I posted this when the Democrat fundraising machine was trying to cash in on the murders in Orlando.
It's finally getting through that it's all about the votes and nothing else.
Do you remember when Kathy Griffin made a video of herself holding a stylized head of President Trump? Most of us thought that had ruined her career. Nope. Take a look at this Seattle events magazine announcing an upcoming Kathy Griffin show. I think you'll be interested to see the progression / regression of opinion as laid out by this announcement. This is far more than a left/right divide. This is an indicator of the difficulty in speaking truth to people who have tacitly agreed to destroy anyone who doesn't go along to get along, and to celebrate anyone who does.
I've seen all of your presentations on the internet. You're the best!! I'm disseminating your information here in Munich. Do you plan to visit Germany for information spreading? Your brilliant presentations opened my eyes to see clearly what is happening in Germany. I also managed to wake up exile-Americans here in Germany.
As for your article, well, the open data platforms on the municipal level are allowed to do what Google, Facebook, Amazon are doing and have done: Spying on you, collecting data and selling your most private data. It's called open data - open government - open society. The European General Data Protection Regulation enables communities, local authorities and municipalities to collect, profile and sell all private data of citizens without their consent or knowing whereas at the same time the GDPR regulates the same activities when committed by small and medium sized businesses. So business is forced to buy our data from the open data platforms of the local authorities.
Here, in Germany, there's the German Sustainability Strategy where they, once more, commit themselves to agenda 21 and agenda 2030 respectively. There a project called "Smarter Together", a part of the project "Horizon 2020". They're doing research and implementing it in the living labs. Vienna, Munich and Lyon are representing "lighthouse smart cities". Then they'll replicate the smart city stuff and sell it to "follower smart cities". Systematically they're packaging, standardising, normalising smart cities around the world, so they can reach global government or a big brother police state step by step.
Folks, please, we must persist in our efforts to fight against agenda 21 / agenda 2030 / sustainability, before it's too late. As Rosa said, everybody should do something, it's better than doing nothing!
Greetings from Munich, Deeply Concerned German
Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Facebook, addressed the European Parliament a few days ago. I suggest that you watch the CSPAN video below in order to hear the questions that those on the EU Parliament asked Zuckerberg, and how he didn't answer them. This is important. Facebook has hired thousands of people to look at content and to purge it. As Nigel Farage noted, how is it that he has lost 25% of his Facebook followers since the purge? Is conservative speech hate speech? UN Agenda 21 is referred to as a 'conspiracy theory' by the mainstream press. Will those of us talking about this REAL CONSPIRACY FACT be removed from Facebook?
Facebook has grown in power and size and monopoly to the point where it should be a regulated public utility or disbanded. We do not want private individuals, kingly autocratic technocrats, to be determining what is 'too political' or 'too extreme.' We do not want a MINISTRY OF TRUTH with the power to purge speech from the public discourse. This is a dangerous violation of our rights. If you say that you want a closed border are you a racist? If you question Hillary Clinton's truthfulness are you a sexist? If you have concerns about loss of private property rights are you an entitlement abuser? If you try to block regulatory takings are you someone who has unjustly gained wealth? If you object to UN Agenda 21 are you a conspiracy theorist advocating for fake news?
Ask the MINISTRY OF TRUTH.
Click this link for the English translation and streamlined meeting on CSPAN. The YouTube video below does not fully translate the French, Italian, and German speakers into English.
In 2013 ICLEI, presumably in response to activists all over the United States exposing the global organization in their towns, removed its USA member list from its websites. Now these cities are again listed on the ICLEI-USA website. This may mean that cities are no longer being pressured by Americans to drop their affiliation with this international group that purports to be a collection of 'local governments for sustainability.' In fact, ICLEI is the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives and was created by the UN in 1990 to implement UN Agenda 21 worldwide.
Headquartered in Bonn, Germany, it is a lobbying and policy group that is intended to influence and change local governmental policies related to all aspects of human life. It designs and sells systems that monitor, report, and control water and energy usage. This information is then shared.
By concentrating power in cities this group circumvents requirements for ratification of international treaties and gives the illusion of local control. ICLEI is structured as a parallel government but has no transparency because it is a private non-profit.
In fact the cities then ally in regional conglomerates which break jurisdictional boundaries and will destroy local control. These regional boards are unelected and not answerable to the citizenry.
Ultimately this facilitates global governance by invalidating individual cities, counties, states, and nations with agreements and interwoven systems to which they are bound by contract: public private partnerships.
To see ICLEI's list of American cities that are members click here
UN AGENDA 21: KNOW IT WHEN YOU SEE IT. FIGHT IT. GET ICLEI OUT OF YOUR CITY.
