Blog Posts

TRUMP DUMPS AGENDA 21 REGIONALIZATION MASK / PARIS CLIMATE TRAP

6/1/2017

As I watched President Trump's speech today, I cheered. I think he gets it. After Angela Merkel's comment that the Paris Climate Accord is a "key agreement that shapes globalization" it is clear to all who listen that United Nations treaties and agreements are about systems inventory and control. The Paris Climate Accord is not about whether the planet heats up another 1/10 of 1 percent in 50 years. This agreement is about crippling the ability of the United States to recover from years of a collapsed economy and loss of individual certainty. This agreement is about eroding national boundaries and national sovereignty all over the world, and about strengthening the power of the United Nations and non-governmental organizations.

Although the Paris Climate Accord was never brought to the Senate for ratification it is important that it be rejected by President Trump. Agenda 21 was also not a treaty and was not brought before the Congress, except obliquely, but it was 'de facto' made binding by President Clinton who implemented it administratively and by federal pressure on the States. President Obama and Hillary Clinton had every intention of implementing the Paris Climate Accord through the usual channels: federal pressure, grants, regulations, restrictions, HUD/EPA/DOT grants and lawsuits, and bogus non-profits working the grassroots.

During President Trump's speech today he mentioned American sovereignty several times and referred to the Accord as a redistribution of wealth that favored other nations and debilitated American business. That it clearly does do so is apparent in the treatment of China and India as "developing countries" who are exempt from regulations and controls for years---years in which they will continue to grossly pollute while producing cheap goods for export to the United States.

I searched President Obama's speeches for mention of American sovereignty. I didn't find it. What I did find was his address to the United Nations General Assembly in the fall of 2016 stating that we in America 'must bind ourselves to international rules' and not fall prey to 'nationalism.' The term 'nationalism' is now equated with Hitler or isolationism. What we are protecting is not just a sense that our country has self-interests both social and economic, but our Constitution, our rule of law, our sovereignty.

By refusing to abide by the Paris Climate Accord President Trump is sending a message to those of us who have fought consistently against UN Agenda 21's message of globalization/One World Government. It takes time and effort to destroy the economy of one of the world's wealthiest nations. We are hugely in debt and struggle with homelessness, youth who feel hopeless about their future, polarization of the races exacerbated by compressed Smart Growth mega-cities, more and more drug use...we need help.

The presidency is not a popularity contest. Whether we like his personality or not is irrelevant. What is important is the health and welfare of our nation, and our freedom.

THE PARIS CLIMATE ACCORD IS UN AGENDA 21.

18 Comments

RENT CONTROL AND AGENDA 21

5/12/2017

0 Comments

We oppose rent control for a number of reasons. We support needs-based government rent subsidies like Section 8 and believe that the program should be better funded and more efficiently managed.

Rent control forces private individuals to subsidize other individuals regardless of need for an indefinite period of time. Rather than provide services for its residents, the city will penalize property owners because the city is financially unable or unwilling to pay for housing assistance services.

Property owners are referred to as greedy if they make a profit on their business but the fact that there are major costs and risks associated with property ownership is ignored.

Rent control law often exempts buildings constructed after 1995. Most small local rental property owners have older housing stock and will be disproportionately penalized by this law. The city may create arbitrary cut-offs at owner-occupied triplexes which creates a new class of property and a new issue for valuation and sale of rental property.

Rent control makes property ownership prohibitive for existing owners and reduces their property values. Transfer of multiple small parcels to one single major developer like Enterprise Community Development or LIHC is then much easier for adherents of UN Agenda 21 stack and pack housing.

Rent control does not create more affordable housing but instead encourages people to stay frozen for years in one place.

Property owners will be more likely to raise rents every year to the maximum allowable by law. When tenants move out property owners will raise the new rent as high as possible knowing that this may be the only chance they have to adjust to current market rates.

Properties that are rent controlled are less likely to be well-maintained because the property owner's expenses are rising but the rents stay the same. We don't see counties offering to freeze property taxes on rent controlled units, nor will the cities freeze water and garbage rates.

The city will create a layer of bureaucracy and a Rent Board. They plan to charge owners a certain amount per unit per year. Half of this will be passed to the tenants. Rent Boards tend to be aggressive with property owners and lenient with tenants even in cases of long term sublet arrangements where the tenant leaves and sublets to another for more money. In Berkeley this scenario is allowed to continue for a minimum of 4 years and the property owner must prove that the tenant has 'no intention' of moving back into the unit---impossible to prove.

Here in Santa Rosa there are builders with land who would like to construct apartment buildings but are blocked by the Planning Department. Reasons given have varied from not being close enough to a direct bus line to the train station, to not being within the specific plans of the downtown redevelopment areas. Although redevelopment was ended the Santa Rosa General Plan rezoned large areas of the city. Funding, politics, and building restrictions have blocked construction of housing that could be affordable.

