Category:

ONCE UPON A TIME...THE 9/11 TALE WAGS ON

9/11/2014

One thing I'm grateful for on this 11th day of September 2014, thirteen years after, is that more and more people question what they read in the press and what they hear from 'officials.' More and more people are discerning, doubting, sharing information, and refusing to be manipulated. This is important progress.

We are becoming more courageous, more willing to do our research, and more likely to speak out about what we've uncovered. The threats and shame of being referred to as a 'denier' or a 'truther' or a tin-foil hat or a black helicopter person or any number of devices used to deter us from refusing to accept whatever storyline is trotted out for us, have failed to stop us.

I encourage you to stand fast when you know the truth and add to your body of knowledge. The more you know the stronger you are. Whether you're researching EPA restrictions or 9/11 or Sustainable Development or ICLEI or NDAA, Common Core, regionalization---the fulfillment of the new world order---whatever your focus you are adding to the strength of millions when you share your information and insights. Every one of us has a duty and responsibility to ourselves and to our liberty to follow the truth fearlessly. This can be depressing or frightening, but it can also be tremendously exhilarating and freeing. Read, research, listen, and use your individual mind to establish for yourself how you wish to live.

REFUSE TO COLLABORATE
THE WAR ON TERROR IS A WAR ON YOU.

MEASURING HUMAN CAPITAL: FIVE QUESTIONS TO CHALLENGE CONTROL

8/15/2014

When you're reading these 5 questions and imagining what the 'answers' would be (if anyone answers you) be sure to stretch this to fit situations where you're in the Planning Department of your city, or in a Visioning meeting about changes to the center of your town, or at a Climate Action Plan meeting. Standardization is being blanketed across all elements of our interaction with local government. The following post does not just apply to education and control of students. Continuous assessment of behavior and use applies to energy, law enforcement, business management, land use, government projects, and health care.

Here's a recent post from Charlotte Iserbyt's blog page
http://abcsofdumbdown.blogspot.mx/2014/08/five-magic-questions.html

Five Magic Questions
Enable Parents to Debate the Issues

In 1996 Anita Hoge devised and distributed widely the following useful tool for parents’ groups to use in testimony before state legislatures and local school boards. The questions reveal the disturbing psychological aspect of assessment testing and curriculum being given to children. It is alarming when one considers that the State has defined the criteria upon which these affective standards will be scored, and assigned a passing or fail grade, and will prescribe remediation in order to get the child to measure up to State-defined par.

These questions are still current and pertinent to Common Core, etc. They serve as an excellent educational tool to equip parents with the right questions they can ask the next time disturbing things begin to happen to their children and their schools. The text of the pamphlet is reproduced below in its entirety:

FIVE MAGIC QUESTIONS
ENABLE PARENTS TO DEBATE THE ISSUES

Education regulations or laws state which standards or outcomes your child needs to meet to graduate. Many of the outcomes are vague and subjective. Look at the verbs. This shows why these outcomes are impossible to measure objectively. An example under a category like “Citizenship” states, “All students will negotiate and cooperate with others.” The Five Magic Questions parents can use to win the debate when outcomes reflect subjective or vague areas are:

1. How do you measure that outcome? If an outcome states that “all children must have ethical judgment, honesty, or integrity,” what exactly is going to be measured? How do you measure a bias in a child in order for him to graduate? Must children be diagnosed? Will they be graded by observation or pencil or paper tests? How will performance or behavior be addressed?

2. How is that outcome scored or what is the standard? What behavior is “Appropriate” and to what degree? For example, how much self-esteem is too much or not enough to graduate? Can government score the attitudes and values of its citizens?

3. Who decides what that standard will be? The state has extended their mandated graduation requirements or exit outcomes down to the individual child. This bypasses all local autonomy. What about locally elected school directors? Will they become obsolete? Are we talking about a state or government diploma?

4. How will my child be remediated? What are you going to do to my children to change them from here to there in their attitudes and values in order to graduate? How do you remediate ethical judgment, decision-making, interpersonal skills, environmental attitudes? What techniques will be used? What risks are involved? What justification does the state have to change my children’s attitudes?