HERE'S A SAMPLE OF THE CURRENT MEMBERSHIP...WHICH ICLEI HAS ALPHABETIZED BY CITY NAME TO MAKE IT HARDER FOR YOU TO SEE HOW MANY CITIES IN YOUR STATE ARE MEMBERS
Alameda County, CA
American Canyon, CA
Arlington County, VA
Community Office of Resource Efficiency
Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments
Broward County, FL
Central New York Regional Planning and Development Board
Chatham County, NC
Chittenden Country Regional Planning Commission
Chula Vista, CA
Coconut Creek, FL
IS YOUR CITY A MEMBER? CHECK HERE
Mark Zuckerberg, CEO and founder of Facebook is testifying right now to the Congress of the United States. His demeanor is earnest and he professes naivete regarding the use of personal information by third parties. He talks about facial recognition software and artificial intelligence (AI) and suggests that his company is on the cusp of an unknown realm. This serves UN Agenda 21.
UN Agenda 21 is INVENTORY AND CONTROL. UN Agenda 21 is INFORMATION GATHERING AND SHARING. The UN Agenda 21 document itself states in every clause that data sharing is integral to making the plan functional.
Your data, your information, your DNA, your face, your family ties, your political affiliations, your emotional state---all of this is held privately by individual corporations with a fiscal model that involves selling advertising and information to third parties. You are the source and you give your data freely. Loss of privacy is the price you pay. That is the message.
Have you researched your ancestry with 23 and Me or another company? You are giving your DNA to a corporation connected with Google which will keep it indefinitely. How will it be used? You have no control over that.
If you are one of the billions of users of Facebook you have lost control of your own face. Your own personal data, your own personal history, your life. The workers at Google, at Facebook, at CISCO etc are young and eager. These young people are competitive to the extent that they will pursue science to any end, to any task, in any direction to which they are assigned. They are intoxicated with the potential of technology and have no limits. They literally have no idea where this technology will lead them. They follow it through the maze to the Minotaur.
This is UN Agenda 21. Inventory and control of all aspects of life. Whether these major corporations are working with governments or will themselves awaken to a power far greater than any individual government, they are setting the stage for a global totalitarian state. Mega-corporations with all the money, and all the power, and all of the information will use it. Mark Zuckerberg says he wants to use it for 'good.' How does he define 'good,' and, more importantly, why is he is a position to decide that?
Remember. Globalization is the standardization of all systems. It is the inventory and control of all land, all water, all minerals, all plants, all animals, all construction, all means of production, all energy, all education, all law, all information, and all human beings in the world.
Refuse to collaborate. Refuse to cooperate. Name it. Fight it. This is UN Agenda 21.
Thank you to everyone who has emailed us to find out if we are OK. Yes, we did evacuate but the fire was stopped about 10 blocks from our house.
The first night of the fire was unusual. A hot wind that you might associate with a Southern California 'Santa Ana' began in the early evening. Santa Rosa usually has warm days and cold nights so this was a remarkable event that I haven't seen in the 15 years that I've lived in the North Bay. It was the night before Columbus Day/Indigenous Peoples Day and you could hear parties going on in the warm gusty night air. Our outdoor patio umbrellas blew over. Tree limbs on the redwoods behind the house came down.
Throughout the night Kay heard sirens and couldn't sleep. In the early morning she went outside and smelled the smoke. As she turned on TV to check the news the service went out. We sat in our car and listened to radio, and heard that Santa Rosa was burning. Although we weren't in the official evacuation area we started to pack the truck with family photos, paintings, and other things of value to us. Overhead dark smoke clouds began to cover the sky. By the time we were ready to leave I walked out to the driveway and was alarmed to see that the entire northern skyline was dark black. I felt a surge of panic and we jumped in the truck and drove west to the ocean. As we drove toward the coast the smoke did not lift but actually seemed to get thicker. When we reached the waves on Point Reyes' South Beach we saw the smoke covering the shore and extending far into the ocean. Even the closest waves were obscured in a yellow haze. We turned southward to the East Bay looking in vain for clear air, but the entire bay area was covered.
Later in the day I began to get calls and notes from friends who had lost their homes or feared that their homes were lost. One had put out fires around his Oakmont home and then left quickly in his motorhome. He found out later that the home was saved but another home that he rented out had completely burned. The tension continued for days.
When I drove back up to check the house and get more things a couple of days later I regretted it. The smoke was thick, yellow, and came right down to the ground. It was difficult to see across the street. The fire came right down into town and had burned entire neighborhoods and the hillsides for miles around. Bright wild flames charged across the wilderness areas and left black hillsides in their wake.
