Category:

Obama's Attempt at Legal and Political Magic

9/11/2014

Blind adherence to a party or an ideology in the face of evidence that it is furthering a suicidal future is madness. So, yes, I am a liberal; Yes, I am a registered Democrat (since 1974); Yes, I realize that parties are a manipulation and distraction; and NO, I do not support President Obama's purported plan to violate the constitution.

New York Times August 27, 2014: "The Obama administration is working to forge a sweeping international climate change agreement to compel nations to cut their planet-warming fossil fuel emissions, but without ratification from Congress." click to read more--you should.

This article breathlessly describes how the President of the United States will broker a 'hybrid agreement' a new invention, called 'legal and political magic' by the Natural Resources Defense Council. The agreement would help avert the disaster of climate change and is the last chance to avert catastrophe according to the New York Times. In June Obama issued an Executive Order to command restrictions on energy and is being sued by some states.

Here's another quote from the article:

"American negotiators are instead homing in on a hybrid agreement — a proposal to blend legally binding conditions from an existing 1992 treaty with new voluntary pledges. The mix would create a deal that would update the treaty, and thus, negotiators say, not require a new vote of ratification."

In 1992 at the UN Earth Summit in Rio there were two treaties up for ratification: the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Framework Convention on Climate Change. The United States Senate did not approve the Convention on Biological Diversity after seeing that it would restrict human beings into islands of human habitation. Of course that is slowly happening anyway as a result of ICLEI members curcumventing the treaty process. The Framework Convention on Climate Change was signed by G.H.W. Bush and was approved by the Senate in October 1992, but it is considered 'not legally binding' because it does not set emission limits or have enforcement powers in place. There are no 'legally binding conditions from an existing 1992 treaty" that the US agreed to--it simply doesn't exist. Who will be 'compelled' to reduce emissions?
The US did not agree to the Kyoto Protocols, which were the follow-up to the 1992 Framework Convention on Climate Change. Will this 'legal and political magic' ensnare us in a treaty to which we did not agree?

Did the New York Times get it wrong? What's going on? How can the US 'update' an existing treaty? What is the legality of 'updating' a treaty which would effectively change the document to something that had not been agreed to previously? This is an extremely important question that goes far beyond the panic of Climate Change (we must avert disaster, no time to ask questions, you denier, you). Can any President of the United States change any document, amend any agreement, agree to something that requires the consent of Congress without going to Congress? The Congress is YOU.

When the US agrees to a treaty it overrides existing US law.

The US Constitution on the subject of treaties:

"Article II: [The President] shall have power, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to make treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur.

"Article VI: This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding."

Before you get on your high horse about saving the planet look at what is behind the green mask. This is not a left / right issue. This is GLOBALIZATION.

RESIST.

KEEP YOUR SPIRIT STRONG--YOU ARE NOT ALONE

8/24/2014

HERE ARE SOME RECENT COMMENTS FROM YOUR ALLIES ACROSS THE WORLD. YOU ARE NOT ALONE. THE RESISTANCE IS GROWING:

MEXICO
I want to let you know that here in Loreto, BCS Mexico, where we have a UNESCO marine park, we are about to be merged in a "Sister Park" program with Channel Islands National Park. The environmental organization that I resigned from in disgust almost four years ago is facilitating this and setting the stage for our endgame. Our way of life as a fishing village is at risk now. Yesterday a member of the NGO (eco alianza de Loreto) phoned me in a panic because he has been a big donor and now understands the manipulation. He called me to warn me what's in store for us in the fishing industry here so that I may warn my compañeros. Unfortunately there is very little information in Español available to the people and these treaties and agreements are being made in a language that is NOT spanish. Everything legally binding in Mexico MUST be in spanish, its the law. Here is the link for what I am talking about and after that I am adding the link in español. Notice how the español version is totally lacking information and that most of the pdf that is linked off the spanish page, is in English! http://ecoalianzaloreto.org/newsroom.html
spanish http://ecoalianzaloreto.org/espanol/noticias.html Right now I am busy working but this afternoon I will bring in one very well respected fisherman and I'll show him what I see from my computer display. He is my neighbor. Then tomorrow I will do the same with another fisherman who is equally well respected. I will give both the translated version of the "delphi method" document (I translated from your website, thank you!). and then we'll take it from there. Thank you for your information and for continuing to fight the fight!

CANADA
I am in Calgary Alberta. After I read your book I realized how deep the City of Calgary as well as the small cities and towns surrounding Calgary are involved and already implementing UN Agenda 21. What amazes me is the level of ignorance there is understanding the consequences of its implementation.

ALASKA
Hello from Alaska, I've read the book cover to cover. The information has inspired me to do more. My recent information gathering and ground work has stirred up growing interest in my good neighbors. They are wanting to do more "now" as group. I've been encouraging them to do as I, and research (gather survey and easement documentation) and be proactive themselves, as to educate themselves prior to engaging anyone out side of our small coffee group. Our rural community has been overwhelmed by ski, bike, and real-estate d groups developing state land and implementing their agenda of smart growth while trying to eradicate our rights to the same state lands. The neighborhood doesn't like it but the community has embraced it? The community council is in the final stages of adopting a "comprehensive plan" developed by the guidance of the Fishook community council board and the Mat-su borough personnel.