There is an ideology espoused by rent control supporters that housing is a right and that this right should be enabled by private individuals. In order to enforce this ideology a large segment of the population will be made to pay disproportionately more than other individuals in the city.

Again, rent subsidies should be made by government based on need.

Here are two quotes that describe the direction that rent control is following:

Nazi Land Philosophy:
'The issue of land ownership is secondary; what counts is the issue of control. Private citizens, therefore, may continue to hold titles to property--so long as the state reserves to itself the unqualified right to regulate the use of their property.'
Leonard Peikoff, The Ominous Parallels, 1982

Ernst Huber, official Nazi Party spokesman, 1933:
'All property is common property. The owner is bound by the people and the Reich to the responsible management of his goods. His legal position is only justified when he satisfies this responsibility to the
community. '

This is the ultimate philosophy of UN Agenda 21.

0 Comments

DEMOCRATS WHO VOTED FOR TRUMP

11/17/2016

12 Comments

Democrats are out in the streets protesting the approaching Trump presidency. It's no surprise that they're being joined by Socialists and Anarchists who never miss a good street riot.

I can understand Democrats who feel as if they were suddenly jettisoned from the driver's seat into a free fall of confusion. They've lost their sense of being in power and want to feel that intense camaraderie and joy of righteousness they had with Obama. They need to remain connected to their cohort. I get it. They're stunned. They meet at restaurants, in the check-out line at Whole Foods, at Starbucks, at street protests, and they look into one another's faces with a wide-eyed terror. They're like children at a scary movie. They've succeeded in terrorizing themselves. Their own children are terrified and panicked as they watch their parents fall apart predicting mass deportations, loss of abortion rights, and global inundation from rising seas. And, in spite of the heavy indoctrination and social attacks, you know that many Democrats did vote for Trump. Even if they won't admit it.

During the election period I switched back and forth from MSNBC to Fox and found it to be both fascinating and disgusting. The polarization of blue and red was an outrage. I was especially disgusted by MSNBC's commitment to twist the truth in order to incite the Democrats. Democrats I talked to were basically ignorant about what Trump had actually said or done, got their information from MSNBC, and never verified with the actual source i.e. a Trump speech, press conference, statement, or interview. These were intelligent people who preferred pseudo-news and entertainment to actual verifiable information.

Why? Why are Democrats so unable to hear the truth?

They are so accustomed to being agreed with that they literally cannot hear dissent. If they're young people they've been schooled to filter out and block dissent. During the Occupy sleep-ins around the country we interviewed Occupiers and found them to be angered by mere questions that did not follow the accepted line. Anything that challenged their prepared script was too threatening and too dangerous for them to listen to. It's the New Man. It's Common Core. It's Agenda 21.

So now what?

Hopefully Trump really will start scrubbing the EPA, HUD, Interior, Transportation and other agencies of regulations that are destroying our ability to live and be productive in the United States.

Hopefully cities and counties will be exposed as Smart Growth UN Agenda 21 collaborators and will be forced by their aware citizens to rewrite their General Plans.

It will be interesting to see if undocumented / illegal immigrants in Sanctuary Cities will have to prove that they really do need sanctuary, and what happens to those cities which break federal law.

What about the US court system? Is it possible to bring justice back to the courtroom?

The pendulum has swung too far and now there may be an opportunity to block UN Agenda 21's progress. Is it too much to hope that we can bring awareness of the devastating impacts of UN Agenda 21 to the new administration? I don't know, but I believe that there is a chance. We have to take it. And as I've said to other Democrats: Ask yourself why half of the voters in this nation would vote for a President who has never even been elected to a city council. Why are people so desperate that they will elect an inexperienced billionaire to the office of President? People have been driven to this by the aggressive implementation of UN Agenda 21 in every area of America. It has to stop.

NOW TAKE THE BALL AND RUN WITH IT.

AWARENESS IS THE FIRST STEP IN THE RESISTANCE.

ACTION IS THE SECOND STEP.

12 Comments

THE BEST LACK ALL CONVICTION

7/19/2016

2 Comments

It's so easy to be manipulated. Watch as the inevitable unfolds 'for your safety.' Call it UN Agenda 21. Call it UN Agenda 2030. Call it National Security. Call it Common Core. Call it Artificial Intelligence. Call it Submission. Call it OUT. SPEAK IT. WRITE IT.

Turning and turning in the widening gyre
The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.
Surely some revelation is at hand;
Surely the Second Coming is at hand.
The Second Coming! Hardly are those words out
When a vast image out of Spiritus Mundi
Troubles my sight: somewhere in the sands of the desert
A shape with lion body and the head of a man,
A gaze blank and pitiless as the sun,
Is moving its slow thighs, while all about it
Reel shadows of the indignant desert birds.
The darkness drops again but now I know
That twenty centuries of stony sleep
Were vexed to nightmare by a rocking cradle,
And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?
-----W.B. Yeats

2 Comments

DARE TO SAY IT: ISLAM AND UN AGENDA 21

7/1/2016

5 Comments

ICLEI, International Council on Local Environmental Initiatives, the parallel government masquerading as a mere purveyor of greenhouse gas monitoring software, is a key driver in globalization.