5. What if parent and state disagree on the standard or how it is measured in the classroom? Who has the ultimate authority over the child? What about privacy? Can parents opt out of a graduation requirement of the state?

All children must meet the same fixed standard of “future citizen” or not graduate, go to college, or get a job. Your child is human capital. This is why the state wants control of the graduation requirement—and that is why local school boards must create policy to stop the state from exerting power over elected officials. Ask this question: Do you want equity in opportunity, or do you want equity in standards?

Watch Anita B. Hoge discuss "The End Game of Assessment" on YouTube:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jc_G5GmigkY. This post is reproduced with some minor alteration from pp. 367-368 of the deliberate dumbing down of america.

MEDIA SMEAR: ROSA KOIRE'S INTERVIEW WITH FORTUNE MAGAZINE (Video)

6/19/2014

Fortune Magazine (Fortune 500/Time, Inc.) published an article yesterday highlighting me and our fight against UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development. The article is a nuanced manipulation that lies by omission and half-truths, and slimes by intent. David Morris, the author, brings in ICLEI public relations and the Southern Poverty Law Center to 'balance' the article, and then concludes that Agenda 21 is necessary to save the planet---it 'requires some sacrifices, not all of them made entirely willingly'. The following quote is from our interview; David Morris asked me if I had anything to add.

I guess what I want to ask you, David, is 'How committed you are to representing a particular point of view that's going to marginalize what I've told you?' I'm hoping that you're going to write an article that is genuine and fair...We have something serious going on in our country and around the world and it needs to be dealt with in a serious manner. If the major corporations which own the media are controlling that information we will not be able to get that information out to the people so that they can make these decisions for themselves. So I'm hoping--you have an opportunity here--and I'm really hoping that you're going to use it.

Watch the interview here on YouTube and read the article (click). Judge for yourself how the media operates to manipulate public opinion and block the truth.

Debt for Nature Swaps, Bundy, China, UN Agenda 21, and you

5/8/2014

Stickers on a lightpole in Germany 2013

Debt for Nature. Club of Paris agreement (1990 Houston terms) to have debtor nations manage their debt by converting it to 'conservation projects' for their creditors' benefit. Now we see that the China Connection in Nevada has the distinct odor of Debt for Nature.

To get a bit more perspective on the concept let's take a look at an interview with 'anti-anthropologist' Professor Maurice Bloch, as quoted in Eurozine (click to read)

Maurice Bloch: "To that I would add one thing that I think is very important. That is that in Madagascar, the development experts are being replaced by conservationists who wield tremendous power. They are largely motivated by some general kind of ideologies about ecology in the world, about preserving forests or some species, which is obviously a good idea. But what they really want is to have large reserves in places like Madagascar. They want to turn the whole country into a national park. Countries like Madagascar are hugely indebted. And European and North-American countries perform a kind of blackmail, which they call "swapping debt for nature". If you'll have natural parks then we'll drop the debt. And of course, the Malagassy government can't resist. The Malagassy elite are quite happy to have as many natural parks as the wealthy countries like, because the parks bring experts and the experts bring their money. But for the local people, it means that their land is just being taken away. They are not allowed to cultivate their land anymore. And they say, quite rightly, "the land has gone to the Americans". Villagers see their field on the other side of the fence; if they go to their field they will be fined or imprisoned, while they see American or European natural scientists wandering around on it. It's a terrible situation.

"Those anthropologists who work there have denounced very strongly what is going on in ecology. But they find that because of the power and self-righteousness of the ecological discourse, it is difficult to get heard. "

Sound familiar?

Now think about China's connection to the US in terms of debt.