CALIFORNIA
This A21 mess is EVERYWHERE! Here in Dublin, they've ripped out the last flat parking areas at our Dublin BART Station and are preparing to slam in more stack and pack housing! There was a TV ad on our cable the other day (all expensive animation) that showed the future of Dublin with stack and pack low rise buildings lining Dublin Blvd as far as you can see. Who paid for that ad? I also met a School Teacher yesterday who teaches in the east bay. The first thing I ask any teacher is how do you like common core. This person rolled their eyes and then said how much they hated it. I then asked if they knew about Agenda 21. They said they'd never heard of it... I told them to get on the internet and get up to speed. I shared your book and info with a friend up in Oregon. They said they'd already "Dieted" their downtown roads for millions of dollars. When they started the project, studies had documented only an average of 10 bicyclists on the inner city roads, a day! At our kids school, one of our teachers told me I was the only parent aware of the origins of CCSS and the poison it was to the future generation of US citizens. (If we're still a country when they graduate) Thank you for all your efforts to stop the A21, and One Bay Area train wreck!

CALIFORNIA
Who can I contact in Los Angeles County about attending the Agenda 21 Delphi meetings and working against Agenda 21 in my county? I live in Los Angeles.

BRAZIL
Rosa, I'm watching you on Open Mind Conference in 2013 Denmark, and I must say, you have to come to Brazil, just for a cup of coffee. Everything you say about Agenda 21 explains so much of what I feel here - I live in "nowhere" by the way, outside São Paulo, an hour away - and it is invisible, as Agenda 21 must be. I asked the owner of a local store, here at nowhere, about some seeds he had for sale - where do they come from? Are they Monsanto seeds? Etc, and he said just "Gee, I don't know, we buy them from Agroceres I guess, don't know". No one knows anything and yet everything you say sounds incredibly "Brazilian", or "Neo-Brazilian". No one knows Agenda 21 exists, no one has a clue - and no one cares, but I smell it everywhere. So I wanted to ask you if you know about Agenda 21 in Brazil, at least where I could find real info about it. All I see is "how wonderfull sustainable development is". Imagine, a Brazilian asking an American about information on Brazil. Well, this is typically Brazilian. Brazil, I am quite sure, is the most Agenda 21 obedient country on Earth. I can't prove it but I'm sure of that. This must be the model country - maybe that's why this monstrosity was signed in Rio, no less. I'm a musician and I even did a record called "Agenda 21", a jazz record, but somehow it was put aside by the people at the studio, probably because you know, these conspircay things, not good. Self censorship, auto-indoctrination, obedience, alienation, illusion, fake, common good, you will find all that and much more here in abundance. In fact, every "conspiracy" video I watch and see how much Americans are becoming outraged by what is going on in the US (the police state etc), to me it sounds like "duh, this is how Brazil works since I was born". Which, incidentally, was 1964, not an insignificant year in Brazil's history. Ok, I just felt I had to say something and ask you about Brazil. If you have time, of course. Many many many congratulations on your work, it's truly hero stuff. Bravo. And thank you. In the 80s-90s I started smelling something very wrong happening, some "change", something "new". Working with music for advertising I suddenly had to do "new" stuff, modern, cool, something was changing, people's expressions, new looks, something was in the air, globalization etc, but of course I was only called paranoid and negative. You helped me understand finally what this "change" has been, or at least an important part of it, these global changes that were picked up by my intuition, so thank you very much.

MASSACHUSETTS
I'm in Massachusetts probably hopeless down here but any advice or information might be helpful, people look at me like I have two heads when I talk about it

WASHINGTON
First of all, thank you. I recently joined the city planning commission of my small hometown in the Pacific Northwest. Agenda 21 is alive and voraciously enticing and brainwashing my fellow Americans. I now understand thanks to your book the grand journey I will be undertaking by thwarting the plans of globalist funded, unelected, "regional councils". I hope to be in contact with you in the future and look forward to a bright future.

NEW YORK
First of all, let me say thank you for all that you have done, and continue to do to educate people about Agenda 21! I have bought and handed out numerous copies of your book, "Behind the Green Mask."

I live in Wyoming County of western New York State which, unfortuantely, is now home to 308 industrial wind turbines. We were able to stop them from putting up the 2,000+ wind turbines that they originally intended to blanket the entire County with, but it's been a decade long battle! As you well know - useless, sprawling wind factories are part and parcel of Agenda 21 - just a huge land grab geared at driving people out of the countrysides!

I just wanted to update you on what Governor Cuomo is now doing. NY Gov. Cuomo's $Billion Dollar ratepayer-funded 'sun initiative' is in addition to the $Billion Dollar "Green Bank" he already instituted. And all of this following the passage of his "Power NY Act 2011," which removed New York State municipalities long-hel "Home Rule" regarding the siting of energy facilities over 25 MW (obviously designed to aid & abet the siting of sprawling wind factories.) Unfortunately, most politicians are completely energy-illiterate and buy into the "green" BS.

Most disturbing is Governor Cuomo's recent press release (pasted below): GOVERNOR CUOMO ANNOUNCES FUNDAMENTAL SHIFT IN UTILITY REGULATION Governor Cuomo Announces Historic Commitment to Solar Power: http://www.governor.ny.gov/press/04242014-solar-power
Governor Cuomo Announces Historic Commitment to Solar Power | Governor Andrew M. Cuomo $1 Billion Commitment to NY-Sun to Support Widescale Private Investment in New York’s Solar Industry Albany, NY (April 24, 2014)

READ MORE ON OUR COMMENTS PAGE--CLICK

SPEAK OUT.
EXPOSE COLLABORATORS.
REFUSE TO COOPERATE.
RESIST.