Now that the fires are out we have seen hundreds of acres of land scarred with destroyed structures, blackened trees, lone fireplaces, and melted cars. The areas that burned in Santa Rosa range from million dollar homes in the Fountaingrove hillsides to the modest Coffey Park neighborhood to the trailer park that now looks like a melted mass of twisted metal. Although I've been sent someone's YouTube video showing the northeast area of Santa Rosa as a targeted Agenda 21 'development area' or a 'redevelopment area', this is incorrect. What that map shows is about 12 individual development sites i.e. home sites that were currently permitted for home construction.
The question is "Will the destruction of single family homes across the city spark more Smart Growth high density development that can be pushed through with Delphi meetings pressuring the populace?" "Will this fire be the excuse to refuse building permits for single family homes?" "Will rural lands controlled by Pacific Gas & Electric, non-profit land trusts, and individuals be better managed in the future to clear brush and dead trees?"
There is an investigation into the source of the fires. Along with all of you we have concerns and look forward to more information. All investigations and all sources must be considered.
As I watched President Trump's speech today, I cheered. I think he gets it. After Angela Merkel's comment that the Paris Climate Accord is a "key agreement that shapes globalization" it is clear to all who listen that United Nations treaties and agreements are about systems inventory and control. The Paris Climate Accord is not about whether the planet heats up another 1/10 of 1 percent in 50 years. This agreement is about crippling the ability of the United States to recover from years of a collapsed economy and loss of individual certainty. This agreement is about eroding national boundaries and national sovereignty all over the world, and about strengthening the power of the United Nations and non-governmental organizations.
Although the Paris Climate Accord was never brought to the Senate for ratification it is important that it be rejected by President Trump. Agenda 21 was also not a treaty and was not brought before the Congress, except obliquely, but it was 'de facto' made binding by President Clinton who implemented it administratively and by federal pressure on the States. President Obama and Hillary Clinton had every intention of implementing the Paris Climate Accord through the usual channels: federal pressure, grants, regulations, restrictions, HUD/EPA/DOT grants and lawsuits, and bogus non-profits working the grassroots.
During President Trump's speech today he mentioned American sovereignty several times and referred to the Accord as a redistribution of wealth that favored other nations and debilitated American business. That it clearly does do so is apparent in the treatment of China and India as "developing countries" who are exempt from regulations and controls for years---years in which they will continue to grossly pollute while producing cheap goods for export to the United States.
I searched President Obama's speeches for mention of American sovereignty. I didn't find it. What I did find was his address to the United Nations General Assembly in the fall of 2016 stating that we in America 'must bind ourselves to international rules' and not fall prey to 'nationalism.' The term 'nationalism' is now equated with Hitler or isolationism. What we are protecting is not just a sense that our country has self-interests both social and economic, but our Constitution, our rule of law, our sovereignty.
By refusing to abide by the Paris Climate Accord President Trump is sending a message to those of us who have fought consistently against UN Agenda 21's message of globalization/One World Government. It takes time and effort to destroy the economy of one of the world's wealthiest nations. We are hugely in debt and struggle with homelessness, youth who feel hopeless about their future, polarization of the races exacerbated by compressed Smart Growth mega-cities, more and more drug use...we need help.
The presidency is not a popularity contest. Whether we like his personality or not is irrelevant. What is important is the health and welfare of our nation, and our freedom.
THE PARIS CLIMATE ACCORD IS UN AGENDA 21.
We oppose rent control for a number of reasons. We support needs-based government rent subsidies like Section 8 and believe that the program should be better funded and more efficiently managed.
Rent control forces private individuals to subsidize other individuals regardless of need for an indefinite period of time. Rather than provide services for its residents, the city will penalize property owners because the city is financially unable or unwilling to pay for housing assistance services.
Property owners are referred to as greedy if they make a profit on their business but the fact that there are major costs and risks associated with property ownership is ignored.
Rent control law often exempts buildings constructed after 1995. Most small local rental property owners have older housing stock and will be disproportionately penalized by this law. The city may create arbitrary cut-offs at owner-occupied triplexes which creates a new class of property and a new issue for valuation and sale of rental property.
Rent control makes property ownership prohibitive for existing owners and reduces their property values. Transfer of multiple small parcels to one single major developer like Enterprise Community Development or LIHC is then much easier for adherents of UN Agenda 21 stack and pack housing.
Rent control does not create more affordable housing but instead encourages people to stay frozen for years in one place.
Property owners will be more likely to raise rents every year to the maximum allowable by law. When tenants move out property owners will raise the new rent as high as possible knowing that this may be the only chance they have to adjust to current market rates.
Properties that are rent controlled are less likely to be well-maintained because the property owner's expenses are rising but the rents stay the same. We don't see counties offering to freeze property taxes on rent controlled units, nor will the cities freeze water and garbage rates.