Who sits on ICLEI's Global Executive Committee? One member is the Organization of Islamic Capitals. Islam is a standardization of systems. Religious law which is the same in all nations: Shar'iah. UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development does not allow for dissent. Neither does Islam. UN A21/SD uses the Delphi technique to propagandize populations and create a cult-like adherence to itself. You'll observe that behavior in Islam as it is clearly identified in this excellent video which I encourage you to watch. Stephen Coughlin is an intelligence expert on the Middle East and has briefed the US Joint Chiefs of Staff and high level legislators and officials on Islam.

Notice that in his presentation Coughlin is proving that through the limitations of political correctness that Military Intelligence has placed on itself, it is unable to identify the enemy. He clearly states that the term 'human rights' means 'rights of Moslems only' when it is used by the Organization of Islamic Cooperation. 'Acts of terror' are only considered violations of Islam when committed on Moslems. He notes that Secretary of State Hilary Clinton assured the Moslem world that the communitarian technique of shaming and pressure would be used on Americans who offend Islam.--implying that our first amendment right to free speech is abridged.

As you watch this video consider the implications of what you see in the context of UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development. You may agree that Islam is a perfect system for the implementation of "social equity" under UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development. What will this mean for the American Constitution? You don't have to think too hard about it to see the answer.

5 Comments

SIT-IN AT CONGRESS: FUNDRAISING STUNT

6/23/2016

0 Comments

The murders in Orlando must have looked like a good fundraising opportunity for the Democrat Party. This is the 8th 'urgent' email I've received from the Party since the sit-in. They're all the same. Take a look:

Dear Rosa:
John Lewis emailed you directly. (!!!)

That’s how EXTREMELY important this is.

He’s just led an HISTORIC, INSPIRING, UNPRECEDENTED sit-in to demand a vote on gun safety. And he asked for your help:

They protested for TWENTY-SIX LONG HOURS, but Republicans refused to lift a finger.

WE. MUST. DEFEAT. THEM.

We need to get 21,673 more gifts in the door today to kick them out of office.

Will you stand with John Lewis and pitch in $1?

ALL GIFTS TRIPLE-MATCHED
Chip in $1 immediately >>
Chip in $35 immediately >>
Chip in $50 immediately >>
Chip in $100 immediately >>
Chip in $250 immediately >>
Or donate another amount >>
Thank you,

DCCC (DEMOCRATIC CENTRAL COMMITTEE)

0 Comments

Measure AA Passed, or did it? Regionalization Destroys Your Voice

6/15/2016

0 Comments

MANIPULATION AND GREEN RHETORIC

Measure AA was declared a winner on June 8, 2016 in the San Francisco Bay Area. For the very first time millions of people in 9 counties and 101 cities voted as a single unit to create the vehicle for their own demise. I think it's safe to say that nearly all of them were ignorant about the consequences.

Not to be dramatic, but this is truly the next step in the implementation of UN Agenda 21. Regionalization.

Measures are supposed to require a 2/3 vote to pass.
But by bundling all 9 counties together the more populous counties outvoted the smaller ones and overturned their 'NO' votes. In 4 of the 9 counties Measure AA did not pass. But that did not matter. So now a new entity has been created, a political entity that is actually a political/public relations money-generator, a new entity that cements the power of the mega-city, the mega-region.

All the promoters had to say was that they were 'Saving The Bay' and then spend millions of dollars on advertising to push this fairly obscure legal charade on the hapless green-washed dupes. Yep, if you objected you were branded a heartless, cheap, polluting despoiler of the environment who cared nothing about wildlife and the planet. The New Man was manipulated and fooled into the sideshow of the Green Mask. Easily.
Why? Because the New Man is designed to accept it from early childhood. The New Man is literally brainwashed to be unable to hear an opposing viewpoint. The rhetoric of Measure AA is typical and we'll be seeing a lot more of it in the future, NO MATTER WHERE WE LIVE.

REGIONALIZATION IS UN AGENDA 21

0 Comments

NO ON MEASURE AA: NOT IN CALIFORNIA? YOU'RE NEXT

5/24/2016

1 Comment

MEASURE AA IS A TROJAN HORSE. VOTE NO

Not in California? Here's your future--Help us fight it NOW.

Never before have the 9 counties of the San Francisco Bay Area been taxed as a single entity. Why? Because they are NOT A SINGLE ENTITY.
THEY ARE NINE SEPARATE COUNTIES.

So what?

THIS IS A TEST. The environmental issue is a smokescreen, a GREEN MASK, for the major play here: empowering AND FUNDING a new form of government, regional, that destroys representative government. What does this mean for you? The new 'region', the Bay Area, becomes the political and financial gorilla that crushes your ability as a voter to control your life. Instead of working with local, county, and state representatives you'll be subjected to the power of the OneBayArea: 9 counties / 101 cities where you have no meaningful representation. This is what happened with PlanBayArea. We are suing to stop this, but we lost at Superior Court and are appealing, with your help.