WONDERING WHAT YOU CAN DO? TAKE A LOOK AT THIS VICTORY

8/12/2014

Shaw Granted Injunction Against Alameda County in Billboard Battle!

PRESS RELEASE
FOR IMMEDIATE DISTRIBUTION

Citizens for Free Speech Granted Injunction Against Alameda County as I-580 Billboards are Protected by Federal Court

Castro Valley, August 5, 2014 – On Tuesday August 5 Michael Shaw and Jeff Herson of Citizens for Free Speech (Citizens) obtained a court injunction against Alameda County's objection to the construction of three 2-sided billboards along I-580 in Castro Valley, California.

The court ruled against the County and declared, "The Zoning Ordinance Gives Officials Too Much Discretion in Approving or Disapproving Signs Based on Their Content."

Michael Shaw, co-founder of Citizens poses this question: “Is the Alameda County Board of Supervisors trying to hide ABAG, ICLEI, and One Bay Area from the citizens?”

###

We are proud to be partners with Michael Shaw and Freedom Advocates in the lawsuit to stop Plan Bay Area.
FreedomAdvocates.org StopPlanBayArea.org

REGIONALIZATION AS NEO-FEUDALISM: UN AGENDA 21

6/20/2014

MEDIA SMEAR: ROSA KOIRE'S INTERVIEW WITH FORTUNE MAGAZINE (Video)

6/19/2014

Fortune Magazine (Fortune 500/Time, Inc.) published an article yesterday highlighting me and our fight against UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development. The article is a nuanced manipulation that lies by omission and half-truths, and slimes by intent. David Morris, the author, brings in ICLEI public relations and the Southern Poverty Law Center to 'balance' the article, and then concludes that Agenda 21 is necessary to save the planet---it 'requires some sacrifices, not all of them made entirely willingly'. The following quote is from our interview; David Morris asked me if I had anything to add.

I guess what I want to ask you, David, is 'How committed you are to representing a particular point of view that's going to marginalize what I've told you?' I'm hoping that you're going to write an article that is genuine and fair...We have something serious going on in our country and around the world and it needs to be dealt with in a serious manner. If the major corporations which own the media are controlling that information we will not be able to get that information out to the people so that they can make these decisions for themselves. So I'm hoping--you have an opportunity here--and I'm really hoping that you're going to use it.

Watch the interview here on YouTube and read the article (click). Judge for yourself how the media operates to manipulate public opinion and block the truth.

Powerful Direct Challenge to Unelected Council of Government in California

6/11/2014

Michael Shaw of Freedom Advocates has issued a powerful challenge to the pushers of Plan Bay Area: billboards targeting commuters on heavily traveled Interstate 580 in northern California.

Shaw is our co-plaintiff in the lawsuit against Plan Bay Area, and he is taking steps to put free speech to the test here in California. State law says that billboards must be licensed to advertise through major billboard owners or, alternately, only advertise the business on which the sign is located. Shaw owns the property but has posted a free speech message, not an advertisement. His message is one of liberty, and his goal is to raise the consciousness of the thousands who see it daily.

Take a look. Spread the word.

RELIGIOUSITY AND THE HOLIEST PROFESSION: Planning

5/30/2014

The American Planning Association has a couple of slogans that you should know about:
"Collective Strength."
"Making Great Communities Happen."

The APA wants you to know that without them you'd just be a mess. Here's what they say in their Communications Bootcamp Webinar #1 (November 4, 2011):

"PLANNERS ARE THE GUARDIANS OF THE FUTURE."

The 'guardians of the future' is a mighty important position---one that most of us are unaware of, and to which we don't recall electing anyone from the APA.

"PLANNING IS ABOUT LEADING, INNOVATING AND INSPIRING THE NEXT GENERATION."

A profession that has such a high opinion of itself should be committed to following an ethical road but you'll see that the American Planning Association encourages planners to manipulate outcomes to---what?---protect the plan! They want your info, but only so they can use it to fight you.

"Reach out to groups likely to oppose
Request a meeting with them to listen to concerns and ideas

Do not try to change their minds--collect their input
Encourage them to provide you with materials (books, websites, etc.)
Research local activist websites"

The planners who work in your local planning department or are the consultants hired to craft your local plan (or the 'regional' plan) are members of the American Planning Association. You are paying them. Those who work for your local government are civil servants who expect long term employment with a pension at the end of their term. These planners are advising your local elected officials; your mayor, the planning commissioners, the council people, the county supervisors etc. Most of those elected officials will be in and out of office while the staff stay on for twenty years or more. The staff (the planners) was trained by and uses American Planning Association materials. Staff lives in your town usually. Here's what the APA advises them to do when we come out to tell the truth about their plans:

Build up your base.

Reach out to fans of planning and trusted messengers
Cultivate and prepare key champions and messengers
Educate them about the nature of these attacks
Enlist them to help and respond: Public forums and testimony. Online, social and traditional media
Provide support to elected officials and educate the media
Cultivate influentials who can 'push back' when needed
Coach your elected officials
Innoculate elected officials

And now for the conclusion!

"Planning needs to be reframed as something pivotal to the return of American prosperity and economic strength."