This is US law:
Global Environmental Protection Assistance Act of 1989
Title 22, Chapter 32, Subchapter I, Part VII, Section 2281

Sec. 2281. - ''Debt-for-nature exchange'' defined

For purpose of this part, the term ''debt-for-nature exchange'' means the cancellation or redemption of the foreign debt of the government of a country in exchange for -

(1) that government's making available local currencies (including through the issuance of bonds) which are used only for eligible projects involving the conservation or protection of the environment in that country (as described in section 2283 of this title); or

(2) that government's financial resource or policy commitment to take certain specified actions to ensure the restoration, protection, or sustainable use of natural resources within that country; or

(3) a combination of assets and actions under both paragraphs (1) and (2)

UN AGENDA 21: CLOSE OFF NATURE. MOVE HUMANS INTO MEGA CITIES. INVENTORY, MONITOR, ASSESS, CONTROL.

RESIST.

May 3: Globalization of California conference/ May 10 Free&Equal Los Angeles

5/2/2014

Join me and other speakers and activists at tomorrow's Globalization of California conference on Treasure Island, San Francisco 10:00-5:30
CLICK HERE FOR TICKETS AND INFORMATION

I'm excited to be a part of the Free & Equal
UNITED WE STAND Festival
Next Saturday, May 10 UCLA Pauley Pavilion
CLICK HERE FOR TICKETS AND INFORMATION

SEE YOU THERE!

GATHERING THE SHREDS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC

4/23/2014

Our groups, Democrats Against UN Agenda 21, and Post Sustainability Institute, and I have been label as 'extremists' by the Southern Poverty Law Center for the second year in a row. They have written a report entitled Agenda 21: The UN, Sustainability, and Right-wing Conspiracy Theory. Aside from the fact that the SPLC is using the tactics they accuse others of using in order to supplement their huge financials assets (over $250 million) and elicit reactions from those on the left who don't do their own homework, it is important to note that they offer 'briefings' to law enforcement personnel and are members of the American Bar Association. The ethics of labeling a group of law-abiding citizens who are exercising their First Amendment rights as 'extremists' who are 'not necessarily advocating violence' are in serious question here. This is not a 'report,' this is a smear designed to chill our civil rights. WE WILL NOT BE SILENT.

This morning CSPAN aired a panel discussion at USC's Annenberg School of Journalism between whistleblowers Daniel Ellsberg, Tom Drake, Jesselyn Radack (attorney for Snowden) and Robert Scheer, USC professor sponsored by the Government Accountability Project. This is a MUST SEE program. CLICK TO WATCH. One hour of your time. If you want to hear the truth about the NSA, about the Obama and other administrations, about the state of journalism now and about your future, you must watch this program.

WE ARE LOSING OUR CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC AND YOU MUST ACT TO FIGHT FOR IT. STAND UP NOW. SPEAK OUT NOW. EDUCATE YOURSELF AND OTHERS.

IT IS YOUR DUTY AS A FREE MAN OR WOMAN TO PROTECT YOUR RIGHTS. NO ONE WILL DO THIS FOR YOU. DO IT NOW, BY REFUSING THE LIES. DO IT BY DIRECTING PEOPLE TO THE TRUTH. DO IT BY HAVING THE COURAGE TO SPEAK OUT. MAKE FLYERS, SPREAD THE TRUTH.

YOU HAVE THE GUTS TO SPEAK OUT. DO IT.

MODERN COWBOYS IN NEVADA AND UKRAINE: Studies in UN Agenda 21

4/18/2014

On the same day that activists met from all over the United States for a showdown at the Bundy Corral, soldiers from the newly minted Ukrainian army rode into eastern Ukraine to take it back.

In both situations the controversy made it hard for many to tell the good guys from the bad guys. Classic Agenda 21.

Cliven Bundy and his many supporters have said that they do not recognize the federal authority over his historic grazing rights.

Eastern Ukrainians 'ethnic Russians' have said that they do not recognize the authority of the new Ukrainian government to overturn their vote to secede and join Russia.

In Ukraine, poorly prepared western Ukrainian troops in tanks rode into the east thinking that they would just take over, and got the shock of their lives. Crowds of people holding glasses of vodka and smoking cigarettes surrounded the tanks and shamed the soldiers right out of them. They clambered into the armored vehicles and drove them into the town square where they did donuts and laughed.

