I just spoke to a group in the next county over--flew back at 4 am from another state just so I could be on time to speak for the Marin Coalition.  Although they had invited me, there had been some contention between the board members as to whether or not they wanted me, and I received an extremely rude and accusatory email from a board member who was ignorant about UN Agenda 21 and just wanted to fight.  I considered refusing to come but I had already committed to it and the majority of the board wanted me.  So I went.

There were just 50 or so people there.

There were some rude interruptions from the group as I spoke but I dealt with them and went on.  At the end of my speech a woman in the audience accused me of not having integrity because I 'took money' from the state for years as an employee even though I 'knew what was going on with Agenda 21.'  She said that because I supported the use of eminent domain I was a hypocrite.  I responded by noting her total ignorance because she had obviously arrived at the event via a public road and this was certainly acquired by eminent domain.  I explained that there is a difference between eminent domain used for a public use and the use of eminent domain to choose winners and losers in redevelopment, and in transportation tax subsidies used to pay for for-profit mixed use projects and infrastructure supporting it.  I also said that I was proud of my career and had absolutely nothing to apologize for.

In fact her comments, which were extensive, aggressive, hateful, and incorrect were a personal attack on me.  She, a member of this group's board, did not dispute any of the factual information I had presented in my speech.  Instead she attacked me.  This is a technique used to chill free speech by those who are trying to shut down the truth.  No one in the entire group said a word as we sparred.  I was disgusted.  She was the only African-American person in the room.  I mention this because I wonder if it had any impact on this group of white, middle class, middle aged people who sat silently while a guest who had traveled thousands of miles to speak at their invitation was abused in front of them.  Did they think they'd be infringing on her free speech rights if they told her that she was out of line? Apparently as she was leaving the event she told others that I am 'racist.' Maybe I should have accused her of gay-bashing.  Or bullying.  

UPDATE:
The woman who attacked me, Regina Carey, is on the Democratic Central Committee for Marin County.  When she was running for that position, according to the voter's guidebook, she identified herself as a civil rights activist and said her occupation was: Community Volunteer.  She is president of the Social Justice Center of Marin.  Wonder if she had an 'agenda?' Funny thing--I was attacked by a Democratic Central Committee in Virginia--they said I wasn't really a Democrat and that I was just pretending to be one so that the Tea Party would like me.  Here's my blog post  on it. http://www.democratsagainstunagenda21.com/1/post/2011/11/what-the-democrats-in-virginia-have-to-say-about-rosa.html 

Guess what?  In yet another disgusting display of adventures into human nature we have the true story of the XYZ army during the XYZ War.  Story goes that the XYZ, not wishing to use more soldiers than necessary to guard their prisoners of war, decided to cull out the independent, active prisoners and place them under guard.  The others, the passive ones, hardly needed any guarding at all---they went along with the program.  So, what did the XYZ find when they separated the two groups?  That a mere 5% of the prisoners were the independent, active types.  Five percent.

There are 300,000,000 people in the US.  Five percent is 15,000,000.  Let's conservatively figure half of that for those who aren't going to just sit around and let themselves be Delphi'd in consensus meetings, pushed around by their City Councils, told that they have to agree to lose their private property rights to redevelopment projects, shamed into watching while their neighbors are bullied by Community Oriented Police measures, and flattered into mandatory volunteer programs for local non-profits designed to dictate their life choices.

Yes, that's about SEVEN AND A HALF MILLION PEOPLE in the United States.  That's seven times the population of San Francisco. About twice the population of Chicago.  About equal to New York.  Remember that when you go to a 'visioning meeting' put on by the regional transportation authority and local government.  You are just one of millions of people across the nation who are standing up every day and saying 'We will not be bullied into silence. We object to being told that we are a threat to the planet if we live in a house and drive a car.  We know that this is just a smokescreen for the plan to run a total information network designed for maximum control of our lives.  This is the biggest public relations stunt in the history of the world, and we are not going to go passively.'  And remember:  Seven and a half million is only two and a half percent--it is half of the number of people who would be active and have the guts to object.  A small percentage, but a big number.  Will you be part of the Resistance?