Yes, the APA wants you to know that if it were not for those planners overlaying transit oriented zoning all over your town we'd be doomed to crushing economic collapse forever...as we may well be if they keep overlaying transit oriented zoning all over our towns. And the APA wants us to believe that if we don't think REGIONALLY we're doomed. And the APA wants us to believe that if we don't go along with 'planned future' we'll die.

Now, instead of "planning" go back to the sections in blue and replace the word 'PLANNING' with ... the name of a religion that you might not agree with....and read it again. Do you believe? You need to have faith in Planning. You must trust that the planners are making great communities happen through their collective strength and superior vision. Planners are the leaders of the next generation---they told you so.

Are the planners the holy priests? The guardians of our future? The creators of the grand utopia that we are too stupid to accept without a struggle? The holy seers who redesign our lives and fight us when we foolishly object?

BOW DOWN

May 3: Globalization of California conference/ May 10 Free&Equal Los Angeles

5/2/2014

Join me and other speakers and activists at tomorrow's Globalization of California conference on Treasure Island, San Francisco 10:00-5:30
CLICK HERE FOR TICKETS AND INFORMATION

I'm excited to be a part of the Free & Equal
UNITED WE STAND Festival
Next Saturday, May 10 UCLA Pauley Pavilion
CLICK HERE FOR TICKETS AND INFORMATION

SEE YOU THERE!

GLOBALIZATION OF CALIFORNIA CONFERENCE--May 3 in San Francisco

4/9/2014

In meetings across California, unelected and unaccountable regulators are setting up networks of regional government that are usurping local control from you and your duly elected city, county, community and other local officials. These regional bodies are not acting in the “public good” but are reinventing a government that strips property rights away from legitimate property owners and instead gives them to a chosen few under the auspices of programs such as “sustainable development”, ”smart growth” and “public-private partnerships.”

Are you a property owner? Do you value local control of your communities by your duly elected officials? If so, then the time to act is NOW!

The Globalization of California Forum brings top recognized experts together (Michael Shaw, Patrick Wood, Rosa Koire, Debbie Bacigalupi, Heather Gass, Mike Munzing, Matt Grocott, Steve Brandau) to reveal the details and the necessary actions to put a stop to it! Space is limited, so get your ticket today!

The Globalization of California Forum
Saturday, May 3, 2014 – 10:00AM to 5:30PM
Treasure Island, San Francisco Bay
Doors open at 9:30AM for Check-in & Registration
Lunch and Information Packet included
Individual, Family and Group Tickets Available

eventbrite ticket

$2 Billion Bet on Your Virtual Future: Facebook and Virtual Reality is Agenda 21

3/27/2014

Facebook's CEO Mark Zuckerberg is betting $2 billion that you'll prefer virtual reality to the real thing. He has just invested in Oculus, a company that makes headsets for virtual reality personal imaging. The 'story' is that this is all about gaming but it's not a big leap to virtual classrooms, virtual travel, virtual relationships, and virtual meals. What does this mean for your future?

It's not a new idea to say that internet use is habit-forming. You've also experienced or witnessed the gaming 'addiction' either personally or in your family members. Now get ready for obsession on steroids with virtual reality. When you put on this headset your body will respond to the 3D images as if they are truly reality. If you're wearing it and you look down you'll see your feet -- but they'll be the feet of the supermodel you see when you look in the virtual mirror. When you look up you'll see the cosmos through the space capsule window, or the Sistine Chapel ceiling as you walk alone through the building. Lift the virtual fork to your virtual mouth and eat the gorgeous meal in Paris. Look into the eyes of your virtual partner as you profess eternal love. Walk across a tightrope over a deep canyon. Kill an enemy.

Your palms will sweat, your heart will beat faster, your eyes will dilate, your lungs will suck in air more deeply, and your nervous system will respond. Although your physical responses with the current virtual reality headset are not exactly like they would be if the experience were real, the future will most certainly include smells and sensations---like the 'Feelies' described in Huxley's Brave New World. The addition of these sense stimulators will fool the brain.

Yes, it's a movie, a 3D virtual surround movie, but your body will respond as if it were real. Your brain will believe that it is real. It will, in fact, be far more appealing than your actual un-virtual life. The stimulation your brain receives will be thrilling, and you'll be content to sit strapped in your chair living your virtual life. Is this a fantasy? No. Look at this 1978 study in Science Magazine stating that Rhesus monkeys, when caged and given the choice of food or cocaine, chose cocaine 'almost exclusively.' The addiction to virtual experience may likely lead to people sitting at their computers starving to death in their Smart Growth unit. Who needs living space or transportation when they're strapped to a virtual reality unit? Who needs relationships or families or pets when virtual reality is so much more satisfying and uncomplicated? Children will be extremely vulnerable to this fabulous new life---virtual teachers in virtual classrooms will teach limited learning for lifelong labor. Rewards for correct behavior may be virtual, but the brain and body will accept them as real. Real personal interaction will be miserably inadequate when compared to the ecstatic joys of virtual life.

According to Stanford Professor Jeremy Bailenson, whose book Infinite Reality examines all aspects of virtual reality research, the time is coming when holograms will be in use by average people--you'll be able to take a virtual walk with a friend in real time and that friend will appear to be with you. You won't be able to trust your eyes when you see what appears to be reality. There will be no objective reality.