In Nevada, the federal snipers and Bureau of Land Management personnel pulled out when faced with hundreds of armed constitutionalists and many more on the way.

In both cases the dominant government forces have been repelled by the people. In both cases soldiers did not fire on their own people. How long will that last? Regardless of where you come down on these issues, one thing is clear. It won't be a cakewalk. The people will resist.

Regime Change is UN Agenda 21. Anything to destroy the equilibrium of the status quo. Whether it's Arab Spring or Ukraine or the United States, the goal is to gain control of power and direct it to a more technologically controllable outcome. Restricting our access to land, rights to water, property ownership, free speech, assembly, privacy--all is UN Agenda 21.

AWARENESS IS THE FIRST STEP IN THE RESISTANCE.
RESIST. 

ANOTHER CLASSIC DISINFO ARTICLE: THE DAILY BEAST

4/13/2014

As reported in the Daily Beast (click here for smear story)
"SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER

Active ‘Patriot’ Groups in the United States in 2013

The Intelligence Project identified 1,096 anti-government “Patriot” groups that were active in 2013.

Generally, Patriot groups define themselves as opposed to the “New World Order,” engage in groundless conspiracy theorizing, or advocate or adhere to extreme antigovernment doctrines. Listing here does not imply that the groups themselves advocate or engage in violence or other criminal activities, or are racist.

The list was compiled from field reports, Patriot publications, the Internet, law enforcement sources and news reports."

Democrats Against UN Agenda 21 and the Post Sustainability Institute are, again, on the Southern Poverty Law Center's list of Patriot groups. The criteria for making this list are quite interesting. The SPLC purports to identify hate groups and to advocate for those who are being discriminated against or targeted for violence. The SPLC mainly focuses on skinhead groups and anti-gay groups but they're branching out and including us in their scope. Why?

If you look at what they say above, the criteria for list selection include opposing the New World Order (does SPLC support it?), 'groundless' conspiracy theorizing (SPLC refuses to acknowledge objective reality), and advocating or adhering to 'extreme anti-government doctrines' (like life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness?).

There was a time in the past when, as gay people, we might have donated to SPLC. About 25% of their website is devoted to fundraising for themselves. They engage in spreading misinformation about UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development and are themselves representing the New World Order by targeting groups who would re-erect the guarantees of the US Constitution. Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness extends beyond racial and social lines. Our government exists to protect the individual. Our rights to free speech, to our property, to our privacy---guaranteed by the Constitution. The term 'Patriots,' according to the SPLC, is now under suspicion, and those who question government tactics and object to subversion, manipulation, privacy invasion, and 'transformation' are targeted on their list.

The Southern Poverty Law Center is a fraud and a sham. Although they have a disclaimer that they don't imply that we advocate or engage in violence or other criminal activities, or are racist they are fully aware that targeting us on their list may serve to chill our civil rights or turn people against us. They are engaging in their own brand of hate speech. It might help their fundraising but it also shines a light on their bias and willingness to go along to get along with liberty-destroying regimes. The Southern Poverty Law Center purports to have some familiarity with Nazi tactics. Perhaps too much.

LIES AND DISINFORMATION ON UN AGENDA 21 IS UN AGENDA 21

GLOBALIZATION OF CALIFORNIA CONFERENCE--May 3 in San Francisco

4/9/2014

In meetings across California, unelected and unaccountable regulators are setting up networks of regional government that are usurping local control from you and your duly elected city, county, community and other local officials. These regional bodies are not acting in the “public good” but are reinventing a government that strips property rights away from legitimate property owners and instead gives them to a chosen few under the auspices of programs such as “sustainable development”, ”smart growth” and “public-private partnerships.”

Are you a property owner? Do you value local control of your communities by your duly elected officials? If so, then the time to act is NOW!