Speak up, speak out, reach out to those who will be bitterly disappointed to see that the vision of a perfect world of no carbon emissions and smiling people is a sham.  A manipulation.  An artificial construct designed to direct whole populations to a pre-determined outcome.  The obedient, passive, unquestioning mass of consumers ready to turn on their neighbors and report.  Is that what we want for our going forward?

Do you have the guts to stand up when you see something that is wrong?  Or are you going to just go along to get along?  Decide now.  WHAT DOES IT TAKE? 
15 Comments
 
 
Here's a note I just received from Iowa.  Peaceful meetings where citizens are raising their voices to demand answers are being entered by men carrying guns in an effort to intimidate us.  We will not be intimidated.

Here's the note:
Several concerned citizens of the growing group of Iowans against Agenda 21 and The Tomorrow Plan attended a meeting for the Tomorrow Plan at Blank Park Zoo last evening.  We insisted they answer our questions and were not quiet about it.  In an attempt to intimidate us, Angela Connelly, who declared herself "an elected official" and that "they were not there to answer questions" called the Des Moines Police and THREE (3) cruisers showed up.  I don't believe anybody from our group even stood up during this Q and A attempt.  We did, however, comprise the majority of the room.

They insist this plan is NOT Agenda 21, but please peruse the attached article Sustainability Scan posted on their website.  When confronted with this article, Todd Ashby, Executive Director of the MPO, claimed to have no idea the article existed.  

When asked how much of the $2.2 million "grant" Boston firm Sasaki Associates receives, after several attempts to avoid the question, Todd Ashby finally admitted they receive 60%.  When pressed, Angela Connelly made the distinction that while there was a bidding process, Sasaki was "selected" not that they had "won the bid."  When asked about the additional funding of $1 million, Bethany Willcoxon and Todd Ashby, again after several attempts to not answer the question, admitted that while this money is not directly given to them, these funds come from Capital Crossroads, who apparently is funded by area businesses(?), and another entity I am unable to recall at this time, (maybe DART?) who receives tax money from cities in the planning area - specifically mentioning Ankeny.  Where I come from, we call that "splitting hairs."
1 Comment
 
 
No matter where you go in our country and in Canada, and in Australia, and across the world, you'll see the same regional plans rolled out.  Regional plans are the stepping stone to Mega-Regions and then on to One World.  There are those who like the idea.  Let's see how much they like it when they realize that they're not the chosen ones after all, and that the noose will tighten on free speech, free movement, and freedom.  When you stand up to object in a visioning meeting you're brushed off as a fringe, isolated contrarian--yes that's what they say.  But the consultants and your government have no problem packing that meeting with their own employees and partners and having those people represent the millions of people in the 'region' who have no idea that these meetings are going on.  Yes, that's the buy-in, and no dissent is permitted.  

The government is getting that fiat money as fast as possible from the Federal Reserve and sinking you ever deeper in debt.  But there's always money for that $50 million bike path or the new stadium 'for economic growth.'  Yet you'll hear that this is the age of the New Frugality.  That's what the American Planning Association calls it.

Now that the American Planning Association has held their 'Communications Boot Camp' for planners they'll tell you that smart growth (now they call it quality growth) is all about the economy.  Here's what they say now: 'Planning is pivotal to the return of American prosperity and economic strength.'  They also say 'Planners are the guardians of the future.'  

Does that make you feel all warm and fuzzy?  What do they say about us?  They advise planners to 'cultivate elected officials and 'influentials' who can push back.'  
They also advise keeping elected officials briefed and inoculated--that's the word they use--against our arguments and facts.  They subject the elected officials to pressure and plant articles in the newspaper about them if they don't go along to get along.

Shame and embarrassment, and threats of job loss, peer pressure, reprisals. They'll shame you and embarrass you in those visioning meetings; that's the way Communitarianism works. They'll try to make you feel ashamed or frightened of what people will say.  But you won't be intimidated. Then they'll want to bring the police into their meetings so that we don't disrupt them.  We have many ways to break the stranglehold--here is one:

The Tennessee legislature is about to pass a bill (it passed in the House) that will call a halt to this officially.  Like the Republican National Committee's resolution, it repudiates UN Agenda 21 and ICLEI.  The bill was sponsored by Rep. Kevin Brooks, a Republican.  It passed with 8 Democrats joining in.  The Senate counterpart bill is sponsored by Senator Mike Bell.  Let's be sure to thank those elected officials who have the courage to brave ridicule and disinformation in order to bring UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development out of the shadows and into the light.  To begin that hard task of breaking its grip on every city, county, and state in the nation.  