Measure AA is a new FIRST-OF-ITS-KIND Parcel Tax in the San Francisco Bay Area. The "emergency" that the SF Bay is facing, the environmental devastation in the SF Bay, you are told, must be dealt with, and $500 million is urgently needed. You were told that this tax concept is new because people of the 9 counties around the San Francisco Bay will have every one of their parcels assessed a $12 tax annually to 'save the Bay.' The ballot measure will is on the June 2016 ballot so that the people of these counties can essentially vote together to empower an obscure new agency (see below*) that has been taken over by powerful Silicon Valley Agenda 21 corporate interests.

The core danger of regionalization is that you have no vote, no voice, no ability to influence this unelected board / commission. Regions break jurisdictional boundaries and destroy representative government. A region is a supra-governmental organization. Full globalization can only happen with the interim building block: regionalization. The same group sponsoring this, Silicon Valley Regional Forum, hosted futurist Paul Saffo recently, who said that in 50 years the United States would be erased and replaced with Mega-Regions. What voice, what power, will you have if this goes forward? None. These people have an agenda: UN Agenda 21. Before you scoff at it and roll your eyes, take a moment and take a look at the truth behind Sustainable Development. This is not about recycling. This is about full globalization, mega-regions, and handing what little power you have left to an unelected board with a 'vision.'

Now those Silicon Valley corporations that have been using their money to establish their power will be using YOUR money to maintain and grow their power.

VOTE NO ...WHILE YOU STILL CAN.
IDENTIFY IT. EXPOSE IT. RESIST.
FIGHT UN AGENDA 21
THIS IS WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE

QUOTE FROM THE SF BAY RESTORATION AUTHORITY WEBSITE
*"The San Francisco Bay Restoration Authority(Authority) is a new regional government agency charged with raising and allocating resources for the restoration, enhancement, protection, and enjoyment of wetlands and wildlife habitat in the San Francisco Bay and along its shoreline. The Authority was created by the California legislature in 2008 with the enactment of AB 2954 (Lieber). It seeks to:

Educate the community on the benefits of Bay restoration
Solicit feedback on priorities and projects throughout the Bay Area
Evaluate support for a November 2014 regional parcel tax measure"

Look at this new agency. It is a propaganda organ designed to fund regionalization---no other purpose. This is Agenda 21...HAPPENING NOW

1 Comment

LAWSUIT AGAINST UN AGENDA 21 UPDATE!

3/9/2016

0 Comments

LAWSUIT UPDATE FROM FREEDOM ADVOCATES
Plaintiff/Appellant Reply to ABAG

Michael Shaw of FreedomAdvocates.org and GlobalizationofCalifornia.com and Rosa Koire of The Post Sustainability Institute and Democrats Against U.N. Agenda 21 (the “Plaintiffs and Appellants”) filed the Reply Brief in the Appeal in their California state court case against the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG). The lawsuit seeks the negation of ABAG’s Plan Bay Area - the $300 billion dollar plan to remake the San Francisco Bay Area.

The One Bay Area/Plan Bay Area program is the prototype Agenda 21 restructure of local government to change how Americans are expected to live. For information on ABAG and the One Bay Area Plan, see a List of Resources here.
ABAG is an extra constitutional layer of government. It is unelected and unaccountable. It is a Council of Governments (COG), a national format designed to “transform” America. ABAG has planned to direct over $300 billion to the One Bay Area/Plan Bay Area ‘smart growth’ program. California state's commitment to ABAG’s Plan Bay Area will lead to:
• the restriction of individual mobility
• the control of and limitations on single family housing
• a gigantic commitment to a high concentration of stack and pack housing

The Reply Brief, the third and final document in the One Bay Area/Plan Bay Area Lawsuit Appeal was filed in the California Appellate Court on February 16, 2016. The Brief lays out several powerful arguments that dismantle ABAG’s response and demonstrate that Plan Bay Area is in fact, unfeasible. In conclusion, we request that the trial court judgment be reversed, and that a peremptory writ of mandate be issued directing ABAG to rescind their approval of Plan Bay Area.

Below are two key points from the Reply Brief:

The mandates of S.B. 375 are clear and unambiguous:
California S.B. 375 unequivocally requires ABAG to adopt a plan that “will reduce the greenhouse gas emissions from automobiles and light trucks....” The Legislative mandate of S.B. 375 is plain and unambiguous, yet the trial court effectively rewrote this Legislative mandate to require only that the Plan can bereasonably expected to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to CARB’s (California Air Resources Board) targets. This reinterpretation of the direct language of S.B. 375 allows something closer to what ABAG has actually adopted. However, ABAG tacitly admits that Plan Bay Area will not meet the reduction targets. ABAG engaged the services of an independent consultant, Economic & Planning Services, Inc. (EPS), to assess the feasibility of Plan Bay Area. According to the Feasibility Report produced by EPS, Plan Bay area falls well short of the statutorily required CARB greenhouse gas emission targets.
The Court is not in the business of fortune telling:
The myriad political, legislative and financing assumptions built into Plan Bay Area render it unfeasible as the mechanism to achieve CARB’s greenhouse gas emission reduction targets. Plan Bay Area rests on assumptions about future legislative actions and cannot succeed without seismic shifts in California’s political and economic landscape, including the repeal of Proposition 13. [California Proposition 13 is an amendment to the CA Constitution enacted in 1978 that reduced property tax rates and restricted annual increases of the assessed value of real property. It has been called the "third rail" (meaning "untouchable subject") of California politics.] The EPS Feasibility Report commissioned by ABAG documents that Plan Bay Area cannot achieve the emissions reduction required by S.B. 375 unless redevelopment agencies or their equivalent are reinstituted; Proposition 13 is repealed or substantially weakened; and new statewide infrastructure financing is provided. ABAG fails to acknowledge that, as is highlighted in the Feasibility Report, the existence of Proposition 13 is not just an obstacle to the Plan’s achievement of its objectives, it is a “major” obstacle. Any assertion that the Plan is “likely” to achieve its objectives, or “can reasonably be expected” to do so rests on a major upheaval in California’s long-standing property tax structure occurring in the foreseeable future. ABAG provides no evidence to support their assumption that the “major obstacle” presented by Proposition 13 will go away, and thus fail to demonstrate that Plan Bay Area will achieve the objectives required for compliance with S.B. 375.

We (the Plaintiffs/Appellants) evaluate 5 other reasons why the Appellate Court should reverse the Trial Court’s ruling. Read the entire Reply Brief here, and review the court history of the litigation at GlobalizationofCalifornia.com.

If ABAG gets what it wants, Southern California will be subjected to a similar plan primarily though the COGs 'SCAG' (Southern California Association of Governments) and 'SANDAG' (San Diego Association of Governments), and so on across the state and country....

HELP STOP One Bay Area/Plan Bay Area! As the battle continues, be forewarned that additional funds will be necessary, as the case will need to proceed beyond the California Appellate Court. Certainly the case will be presented to the State and/or Federal Supreme Court by the losing party, and we must be ready! For information on methods for contributing funds toward the lawsuit, click here.

0 Comments

GUEST POST by VICKY DAVIS...MISSION ACCOMPLISHED? YOU DECIDE

2/28/2016

0 Comments

The following is an important guest post by Vicky Davis from her Technocratic Tyranny site:

"State Department’s Mission: Coup d’etat
Posted By: Vicky on: February 27 2016
In: Environment, Featured, Government, History, International, North American Union, Refugees
3 Comments

On July 21, 1993, Tim Wirth gave a talk to employees of the State Department on the new direction for State. Wirth explained that for the last 50 years the organizing principle for the United States had been the Cold War. The end of the Cold War left a vacuum and the Department of State needed to define a new mission and a new organizing principle for the Department of State.
The world revolved around the Cold War. For the most part, it was remote from domestic life in the United States because the “war” – was nation-state against nation-state and the players in the spy game were military, the CIA, and the State Department acting mostly in secret. Only the propaganda reached the public and the main message was be afraid – be very afraid.
Wirth announced that a new unit was being established within the Department of State to define the new mission and to establish the organizational structure to carry it out. Wirth was appointed to head up the new unit which was the Office of Global Affairs. The new mission would be comprised of promoting and advocating for:

Democracy & Human Rights
Population – reduction
Environment
Sustainable Development

The clue that the new mission had been in the planning for a long time was when Tim Wirth mentioned the Global 2000 Report and a “basket of issues”. The production of the Global 2000 Report was ordered by Jimmy Carter and the “basket of issues” refers to the Helsinki Final Act that was signed by Gerald Ford in 1975. The following are links to prior research that will begin to explain a little about both but I have a lot more than just these two:
Discovering History: The Helsinki Final Act, A New World Coming into View
The Smart Grid: Rest of the Story, Part 5, The Nut… Farmer from Georgia
Those two references are prima facie evidence of premeditation in what has been an attempted coup d’etat on the nation-state we know as the United States. When the implications of that evidence are combined with what Tim Wirth had to say concerning working with multilateral organizations and the development of domestic constituencies to advocate for State Department policies, it’s really no different than a foreign power attempting a coup d’etat on the United States.
The State Department has no business operating domestically. Since the Refugee Resettlement program is a program of the United Nations through the State Department, it has to be considered that this is a State Department move to build their constituency. Their constituencies are foreigners – not Americans. That’s treason.
Of course I’m not saying that on the basis one appearance on a C-Span program 23 years ago. I’m saying it on the basis of my years of research since ~ 2003. The following is one piece of the puzzle that supports what I’m saying:
Samuel “Sandy Burgler” Berger: Nexus between 9/11 and the North American Union (NAU).
I took a clip of what I thought were the most significant things Tim Wirth had to say but the entire one hour program should be viewed.