The Globalization of California Forum brings top recognized experts together (Michael Shaw, Patrick Wood, Rosa Koire, Debbie Bacigalupi, Heather Gass, Mike Munzing, Matt Grocott, Steve Brandau) to reveal the details and the necessary actions to put a stop to it! Space is limited, so get your ticket today!

The Globalization of California Forum
Saturday, May 3, 2014 – 10:00AM to 5:30PM
Treasure Island, San Francisco Bay
Doors open at 9:30AM for Check-in & Registration
Lunch and Information Packet included
Individual, Family and Group Tickets Available

eventbrite ticket

$2 Billion Bet on Your Virtual Future: Facebook and Virtual Reality is Agenda 21

3/27/2014

Facebook's CEO Mark Zuckerberg is betting $2 billion that you'll prefer virtual reality to the real thing. He has just invested in Oculus, a company that makes headsets for virtual reality personal imaging. The 'story' is that this is all about gaming but it's not a big leap to virtual classrooms, virtual travel, virtual relationships, and virtual meals. What does this mean for your future?

It's not a new idea to say that internet use is habit-forming. You've also experienced or witnessed the gaming 'addiction' either personally or in your family members. Now get ready for obsession on steroids with virtual reality. When you put on this headset your body will respond to the 3D images as if they are truly reality. If you're wearing it and you look down you'll see your feet -- but they'll be the feet of the supermodel you see when you look in the virtual mirror. When you look up you'll see the cosmos through the space capsule window, or the Sistine Chapel ceiling as you walk alone through the building. Lift the virtual fork to your virtual mouth and eat the gorgeous meal in Paris. Look into the eyes of your virtual partner as you profess eternal love. Walk across a tightrope over a deep canyon. Kill an enemy.

Your palms will sweat, your heart will beat faster, your eyes will dilate, your lungs will suck in air more deeply, and your nervous system will respond. Although your physical responses with the current virtual reality headset are not exactly like they would be if the experience were real, the future will most certainly include smells and sensations---like the 'Feelies' described in Huxley's Brave New World. The addition of these sense stimulators will fool the brain.

Yes, it's a movie, a 3D virtual surround movie, but your body will respond as if it were real. Your brain will believe that it is real. It will, in fact, be far more appealing than your actual un-virtual life. The stimulation your brain receives will be thrilling, and you'll be content to sit strapped in your chair living your virtual life. Is this a fantasy? No. Look at this 1978 study in Science Magazine stating that Rhesus monkeys, when caged and given the choice of food or cocaine, chose cocaine 'almost exclusively.' The addiction to virtual experience may likely lead to people sitting at their computers starving to death in their Smart Growth unit. Who needs living space or transportation when they're strapped to a virtual reality unit? Who needs relationships or families or pets when virtual reality is so much more satisfying and uncomplicated? Children will be extremely vulnerable to this fabulous new life---virtual teachers in virtual classrooms will teach limited learning for lifelong labor. Rewards for correct behavior may be virtual, but the brain and body will accept them as real. Real personal interaction will be miserably inadequate when compared to the ecstatic joys of virtual life.

According to Stanford Professor Jeremy Bailenson, whose book Infinite Reality examines all aspects of virtual reality research, the time is coming when holograms will be in use by average people--you'll be able to take a virtual walk with a friend in real time and that friend will appear to be with you. You won't be able to trust your eyes when you see what appears to be reality. There will be no objective reality.

Just like you asked for Facebook, and begged for smart phones, and jumped on Second Life, you'll love the novelty of virtual reality---until it is no longer a novelty. It will be a health care requirement to provide virtual reality to the handicapped, it will be used to perform mental health assessments, it will be a virtual teacher and a virtual classroom to billions, it will be used to keep prisoners quiet, it will be used to dumb down and pacify the populace. It is the face of UN Agenda 21.

Can you resist or will you accept it as an inevitability?

RESIST SOCIAL MANIPULATION.
THIS IS UN AGENDA 21.