We can do it.  We're getting stronger every day, and it's because you are speaking out.  Thank you--keep it up.


Add Comment
 
 
Every town is doing these creek trails, bike trails, rails to trails, etc.  These are impossible to police, negatively impact bordering properties' potential for controlling their borders and ensuring their privacy, and actually create security issues.  Maintenance is expensive--many of these trails will add tens of miles of public space to formerly private areas.  Many are paved, this is costly and gives contracts to cronies.  Not to mention that they are disturbing wildlife---going into areas that were previously quiet habitat.  These areas are now open to bikers, hikers, and transients.  Crime by transients, gangs etc will make people demand more policing, and then there will be more police presence in your backyard.  These plans have prohibitions on solid fencing along the trail.  No solid wood fence---it violates the 'viewshed' into your backyard.  Will Google take a golf cart down these trails and photograph your back yard?  Why are these trails paved?  Is it so that a small vehicle will be able to go on them?  So that a police vehicle can surveil you?  This is not for the people.  Not for the animals.  It is for surveillance.

Exercise is the new god and the green mask.  It creates justification for more surveillance and more dogma...this will result in required exercise in order to keep health care costs down.  Just think of the implications. Obesity epidemic. Healthy Eating Active Living.  Blue Zones and all of the other programs nationwide will be required when mandatory health insurance takes effect.  See our page on One World One Vision 2050 for more.
1 Comment
 
 
Just in case you've been in a cave for the last few years and haven't heard about this let me fill you in.

The human genome has been 'mapped.'  That means that lots of DNA has been collected from humans and identified.  So what?  According to the Council for Responsible Genetics:
More likely, however, even broader monopolies may be given to those who have already patented genes or will do so soon. The human genome project has made clear that corporations that have already claimed genes as their own have, in fact, laid claim to a higher percentage of the entire human genome than they at first realized. Looking at the four leading private companies who patent genes, about 750 human genes have been patented by them so far and applications for about 20,000 more are pending. In the case that the pending patents are all awarded (which is unlikely, as many will prove to be redundant), those four private companies could own half of the human genome.  

OK, so what? you ask.

Well, the latest thing is to spit into a cup and send it off to be analyzed at a lab---23 AND ME---so that you can find out your ancestry.  It sucks at that.  For instance it can tell you that you have Eastern European ancestry, maybe drop a little bomb in your life if you turn out to have had a Jewish ancestor and that surprises you for some reason.  But so what?  Oh, you want to know if you're going to die of heart disease at a young age?  You want to know if you have a genetic disease and shouldn't breed?

Now, this post goes real well with one I did a couple of days ago--one about the Nazis.  The Nazis did experiments with human beings and also were terribly concerned, obsessed, with eugenics.  Eugenics was the study of race and involved identification of different racial characteristics in order to purge the world of the inferior races.  

Back to today.  When all of this focus on ancestry started up in the 90's I was very concerned about it.  Suddenly everyone was on-line posting their family tree and researching their history.  Very nice.  And convenient.  The Nazis had to do all of that work on their own.  Now you're doing it for them.  

Who owns 23 AND ME?  Anne Wojcicki.  Who?  The wife of Sergey Brin.  Who?  The founder and owner of GOOGLE.  Google is heavily invested in 23 AND ME. What does 23 AND ME do with your data?  They keep it.  Store it.  Analyze it.  Inventory and control.  Remember?  What is UN Agenda 21?  It inventories and controls everything.  Including you.  What will they do with it?  Whatever they want.
12 Comments
 
 
This morning on CSPAN's Washington Journal interview and call-in program the guest was discussing the economic situation in the US and Europe.  A caller called in and asked the guest about UN Agenda 21.  The caller asked what the US was going to do about it, and how we are going to fight it.  He talked about the Republican National Committee's resolution against UN Agenda 21 and the fact that the RNC had acknowledged the existence of and danger of UN Agenda 21.

The host asked the guest if he was up on the topic, the guest said no, and they moved on.  