Just like you asked for Facebook, and begged for smart phones, and jumped on Second Life, you'll love the novelty of virtual reality---until it is no longer a novelty. It will be a health care requirement to provide virtual reality to the handicapped, it will be used to perform mental health assessments, it will be a virtual teacher and a virtual classroom to billions, it will be used to keep prisoners quiet, it will be used to dumb down and pacify the populace. It is the face of UN Agenda 21.

Can you resist or will you accept it as an inevitability?

RESIST SOCIAL MANIPULATION.
THIS IS UN AGENDA 21.

OUR FIGHT AGAINST PLAN BAY AREA: Step Up Now

3/18/2014

OUR LAWSUIT (Post Sustainability Institute, Rosa Koire, and Michael Shaw v Metropolitan Transportation Commission and Association of Bay Area Governments)
AGAINST MTC/ABAG WAS FILED OCTOBER 2013. YOUR FUNDING ASSISTANCE IS NEEDED TO KEEP THIS MAJOR CHALLENGE TO REGIONAL GOVERNANCE ALIVE. CLICK HERE TO DONATE NOW.

The Post Sustainability Institute strongly objects to the tremendous overreach of Plan Bay Area in the imposition of regional governance over the voters and their elected representatives in the nine county, 101 city San Francisco Bay Area. The elevation of an unelected, unrepresentative body over the people of these municipalities is a violation of the rights and freedoms guaranteed by the US and California constitutions. We assert that the Metropolitan Transportation Commission and the Association of Bay Area Governments have taken SB 375 and used it to impose an aggressive ideology of land use restrictions and regionalization. Regional governance inserts a layer of unelected boards between local government and the federal and state grant makers/funders. This regional layer (MTC/ABAG), unaccountable to the electorate, sets up de facto mandates for local government--effectively using money as a lure and a bludgeon to cities and counties desperate for funds. As more and more regions are created and imposed on local and state governments across the nation there will be less local control. Local government will exist solely to implement regional regulations administratively without meaningful input from the voters.

The necessity for government subsidies or changes to Proposition 13 (California property tax) to implement this Plan is clearly stated in the Plan itself on nearly every page. Restricting development of both residential and commercial uses primarily to highly urbanized city centers even when the real estate and economic markets do not support it is a recipe for failure and debt. The entire plan is a house of cards based on a financing scheme that does not exist in California: Redevelopment. Redevelopment debt has had a crippling impact on California; bonded debt for redevelopment in our state had reached $81 billion by 2007 and was doubling every 10 years. (Redevelopment: The Unknown Government, Municipal Officials for Redevelopment Reform, 2007). The reinstatement or reinvention of tax increment financing for private development imposes a generational debt requiring 20-40 years of payments to bond brokers. Schemes for assembling and acquiring privately owned fully-developed land parcels in the Priority Development Areas will, as stated in the Plan, require eminent domain. Eminent domain is intended for public use only, and the perversion of the concept of public use to acquire land for private benefit will not be tolerated in California. In any case, at the time that Plan Bay Area is scheduled for adoption (July 18, 2013) none of these potential funding schemes is in effect, therefore the Plan fails the feasibility requirement of SB 375.

Plan Bay Area and SB 375 are predicated on the implementation of Sustainable Development. Sustainable Development was formally defined in the 1987 United Nations publication Our Common Future written by the UN World Commission on Environment and Development (referred to as the Brundtland Commission). Sustainable Development is defined as:

Development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their needs.

All that remained was to state that our current activities and means of living were ‘compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs’ and then decide what to do about it.

After Our Common Future was presented to the UN General Assembly in 1987 the World Commission on Environment and Development (Brundtland Commission) was tasked with designing strategies for achieving Sustainable Development by the year 2000. At the Rio Earth Summit in June, 1992, the Brundtland Commission came back with the action plan for implementing Sustainable Development globally: Agenda 21. Referred to as the Agenda for the 21st Century, this document was agreed to by 179 nations, including President George H.W. Bush.

William Clinton was elected President in November, 1992, and six months later he issued Executive Order #12852 which created the President’s Council on Sustainable Development (PCSD). It first met in the summer of 1993; and continued until 1999. The members of the PCSD included Cabinet Secretaries for Transportation, Agriculture, Education, Commerce, Housing and Urban Development, Environmental Protection Agency, Small Business Administration, Energy, Interior, and Defense. Representing business were CEOs for Pacific Gas and Electric, Enron (Ken Lay), BP Amoco, and Dow Chemical, among others. Environmental organizations rounded out the balance with the Natural Resources Defense Council, Sierra Club, World Resources Institute, the Nature Conservancy, and the Environmental Defense Fund being the most notable.

The PCSD immediately began laying the groundwork for implementing Agenda 21 in the United States. The goal was to change public policy to bring it into alignment with the new agenda for the 21st century. The PCSD formalized its recommendations in ‘Sustainable America—A New Consensus.’

In the PCSD’s list of vital elements to incorporate into their recommendations they included this statement:

‘We need a new collaborative decision process that leads to better decisions, more rapid change, and more sensible use of human, natural, and financial resources in achieving our goals.’

A new collaborative decision process. The new definition for consensus is the neutralization of expressed opposition.

In the old way of doing things, the democratic way, an issue is put before the voters and they vote on it directly, or they have a representative who reviews the issues, debates them publicly, and then votes. If the voters are not satisfied with the outcome, they can initiate a referendum or vote out the representative.