AFTER SNOWDEN: JOURNALISTS FEEL THE CHILL

2/28/2014

In late January, 2014, CSPAN aired a Columbia University School of Journalism panel discussion entitled Journalism After Snowden (click to watch) It was re-aired a couple of nights ago and I watched it, spellbound. Notably, the panel included the editor in chief of The Guardian Newspaper (USA branch) Janine Gibson; the executive editor of the New York Times, Jill Abramson; Cass Sunstein, Obama's former head of Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs and Harvard Law professor who was recently appointed by the President to an NSA review panel (this panel determined that powers of the FISA Court [secret court] should be strengthened).

The Guardian-USA was the first newspaper to be contacted by Snowden and broke the story. Janine Gibson, editor in chief, stated that had the information been given to the Guardian in England it would never have reached the public. The newspaper's hard drives were destroyed under pressure from the British government. If she had not collaborated with the New York Times, said Gibson, the information would have been lost.

New York Times executive editor Jill Abramson stated in as intense a way as possible that journalists are under threat of prosecution if they publish a story because THE GOVERNMENT HAS CHANGED THE RULES FOR A FREE EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION. In our free society a journalist had been willing to go to jail to protect the identity of a source. This dedication to a free press has been a vital part of our republic.

According to both Abramson and Gibson, now, through technological access, the government is able to trace all contacts (electronic, telephone, mail) without demanding that a journalist identify the source. Therefore it is not possible to protect a source. Under the new regime, the NSA has made it clear that A JOURNALIST CAN BE CONSIDERED AN ACCOMPLICE. What this means to the public 'after Snowden' is that there is no free press. When a journalist can be considered to be an accomplice in an act considered to be espionage BY THE RULING REGIME, the journalist cannot report on it without endangering him or herself. The rights of journalists have been chilled. Whistleblowers, those who expose violations by government in ways that could be illegal, will not be able to get information to the public. Would the Pentagon Papers be possible now? Would the New York Times accept the documents? The NYT accepted the Pentagon Papers based on our First Amendment right to know what our government is doing. The Supreme Court decided that we had a right to know in its Pentagon Papers decision in 1971. When was that decision overturned? It wasn't.

THE RIGHT OF THE PUBLIC TO KNOW WHAT THE POLICIES OF ITS GOVERNMENT ARE, WITHOUT DANGER TO OUR FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS, HAS BEEN DESTROYED.

THIS IS UN AGENDA 21.

YOU ARE A CRIMINAL UNTIL PROVEN INNOCENT---A BEDTIME STORY

2/6/2014

Just a few days ago the Miami Herald, Florida, newspaper ran a story headlined: Lawmakers To Consider Banning Biometrics in Schools. The Pinellas County school district started using biometrics (iris scans, fingerprint scans, and palm readers...not the ones wearing turbans and earrings...) in the school cafeterias. When the Polk and Seminole County school districts instituted their own programs Florida legislators started getting the message that there was opposition to data collection on minors. Now some Florida legislators are proposing a bill to block biometric data collection in the schools.

Really? Now we need a bill to protect our first amendment rights? We need a legislator writing a bill in order to stop a school district from violating the rights of children? For the people who think that this is a tempest in a lunch bag, let me remind you that these elementary, junior, and senior high school students are a few years away from adulthood. They are being fingerprinted. Their irises are being scanned. Their palm prints are being recorded. These people have not committed a crime. Right now, in America, you only have to give your fingerprints to the 'authorities' if you commit a crime (or are accused of committing a crime). You may voluntarily give this information if you want a 'sensitive job' or a passport, but THIS ACTION IS VOLUNTARY. In Pinellas, Seminole, and Polk counties, childrens' identities are being data mined prior to the age of consent. Not only do the school officials not have the right to take their information, but I posit that their parents don't have the right to give this information to the government either. This decision is one that should be made by each individual.

Here in America, a school district bureaucrat can justify violating civil rights to privacy because “The biggest benefit of having this system is that it allows students more time to eat their lunch,” Marquez Parra said. “That’s what this is all about.”

But this is not 'what this is all about'. This is all about INVENTORY, MONITORING, AND CONTROL. This is UN Agenda 21.