0 Comments

FIRST KNOW THIS: YOUR ENEMY IS RUTHLESS.

2/6/2016

1 Comment

Here's a major alert that you will appreciate no matter where you live...whether in the US or another nation: Regional Governance is NOW. Why should you care about something that sounds a bit dull? Because right now you have the shreds of the ability to influence what happens to you. When regional governance is fully in place AND FUNDED, you will sliding down that official slope to totalitarian authoritarian rule. That's it. It's really that simple. Official regionalization, funded, takes us from the conceptual to the actual. From ideology to REALITY. Now read this:

Last month the San Jose Mercury News and other news outlets reported on a new FIRST-OF-ITS-KIND Parcel Tax in the San Francisco Bay Area. The "emergency" that the SF Bay is facing, the environmental devastation in the SF Bay, you are told, must be dealt with, and $500 million is urgently needed. You were told that this tax concept is new because people of the 9 counties around the San Francisco Bay will have every one of their parcels assessed a $12 tax annually to 'save the Bay.' A ballot measure will be on the June 2016 ballot so that the people of these counties can essentially vote together to empower an obscure new agency (see below*) that has been taken over by powerful Silicon Valley Agenda 21 corporate interests.

Never before have the 9 counties been taxed as a single entity. Why? Because they are NOT A SINGLE ENTITY. THEY ARE NINE SEPARATE COUNTIES.

So what?

THIS IS A TEST. The environmental issue is a smokescreen, a GREEN MASK, for the major play here: empowering AND FUNDING a new form of government, regional, that destroys representative government. What does this mean for you? The new 'region', the Bay Area, becomes the political and financial gorilla that crushes your ability as a voter to control your life. Instead of working with local, county, and state representatives you'll be subjected to the power of the OneBayArea: 9 counties / 101 cities where you have no meaningful representation. This is what happened with PlanBayArea. We are suing to stop this, but we lost at Superior Court and are appealing, with your help.

The core danger of regionalization is that you have no vote, no voice, no ability to influence this unelected board / commission. Regions break jurisdictional boundaries and destroy representative government. A region is a supra-governmental organization. Full globalization can only happen with the interim building block: regionalization. The same group sponsoring this, Silicon Valley Regional Forum, hosted futurist Paul Saffo recently, who said that in 50 years the United States would be erased and replaced with Mega-Regions. What voice, what power, will you have if this goes forward? None. These people have an agenda: UN Agenda 21. Before you scoff at it and roll your eyes, take a moment and take a look at the truth behind Sustainable Development. This is not about recycling. This is about full globalization, mega-regions, and handing what little power you have left to an unelected board with a 'vision.'

Now those Silicon Valley corporations that have been using their money to establish their power will be using YOUR money to maintain and grow their power.

VOTE NO ...WHILE YOU STILL CAN.
IDENTIFY IT. EXPOSE IT. RESIST.
FIGHT UN AGENDA 21
THIS IS WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE

QUOTE FROM THE SF BAY RESTORATION AUTHORITY WEBSITE
*"The San Francisco Bay Restoration Authority(Authority) is a new regional government agency charged with raising and allocating resources for the restoration, enhancement, protection, and enjoyment of wetlands and wildlife habitat in the San Francisco Bay and along its shoreline. The Authority was created by the California legislature in 2008 with the enactment of AB 2954 (Lieber). It seeks to:

Educate the community on the benefits of Bay restoration
Solicit feedback on priorities and projects throughout the Bay Area
Evaluate support for a November 2014 regional parcel tax measure"

Look at this new agency. It is a propaganda organ designed to fund regionalization---no other purpose. This is Agenda 21...HAPPENING NOW

1 Comment

BEHIND THE GREEN MASK: UN AGENDA 21 placed in UC Davis Radical Pamphlet/Political Right Wing Collection

11/3/2015

8 Comments

The University of California at Davis Library has placed my book, BEHIND THE GREEN MASK: UN Agenda 21, in its Political Right Wing Pamphlet Collection. Rather than holding the book in its open stacks, the book is for use within the library only, and is held within a larger Radical Pamphlet Collection. This obviously indicates to any student who would read it that the book is considered to be a radical, dangerous, conspiracy book that is only to be read as an example of something that goes against the values of sane, intelligent university-goers.

Take a look below at the Special Collections information on how they developed the Far Right Collection. They reference vicious attacks on gays, Jews, African-Americans and others, and the publications that influenced the attackers, and state that the purpose of the Collection is to educate university students on the ideology of extreme rightwing groups. The following information is directly copied from this link to the UC Davis Library (book link), Special Collections Far Right Collection (link)

This is an outrage. The fact that the book names their secret plan and shows you how to find it in your town somehow qualifies this book as a rightwing hate document.
___________________
Author
Koire, Rosa.

Title
Behind the green mask : U.N. agenda 21 / Rosa Koire.

Published
Santa Rosa, CA : Post Sustainability Institute Press, c2011.