‘Sustainable America—A New Consensus’ does not allow for actual dissent. There can be no opportunity for failure in implementing Agenda 21. In fact the Cabinet Secretaries reported that they could implement approximately two thirds of the PCSD’s recommendations administratively. However, it is not desirable that citizens notice that they are not being given a choice in the most important issues of their lives, so they are given the illusion that they are making decisions for themselves. The real meaning of consensus is to take away your voice and leave you feeling as if you are the only one who has some problem with the results. The President’s Council on Sustainable Development incorporated the Delphi Technique into its recommendations so that ‘more rapid change’ could be imposed on us through clever manipulation. The Delphi Technique was used by MTC/ABAG and their consultants in their ‘visioning meetings’ in order to manipulate the outcome. Although they will say that they have never heard of the Delphi Technique they are in fact using it to direct public opinion, ignore or marginalize dissent, and declare ‘consensus’ on their preferred alternative.

Sustainable Development/UN Agenda 21 is exemplified in the Plan Bay Area documents by the push for high density urban development in city centers by any means necessary while starving the rural and suburban areas for funds and development. Using tactics better suited to criminal gangs, MTC/ABAG is hoping to slam through the most aggressive regional plan in the United States. UN Agenda 21 is a global plan implemented locally, and this is the Plan for the SF Bay Area. Similar plans can be found throughout the United States and the world with names like Envision Utah, Imagine Calgary, Granite State Future, PlaNY, One Valley One Vision, Horizon 2025 (Ontario, Canada), and Hanoi (Viet Nam) Regional Center 2030 Plan. All of these plans are the same plan with the same goal: move people out of the rural and suburban areas into the city centers where they can be more easily managed, controlled, and surveilled. This is not a conspiracy theory, it is a conspiracy fact. No amount of government-sponsored shaming, mocking, marginalizing, or lying about those of us speaking the truth can change this fact. The people of the United States of America and of the State of California will not be a party to this plan to destroy private property and civil rights. We intend to fight Plan Bay Area and we intend to win.

DEATH OF A SALESMAN: HOW UN AGENDA 21 KILLS SMALL BUSINESS

3/7/2014

Small business. The chance to conceive an idea and bring it to fruition has appealed to those who hoped to work for themselves and develop a dream into an independent reality. All across the world men and women buy and resell, make, bake, craft, and create goods and services that they hope to grow into something that will enable them to support themselves and their families. UN Agenda 21 pretends to support that process but, like all of its rhetoric, this too is a lie.

The concept of 'capacity building' pervades UN Agenda 21's 300 pages but out in the world the NGO-driven pretense of developing local economies is masking the real goal: destroy independence and eliminate competition for global corporations.

Here is just one example of methods used to destroy independence and small business:

Micro-finance
My last post, The Gap Year, mentions that upper and middle class US students working with non-governmental organizations are sent to lesser developed countries (LDC's) in order to 'teach' the poor about micro-finance. In passing you'll note that these high school students have no experience with or specialized information about micro-finance and are themselves financed by parents paying between $10,000 and $45,000 for their third world vacation. In the post-UN Agenda 21 world, sending high school students to 'teach' the poor how to be successful is really about teaching the high school students how to be poor and find it virtuous in the face of their tremendous first-world shame.

What is micro-finance and what is it doing to the poor of the world? Touted as a way to 'empower the poor, women, youth, minorities, indigenous, under-represented etc', micro-finance is extremely popular with non-profit groups acting as the lowest level of bureaucracy of first world governments. These NGOs act to covertly implement foreign policy and the policy of UN Agenda 21. Micro-finance provides small loans directly to small, often one person businesses in order to assist them in getting started. A charming proposal, but what is the reality?

A February 23, 2014 article in the New York Times and this article in the Business Insider detail just a few of the stories that have filled the news over the last five years. All tell of the miserable struggles that rural Indians are facing through small loan defaults. Debt and spiraling interest payments drive these inexperienced borrowers to suicide. In a horrific nod to the feudal era, the families of the borrowers in India, Cambodia, Kenya, Uganda and other countries are responsible for their family-members' debts. Known in pre-twentieth century England as 'entailments,' generational debts are still a devastating crippler of the future across the world. Early American law did away with the entail and ended the practice of chaining future generations to the debt of their ancestors. Present-day micro-finance, pushed by UN Agenda 21 change agents viewing themselves as the saviors of the poor, are destroying fledgling businesses and families across the developing world for generations. Children are born with personal debt---debt that must be paid. For some people suicide seems like the only answer to the tremendous stress in rural areas. According to the NYT article, "the suicide rate for farmers is nearly three times the national average...with global competition and rising costs cutting into their lean profits, their ranks are dwindling."

Yes, small businesses, farmers in rural India, are trying to compete on the global stage and are falling victim to the true goals of UN Agenda 21.

EXPOSE UN AGENDA 21. SPEAK OUT. RESIST.

WHAT DOES IT TAKE TO MOTIVATE THE RESISTANCE?

2/3/2014

As I travel around the world speaking about UN Agenda 21 and the powerful totalitarian corporatocracy through regionalization and the standardization of all systems, I rage. What does it take to motivate the Resistance further? It's a hassle to take action, I know that. You risk loss of friends, embarrassment, ostracism from colleagues----the list goes on.

But what do you gain? You meet new people who can work with you to open eyes and hearts to the fight against the viciously relentless movement away from a representative government to that of the unelected systems analysts who see themselves as the new force of human development.