The city will create a layer of bureaucracy and a Rent Board. They plan to charge owners a certain amount per unit per year. Half of this will be passed to the tenants. Rent Boards tend to be aggressive with property owners and lenient with tenants even in cases of long term sublet arrangements where the tenant leaves and sublets to another for more money. In Berkeley this scenario is allowed to continue for a minimum of 4 years and the property owner must prove that the tenant has 'no intention' of moving back into the unit---impossible to prove.
Here in Santa Rosa there are builders with land who would like to construct apartment buildings but are blocked by the Planning Department. Reasons given have varied from not being close enough to a direct bus line to the train station, to not being within the specific plans of the downtown redevelopment areas. Although redevelopment was ended the Santa Rosa General Plan rezoned large areas of the city. Funding, politics, and building restrictions have blocked construction of housing that could be affordable.
There is an ideology espoused by rent control supporters that housing is a right and that this right should be enabled by private individuals. In order to enforce this ideology a large segment of the population will be made to pay disproportionately more than other individuals in the city.
Again, rent subsidies should be made by government based on need.
Here are two quotes that describe the direction that rent control is following:
Nazi Land Philosophy:
'The issue of land ownership is secondary; what counts is the issue of control. Private citizens, therefore, may continue to hold titles to property--so long as the state reserves to itself the unqualified right to regulate the use of their property.'
Leonard Peikoff, The Ominous Parallels, 1982
Ernst Huber, official Nazi Party spokesman, 1933:
'All property is common property. The owner is bound by the people and the Reich to the responsible management of his goods. His legal position is only justified when he satisfies this responsibility to the
This is the ultimate philosophy of UN Agenda 21.
Democrats are out in the streets protesting the approaching Trump presidency. It's no surprise that they're being joined by Socialists and Anarchists who never miss a good street riot.
I can understand Democrats who feel as if they were suddenly jettisoned from the driver's seat into a free fall of confusion. They've lost their sense of being in power and want to feel that intense camaraderie and joy of righteousness they had with Obama. They need to remain connected to their cohort. I get it. They're stunned. They meet at restaurants, in the check-out line at Whole Foods, at Starbucks, at street protests, and they look into one another's faces with a wide-eyed terror. They're like children at a scary movie. They've succeeded in terrorizing themselves. Their own children are terrified and panicked as they watch their parents fall apart predicting mass deportations, loss of abortion rights, and global inundation from rising seas. And, in spite of the heavy indoctrination and social attacks, you know that many Democrats did vote for Trump. Even if they won't admit it.
During the election period I switched back and forth from MSNBC to Fox and found it to be both fascinating and disgusting. The polarization of blue and red was an outrage. I was especially disgusted by MSNBC's commitment to twist the truth in order to incite the Democrats. Democrats I talked to were basically ignorant about what Trump had actually said or done, got their information from MSNBC, and never verified with the actual source i.e. a Trump speech, press conference, statement, or interview. These were intelligent people who preferred pseudo-news and entertainment to actual verifiable information.
Why? Why are Democrats so unable to hear the truth?
They are so accustomed to being agreed with that they literally cannot hear dissent. If they're young people they've been schooled to filter out and block dissent. During the Occupy sleep-ins around the country we interviewed Occupiers and found them to be angered by mere questions that did not follow the accepted line. Anything that challenged their prepared script was too threatening and too dangerous for them to listen to. It's the New Man. It's Common Core. It's Agenda 21.
So now what?
Hopefully Trump really will start scrubbing the EPA, HUD, Interior, Transportation and other agencies of regulations that are destroying our ability to live and be productive in the United States.
Hopefully cities and counties will be exposed as Smart Growth UN Agenda 21 collaborators and will be forced by their aware citizens to rewrite their General Plans.
It will be interesting to see if undocumented / illegal immigrants in Sanctuary Cities will have to prove that they really do need sanctuary, and what happens to those cities which break federal law.
What about the US court system? Is it possible to bring justice back to the courtroom?
The pendulum has swung too far and now there may be an opportunity to block UN Agenda 21's progress. Is it too much to hope that we can bring awareness of the devastating impacts of UN Agenda 21 to the new administration? I don't know, but I believe that there is a chance. We have to take it. And as I've said to other Democrats: Ask yourself why half of the voters in this nation would vote for a President who has never even been elected to a city council. Why are people so desperate that they will elect an inexperienced billionaire to the office of President? People have been driven to this by the aggressive implementation of UN Agenda 21 in every area of America. It has to stop.
NOW TAKE THE BALL AND RUN WITH IT.
AWARENESS IS THE FIRST STEP IN THE RESISTANCE.
ACTION IS THE SECOND STEP.
And the winner is...
Winners and losers. Guess which one we'll be? Need a hint? 1984. Two wars still going on after over 10 years...
NOTE: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. Articles may be republished as long as attribution bio is included and all links remain intact. 2010-2018 COPYRIGHT ROSA KOIRE