RESIST.

Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2014/02/02/3909538/lawmakers-to-consider-banning.html#storylink=cpy

THE FOURTH PILLAR OF UN AGENDA 21: CULTURE

12/1/2013

Often you'll hear UN Agenda 21's primary elements referred to as a "three-legged stool": Economy, Ecology, and Social Equity. You'll see this image:

Where the elements come together in the middle is the 'sustainable' balance that is the supposed goal of the restructuring of every aspect of your life.

In 2004 a 'world congress of cities' was formed to comment on the part that 'culture' plays in re-crafting identity. Out of that congress the fourth pillar emerged: Culture.

"The Agenda 21 for culture is the first document with worldwide mission that advocates establishing the groundwork of an undertaking by cities and local governments for cultural development. The Agenda 21 for culture was agreed by cities and local governments from all over the world to enshrine their commitment to human rights, cultural diversity, sustainability, participatory democracy and creating conditions for peace.

It was approved by the 4th Forum of Local Authorities for Social Inclusion of Porto Alegre, held in Barcelona on 8 May 2004 as part of the first Universal Forum of Cultures.

United Cities and Local Governments (UCLG) adopted the Agenda 21 for culture...UCLG’s Working Group on Culture, constituted in Beijing on 9 June 2005, is the meeting point for cities, local governments and networks that place culture at the heart of their development processes."

This group, United Cities and Local Governments, says it represents half the population of the world but you've never heard of it.

So what could this mean? The fourth pillar of UN Agenda 21 is CULTURE. Think about some of what we're seeing around the world:

Across the United States, the indigenous people, Indians, are opening casinos. Indians are considered a sovereign nation within US borders but receive federal funds and assistance. Tribal heads who were not elected by tribe members are running the tribes like dictatorships and dis-enrolling members of their tribes who dare to challenge the ruling establishment of tribal councils. By the stroke of a pen an Indian becomes a non-Indian.

Cultural events often take place in rural areas, but less and less people are able to survive in their traditional rural towns. Regulations, restrictions, and outright prohibitions on timbering, fishing, ranching, and other rural pursuits has left an indelible mark on 'cultural' America. If you're not indigenous you lose your right to work your land.

The emphasis on tourism has relegated culture in many places around the world to folk dances and ethnic meals provided for the consumption of outsiders. Economies in some areas are dependent on the entertainment of these consumers of culture, and town centers are turned into pseudo-museums for their pleasure. Often authentic members of these areas are unable to afford their own 'culture' or find it to be commercialized into a caricature of the past. The preservation of these living museums may mean that anything that isn't scenic has to go away, even it means economic collapse.

Culture may be defined as modern dance and art learned and produced in a university setting with all of the requirements that academia demands. Analyzing the creation becomes the culture itself.

New rights are being granted: positive rights. Positive rights can be taken away or granted, unlike the rights we have guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Our constitutional rights are those we are born with, they can't be taken away or granted by a government -- just protected by it. UN Agenda 21 'rights' are really privileges designed as rewards and punishments.

Discrimination will extend to anything which acknowledges difference, but only when it is being done by others. You'll be a 'hater' if you note unfair advantage, manipulation, or discrimination against the traditional mainstream. Culture is something to be used as a tool in the manipulation of demographics. The emphasis on diversity, on empowering women and youth, and the poor, and others formerly less attended to by society means that culture is defined by the 'other' rather than by those who live it. It is externalized, commercialized, romanticized, and politicized for the benefit of the elitist consumer while the exploitation of the social group is carpeted over in green.

When you contemplate what culture is, you'll find yourself reflecting on agricultural, rural values; you'll think about nature and the seasons and crops; you'll think about longtime communities of friends and family; you'll think about religion and ritual; you'll contemplate courtship and marriage, and childbirth, and death. Culture is the human being's journey through life and beyond.