We are having a tremendous impact worldwide: you are part of the worldwide non-partisan grassroots movement to resurrect the individual's rights. As non-profit pseudo-environmentalist groups partner with major corporations and foundations to inventory, standardize, and control every aspect of your life the mask has slipped away revealing the ugly truth. We are being manipulated with the pretty images of 'one world, one love' and finding that the message translates to 'be passive, don't resist, be peaceful, accept what is'. This kind of message, this collective thinking, presumes that some beautiful peaceful god-like new man is being created now. This is a lie. Social engineering in schools (now called Common Core, but previously Whole Child, or Outcomes Based Education) forms the basic personality of the future men and women of your world. The idea now is that nations are outdated and unnecessary, and that technology has made the concept of separateness obsolete. When all people are homogenized there is no need for a separate nation, or a separate homelife, or a separate individualized worldview. All are one. The obvious problem with this simple concept is that it assumes that man is good; a lovely assumption not based in reality. Yes, there are lovely good people, but they have not run the world in the past and are not likely to be directing events in the future. If this cohort had fully controlled the entire world in 1941 there would have been no safe haven and no resistance. The world is being run as a corporation and we, the individual inhabitants of it, are being used to further that model.

We're in a pivotal moment now; that of the awakening prior to the great sleep---if we don't act.

What can you do? Take an active part. Learn. Speak out. Refuse to cooperate. Expose collaborators. Do more than you have been doing. If you're interested in sports, or the arts, or gardening, or exercise or whatever you do in your 'free moments' please take some of this time and use it for the RESISTANCE. Make posters to put up on phone poles in your area. Expose that regional plan. Expose behavioral modification in your local school with flyers. Sponsor a talk by someone knowledgeable about the local issues in your town. Be that knowledgeable person yourself. If your town has been rezoned for Smart Growth, or for Form Based Zoning, expose that. If your university is sponsoring UN Agenda 21 sustainable development courses that subvert our system of representative government, expose that. Run for local office. Picket your local schools. Attend school board meetings. Read the school books--even if you don't have a kid in school. Resist charter schools---which are not answerable to the locally elected school board. Get out and march against the NSA and domestic surveillance. Refuse to use a 'smart phone.' Demand to be heard in the fight against the National Defense Authorization Act. Don't be duped by mainstream lies about the Resistance. Get your town out of ICLEI. Make public records requests to see how your town has been manipulated by ICLEI's Climate Action Plans. Fight them. Refuse that SMART METER. Have the courage to look like a fool to your neighbors when you walk flyers around town. Put that flyer on a doorstep on Saturday morning and feel like a hero. Just do it.

THINK FOR YOURSELF. ASK YOURSELF THE HARD QUESTIONS. DO YOU HAVE THE GUTS TO RESIST?

REFUSE TO GIVE UP YOUR RIGHTS. SPEAK UP. STAND UP.
RESIST.

Here's a note from someone who is taking action in his town. BE INSPIRED:
Thank you for what you are doing. I am going to put your flyers out in my neighborhood. I am so tired of this crap. I don't understand why some human beings feel the need to dominate and destroy other human beings. Whatever happened to the Golden Rule? I really like the flyer idea, I can get some exercise and reach some people.

God Bless You Rosa!

Anthony

PS..... I was watching one of your presentations and It really hit me when you asked for a show of hands of people that would have joined the Nazi's when they came to power in Germany. Clearly nobody in their right mind would envision themselves doing such a thing. Yet, it is mind boggling to me the level of apathy I find when trying to talk to people about these issues. I can see now how the Nazi's were able to pull the wool over peoples eyes. This A-21 and NWO are hideous. You are right, we all have to make the decision not to comply with this at every possible level, and get busy taking action against it. If we don't it is exactly like joining the Nazi's. I would rather die defending my freedoms than live in a country where there are none!

No Good Germans!

THE FOURTH PILLAR OF UN AGENDA 21: CULTURE

12/1/2013

Often you'll hear UN Agenda 21's primary elements referred to as a "three-legged stool": Economy, Ecology, and Social Equity. You'll see this image:

Where the elements come together in the middle is the 'sustainable' balance that is the supposed goal of the restructuring of every aspect of your life.

In 2004 a 'world congress of cities' was formed to comment on the part that 'culture' plays in re-crafting identity. Out of that congress the fourth pillar emerged: Culture.

"The Agenda 21 for culture is the first document with worldwide mission that advocates establishing the groundwork of an undertaking by cities and local governments for cultural development. The Agenda 21 for culture was agreed by cities and local governments from all over the world to enshrine their commitment to human rights, cultural diversity, sustainability, participatory democracy and creating conditions for peace.

It was approved by the 4th Forum of Local Authorities for Social Inclusion of Porto Alegre, held in Barcelona on 8 May 2004 as part of the first Universal Forum of Cultures.

United Cities and Local Governments (UCLG) adopted the Agenda 21 for culture...UCLG’s Working Group on Culture, constituted in Beijing on 9 June 2005, is the meeting point for cities, local governments and networks that place culture at the heart of their development processes."

This group, United Cities and Local Governments, says it represents half the population of the world but you've never heard of it.

So what could this mean? The fourth pillar of UN Agenda 21 is CULTURE. Think about some of what we're seeing around the world:

Across the United States, the indigenous people, Indians, are opening casinos. Indians are considered a sovereign nation within US borders but receive federal funds and assistance. Tribal heads who were not elected by tribe members are running the tribes like dictatorships and dis-enrolling members of their tribes who dare to challenge the ruling establishment of tribal councils. By the stroke of a pen an Indian becomes a non-Indian.