Description
168 p. : ill. ; 23 cm.

Call no.
Shields Special Collections P-008 99:4 Lib Use Only

Other title
U.N. agenda 21

Title Sub.
Agenda 21.

Subject
Sustainable development -- Political aspects -- United States.

City planning and redevelopment law -- California -- Santa Rosa.

Conspiracy theories.

Local Added Entry
Walter Goldwater Radical Pamphlet Collection.
Political Right Wing Pamphlet Collection.

ISBN
9780615494548
---------------------------------------
UC Davis Library
Special Collections
Political Book and Pamphlet Collections
Development of the Far Right Collection
The development of the rightwing component of Special Collections took on a new meaning and significance to the Library staff when, in 1999, during a period that has come to be been called the "Summer of Hate", two Central Valley brothers, Matthew and Tyler Williams, firebombed three synagogues in Sacramento, including the destruction of the library of the oldest synagogue in the West, which had contained thousands of historic books and documents. This was followed a few weeks later by the brothers' murder of a gay couple, Gary Matson (a UCD alumnus in Environmental Horticulture) and his partner Winfield Mowder, in Redding, California. When the brothers were captured, the police found in their possession, (in addition to their hit list of further murder targets in the Sacramento area), a collection of pamphlets published by various extreme rightwing religious groups. A search which was done at the time by the Library staff revealed that these publications were virtually unattainable in libraries anywhere in the country, meaning that there was no ready means of access for scholars and researchers to study this material.
These incidents were followed a few weeks later by the shooting in Los Angeles of four children and staff members in a child care facility run by the North Valley Jewish Center in the San Fernando Valley. When the shooter, Buford Furrow, was captured, the police discovered in the truck of his car, a copy of white supremacist Ben Kassen's book The White Man's Bible advocating a "racial holy war" in the United States. Again, a search was done at the time and it was found that at that point in time, a copy of 1981 book was not available in research libraries. This resulted in a renewed emphasis on acquiring examples of publications of these groups and individuals whose words had inspired so much hate and violence, yet whose works were largely unavailable for study. These efforts, under the general direction of the Associate University Librarian for Collections, led to the Library building over the next few years a collection of over 2,000 pamphlets from extreme right groups, as well as the acquisitions of some hundreds of books, and a number of video and audiotapes produced by these groups. For a number of these publications, UC Davis is the only library in the United States to own a copy.
Taken as a whole, the collection is one of only a few such collections in the country, and offers a rare window into the world of political, cultural, and religious extremism in America. It is important to remember that political and religious extremism has had a significant impact on American history from the days of the Salem witch trials, to the years of Klan lynchings, to the more recent bombings of the Oklahoma City Federal Building and the destruction of the World Trade Towers, with its resultant killing of thousands of innocent people. In order for students and scholars to understand these darker chapters in human history it is necessary from them to have access to works and words that have inspired these actions. It is for this purpose that Special Collections houses such collections.
These collections have been used to support the research and teaching needs of classes studying "Conspiracy Theories in Twentieth Century America." The students examined (1) the writings of the white supremacist movement, (2) anti-Semitic works such as the writings of holocaust denial proponents, and (3) texts on racism including scarce tracts from the anti-integrationist "citizens councils" of the 1950's and 1960's.

8 Comments

YOU SEE IT IN YOUR TOWN. NOW WHAT?

10/24/2015

0 Comments

Here are a couple of comments I received recently from friends of yours:

"I live in Syracuse NY. I have seen you on Glenn Beck and your
youtube videos and love what you are doing to stop Agenda 21. Syracuse has been slowing implementing this plan and just this last week the city and the county put together a plan to merge the city and the county. The Economic Development Committee are the ones that suggested it to get $500 million in state funding. They are proposing a referendum for the November 2016 ballot. The funny thing is they have yet to say what this means. Will they use it just to merge gov't to make it more efficient. I am organizing groups to oppose this and vote this down next November. I would love if you could come to our area at some point to help educate us more on what this merger could mean for our individual rights. I will just say that my father was a WWII veteran and always spoke about how our rights could be taken away and he was referring to things like Agenda 21 more than just enemies outside our borders. "

"I am from Willmar Minnesota, a town of about 20,000 people. We have a huge problem with private groups trying to circumvent the city council and trying to make policy. Two groups named Vision 2040 and Moving Willmar Forward!! Listening to your videos really hit home! Agenda 21 is exactly what is happening in Willmar. These groups got the current Mayor elected and he is trying to push their ideas. It's really crazy that his latest idea was to build market rate apartments downtown so people that work downtown could walk to work!! These apartments would be funded by taxpayer money!! Thank you for all of you research!! I would love to have you come and speak in Willmar!! We really need your help!!"

Now that you see it, what will you do? It is imperative that you raise awareness in your city. Please take a look at WHAT CAN I DO on this website....and then do it! I would love to be everywhere and assist, but I can't do that. And I am just like you, a person who saw Agenda 21, understood what I was seeing, and is taking action to raise awareness and fight it worldwide....WITH YOUR HELP.