United Nations' Agenda 21 is a sham imitation of this. It is the green mask of concern for the continuation of life covering a goal of pushing humans into urban islands of human habitation. This densely urban life of stress and economic deprivation is 'the new poverty' or the new austerity that redefines the individual's relationship to his/her government. UN Agenda 21 empowers the regional unit, whether it's in the Americas (example: Cascadia) or Europe (Danube Region: Centrope) over the nation and its manageable, responsive units. We are becoming hapless targets of the Mega-Corporations in their rush to exploit a moveable workforce taught whatever corporations need us to know in order to produce their widgets. Huge corporations sell you what they tell you you want, and you buy it. Smart Phone? Tracking device with built-in GPS. Video Games? Sociopathic training designed to develop action without introspection. ATT or Comcast Home Security? In home video surveillance.
This is your culture now.

Merry Christmas.
CULTURE IS THE FOURTH PILLAR OF UN AGENDA 21.
Refuse to cooperate.
Expose collaborators.
RESIST.

Planned Future: UN Mercenaries

11/26/2013

This afternoon CSPAN aired a program on American defense strategy hosted by the Aspen Institute's Strategy Group. This panel discussion included former undersecretary of Defense for Policy (President Obama) Michele Flournoy, and former National Security Council member (President George HW Bush) Philip Zelikow. Both are members of the Aspen Strategy Group as are Condelezza Rice, John Podesta, Madeleine Albright, and Dianne Feinstein, to name a few. The Aspen Institute is notorious for being the think tank behind national policy. The discussion centered on how to manage a military that is expensive and getting more so.

John Negroponte, former ambassador to the UN and the first director of the National Intelligence Agency (George W. Bush) made a suggestion about an hour and 14 minutes into the discussion.

"Why," he said, "doesn't the United States do some 'capacitating' with the UN Peacekeeping Forces? It would be much cheaper. In fact, in a word, outsourcing our military requirements to the UN would be an order of magnitude cheaper."

Both former undersecretary of Defense for Policy Michele Flournoy and former National Security Council Member Philip Zelikow agreed that this would be a good idea.

So efficient! So cheap!
http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/AmericanDefe

UN Agenda 21 images from Europe

9/29/2013

UN Agenda 21 is strongly present in Europe, though few are aware of it. One hundred and seventy nine cities are members of ICLEI, including some of Europe's most populous: London, Madrid, Rome, Berlin, Amsterdam, and Copenhagen.

All European countries agreed to UN Agenda 21 at the Rio Earth Summit in 1992 (click for a link to see the plans each country made to implement UN Agenda 21). Many, like Denmark, changed their planning and zoning acts to require Local Agenda 21 implementation. Some cities, such as London and Copenhagen, have created 'iron rings' around city access points in order to charge tolls for those entering. Vehicle license plates are photographed and registered electronically, and toll charges are sent directly to vehicle owners. Surveillance, monitoring, and tracking. In the US, the Golden Gate Bridge recently switched to this system.

As countries become more and more urbanized and populations are concentrated into these centers, less people are able to understand what life is like for the farmer who struggles against Codex Alimentarius regulations for food production. Property owners have a tenuous grip on their land as restrictions on water, access to non-GMO seed, and cost pressures force competition with major corporate producers. As the local farmer loses his or her land the corporations increase their control of global systems.

The European Union has recently indicated that it wants armed drone capability for 'security and surveillance.' The European Council will decide in December 2013 whether or not to permit this increase in regional power. Regionalization, as Zbignew Brzezinski said in 1995, "is the pre-condition for...genuine globalization..because thereby we move toward larger, more stable, more cooperative units." The European Union is an example of a so-called trade agreement that morphed into the desired interim goal: Regional governance.

The upcoming Trans-Pacific Partnership (US and 12 Pacific Rim nations) plus the TransAtlantic Trade Investment Partnership (US and EU) will begin the finalization of the ultimate step in globalization. As the slideshow accompanying this article indicates, the mood of Europe is anti-nationalist imbued with the uneasiness of economic uncertainty. A perfect pre-condition for full globalization.

<<Previous