Cultural events often take place in rural areas, but less and less people are able to survive in their traditional rural towns. Regulations, restrictions, and outright prohibitions on timbering, fishing, ranching, and other rural pursuits has left an indelible mark on 'cultural' America. If you're not indigenous you lose your right to work your land.

The emphasis on tourism has relegated culture in many places around the world to folk dances and ethnic meals provided for the consumption of outsiders. Economies in some areas are dependent on the entertainment of these consumers of culture, and town centers are turned into pseudo-museums for their pleasure. Often authentic members of these areas are unable to afford their own 'culture' or find it to be commercialized into a caricature of the past. The preservation of these living museums may mean that anything that isn't scenic has to go away, even it means economic collapse.

Culture may be defined as modern dance and art learned and produced in a university setting with all of the requirements that academia demands. Analyzing the creation becomes the culture itself.

New rights are being granted: positive rights. Positive rights can be taken away or granted, unlike the rights we have guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Our constitutional rights are those we are born with, they can't be taken away or granted by a government -- just protected by it. UN Agenda 21 'rights' are really privileges designed as rewards and punishments.

Discrimination will extend to anything which acknowledges difference, but only when it is being done by others. You'll be a 'hater' if you note unfair advantage, manipulation, or discrimination against the traditional mainstream. Culture is something to be used as a tool in the manipulation of demographics. The emphasis on diversity, on empowering women and youth, and the poor, and others formerly less attended to by society means that culture is defined by the 'other' rather than by those who live it. It is externalized, commercialized, romanticized, and politicized for the benefit of the elitist consumer while the exploitation of the social group is carpeted over in green.

When you contemplate what culture is, you'll find yourself reflecting on agricultural, rural values; you'll think about nature and the seasons and crops; you'll think about longtime communities of friends and family; you'll think about religion and ritual; you'll contemplate courtship and marriage, and childbirth, and death. Culture is the human being's journey through life and beyond.

United Nations' Agenda 21 is a sham imitation of this. It is the green mask of concern for the continuation of life covering a goal of pushing humans into urban islands of human habitation. This densely urban life of stress and economic deprivation is 'the new poverty' or the new austerity that redefines the individual's relationship to his/her government. UN Agenda 21 empowers the regional unit, whether it's in the Americas (example: Cascadia) or Europe (Danube Region: Centrope) over the nation and its manageable, responsive units. We are becoming hapless targets of the Mega-Corporations in their rush to exploit a moveable workforce taught whatever corporations need us to know in order to produce their widgets. Huge corporations sell you what they tell you you want, and you buy it. Smart Phone? Tracking device with built-in GPS. Video Games? Sociopathic training designed to develop action without introspection. ATT or Comcast Home Security? In home video surveillance.
This is your culture now.

Merry Christmas.
CULTURE IS THE FOURTH PILLAR OF UN AGENDA 21.
Refuse to cooperate.
Expose collaborators.
RESIST.

What Does UN Agenda 21 look like in my town?

10/30/2013

One way to recognize UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development is as a land use plan. Often these plans will be regional--crossing jurisdictional boundaries to group towns, cities, counties, parishes, and sometimes sections of different states together under a federally mandated Metropolitan Planning Commission and a Council of Government. These are often called Regional Planning Councils.

Here's a list of just a few of these plans:

One Bay Area/Plan Bay Area (9 counties 101 cities in the SF Bay Area) We're suing to stop this
The Power of 32 (32 Counties in 4 states (OH, PA, WV, MD)
One Valley One Vision (this title is used in Southern California, in Montana, and in Dona Ana County/Las Cruces, New Mexico)
Imagine KC (Kansas City, MO)
Envision Skagit 2060 (Washington)
Imagine 2040 (this is a popular title used by Hillsborough County, Florida; Memphis, TN area; and the Durham/Chapel Hill, NC area; and others)
Vision 2025 (another popular one, this is used by San Mateo County,CA; and Tulsa, OK)
Nine Counties One Vision (Tennessee)
PlanET (East Tennessee)
PlaNY (New York City)
Five Counties One Vision (Minnesota)
Four States One Vision (OK, Arkansas, Missouri, Kansas)
One Region One Vision (used by New York and by Indiana)
Seven50 (7 counties in SE Florida--one county has pulled out so they should change the name to Six50 ;>
Granite State Future (New Hampshire)

These are just a few of the plans you'll find around the US. They're all the same plan, of course. The street names change but the plans are all the same. All plans include Smart Growth--high density housing with restrictions on personal space and car usage. All plans span from 20 to 50 years. All plans support high speed rail. All plans link housing and transportation. All plans use 'visioning' workshops to invite the public to give their opinion on the plan even though it won't change it one bit.

Planners are panicking now because we are showing up at our county supervisor meetings and speaking out against these plans all over the nation. The planners have been quoted saying things like: 'I've never seen anything like this. The people are objecting to these plans for the first time.' They're used to doing this planning without your oversight, and they prefer it if you can be jollied along to agree with their vision of tightly packed housing with economy-destroying rail projects. Yes, when they invited the public to come to the visioning meetings they didn't mean YOU. You're not really a 'stakeholder' unless you agree with the plan.

You're told that unless you agree to regionalize your county/city/state you won't be able to compete on a global scale. It's more EFFICIENT. Yes, it is. So is a dictatorship.

<<Previous