Remember that you have power. You are brave, intelligent, and dedicated to your liberty. It's hard work but you can do it, and you can find others to work with you.

AWARENESS IS THE FIRST STEP IN THE RESISTANCE.
ACTION IS THE SECOND STEP.

0 Comments

THEY SAID IT, THEY MEAN IT. THEY'RE DOING IT. READ THE DIRECT QUOTE #AGENDA21

10/18/2015

2 Comments

"Agenda 21 is a comprehensive plan of action to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organizations of the United Nations System, Governments, and Major Groups in every area in which human impacts on the environment." quote from the first page of UN Agenda 21.

A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF ACTION. A WORLDWIDE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF ACTION. This is real, it is something that you can stop. You need to work on this locally. You can do it. You're not alone. The entire world and the human spirit is with you.

STAND UP. SPEAK OUT. REFUSE TO COOPERATE.
EXPOSE LOCAL COLLABORATORS IN THIS ELECTION YEAR.
STOP UN AGENDA 21/ SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

2 Comments

RESIDENTIAL CAP AND TRADE FOR WATER---COMING YOUR WAY

10/15/2015

0 Comments

We've been keeping our eyes on a pilot project here in Sonoma County, CA that is being replicated across the world: Do It Yourself Cap and Trade for WATER. (click here to read our earlier article) Yes, that's right, for WATER. You will get an allotment and will be able to trade your excess water or buy water from those who don't use as much. This is a RESIDENTIAL CAP AND TRADE PROGRAM. You'll be in the market to buy water from your neighbors---and a private company will run the water exchange, for a price. Guess what? Our county water district was given a grant for this pilot program. Who gave them the grant? A private corporation affiliated with the corporation running the program. MANIPULATION. The corporation basically gave the money to the county which gave that same money back to the corporation...why? To implement this program.

Here's the corporation that is running it: SmartMARKETS.
From their website:
"Save & Trade – The Killer Application Energizing The Smart GridSmartMarkets does not touch physical water and electricity. Infrastructure remains controlled by the utility`s seasoned experts. Yet we transform how customers define and use those resources.
SmartMarkets has developed a patent-pending “Save & Trade” meter, conversion mechanism & Web 2.0 trading platform. This platform allows residential and commercial end users to own, save, accumulate and trade clearly defined water and energy efficiency credits, or EcoSharesSM.
"A Comparative Advantage – Connecting Consumers to The Grid With ValueExisting ‘smart meters’ allow consumers to monitor use and/or send data to a ‘smart grid.’ Such initiatives are helpful, but fall short by failing to harness one unlimited resource in the race to conserve resources: human greed. Only SmartMartkets’ vertically integrated trading system offers powerful incentives to reduce demand. In short, ‘smart meters’ and ‘smart grids’ need ‘smart markets’ to succeed!
"Accumulated EcoShares are simple to track and trade: balances can be found online and on your monthly utility statement. They may be monitored as easily as air miles, earned as regularly as credit card loyalty points each time water is saved, and exchanged as transparently as trading NASDAQ shares online.
"SmartMarkets` disruptive business model empowers recession-weary consumers to conserve scarce resources, save money, and earn extra income through a transparent and accountable process open to all on an equal basis. Soon, water utilities will no longer provide water, but rather provide “real liquidity”, while electric utilities can finally provide “power to the people”. "

Are you concerned about this? You should be. You'll be subject to artificial scarcity and manipulation of the water market..and they do it for the energy market, too. It's coming to your area. Check to see if there is a pilot program now with your water district. Fight it.
This is UN Agenda 21.

0 Comments

<<Previous

Forward>>

TRUMP DUMPS AGENDA 21 REGIONALIZATION MASK / PARIS CLIMATE TRAP

RENT CONTROL AND AGENDA 21

DEMOCRATS WHO VOTED FOR TRUMP

THE BEST LACK ALL CONVICTION

DARE TO SAY IT: ISLAM AND UN AGENDA 21

SIT-IN AT CONGRESS: FUNDRAISING STUNT

Measure AA Passed, or did it? Regionalization Destroys Your Voice

NO ON MEASURE AA: NOT IN CALIFORNIA? YOU'RE NEXT

LAWSUIT AGAINST UN AGENDA 21 UPDATE!

GUEST POST by VICKY DAVIS...MISSION ACCOMPLISHED? YOU DECIDE

FIRST KNOW THIS: YOUR ENEMY IS RUTHLESS.

BEHIND THE GREEN MASK: UN AGENDA 21 placed in UC Davis Radical Pamphlet/Political Right Wing Collection

YOU SEE IT IN YOUR TOWN. NOW WHAT?

THEY SAID IT, THEY MEAN IT. THEY'RE DOING IT. READ THE DIRECT QUOTE #AGENDA21

RESIDENTIAL CAP AND TRADE FOR WATER---COMING YOUR WAY

And the winner is...

Archives

Categories