This is exactly what you should be doing.  CALL IN to every talk show.  SPEAK OUT.  Encourage your fellow free people to speak the truth and demand renunciation of UN Agenda 21 from your elected officials.  Let's get this in front of every American.  TODAY.

Add Comment
 
 
You may have been hearing about Property Rights Councils lately---these are the supposed answer to UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development intrusions into private property rights.

I am against them.  

Property Rights Councils are being pushed as a way to 'help' the property owner assert her/his property rights before an elected board by having the property owner first state their 'case' before an unelected board: the Property Rights Council.

As if we hadn't learned our lesson with other unelected boards and commissions designed to push us further and further away from elected officials who have to answer to us, this Property Rights Council is supposed to magically represent us and defend our rights to our city council or county board of supervisors.  

A sort of priesthood interceding between the common man (you) and the holy board (elected officials).

Yes, the idea is that your board of supervisors, the one that won't listen to you now, will appoint this group of learned property rights advocates who will listen to your tale of woe, about how you're being ripped off by your city or county or state or feds, and will opine on your rights.  They will solicit an opinion from the Cato Institute or some other 'think tank' and then pass that along to your council or commissioners.

WHERE DO I START?  First of all, if your elected officials would be willing to appoint such a board IT WOULDN'T BE NECESSARY.  Because if your elected officials were listening to you and respecting your private property rights they wouldn't need a board to tell them to listen to you and respect your private property rights.  Right?

And this unelected board---they're going to get an opinion from whom?  The Cato Institute?  Says who?  What about 6 months from now when the council changes and they go to the Natural Resources Defense Council for the opinion on your rights?  Oh, you think it's going to be a requirement that some particular group give the opinions on your property rights?  NO WAY.  

And what about the Constitution, anyway?  And the body of law?  Why would you want to run through the gauntlet of yet another unelected board that's going to play favorites, winners and losers, with your rights?  Who will be picked to be on this board?  How much is it going to cost you in time and 'white papers' to get your rights?  Who says you'll get them from this unelected board?
Who are the big-money corporate interests behind the Property Rights Councils?  Are they the big property owners in Idaho who don't want fishermen walking the streams (a right that is granted to all fishermen regardless of whose property they are on)?  Is it just another game where you end up losing and the fight to stop UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development is sidetracked?   

What is wrong with us?  Why do we look to someone else to 'fix things' for us?  THERE IS NO SILVER BULLET.

Your government is being run by planning departments whose staff has been trained by the American Planning Association.  Demand your rights.  Demand that planning consultants be de-funded.  Demand that your elected officials purge your General/Comprehensive Plans of ICLEI's influence and the Sustainable Development policies pushed by the American Planning Association.  

Don't expect this to be easy.  'These are the times that try men's souls.  The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from service to his country.  But he that stands it now deserves the love and thanks of man and woman.'  Thomas Paine, American Crisis, 1776

Stand strong.  Support each other.  Withdraw your financial support from non-profits, corporations, and individuals who advance UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development.  Educate yourself and others.  Kick ICLEI Out.  Dump elected officials who ignore your concerns and violate your rights. Don't expect someone else to do this for you.  You are in service to your country.  STEP UP.




1 Comment
 
 

I just received this in my email and it's wonderful to see citizens empowering themselves to assist their elected officials in resisting UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development.  Click here to see their resolution, which is a variation on the resolution passed by the Republican National Committee a couple of months ago.  Here's the email:

***Date: Tuesday, March 13, 2012, 11:25 PM
I went to my Town Council meeting tonight and presented them with a copy of the Ocean County New Jersey Freeholders Resolution to oppose Agenda 21.   Our new Republican Mayor was taken back by it.  He said to me..."I know exactly what Agenda 21 is.  I can't believe I didn't hear about this."  I handed him a copy.  He immediately told the Council he wants to pass the same thing for our town and he proceeded to ask for a roll call for those in favor.  2 new Council members said they would have to abstain because they were unfamiliar with the details of Agenda 21.  Meanwhile the Mayor was shaking his head yes, yes...this is good...we need to pass it.  Then he told the Town Clerk to read the Freeholders Resolution out loud.  She did...and all the time the Mayor and 4 other Council members are shaking their head in approval.  Then they voted again.  It passed with ALL in favor....and now Berkeley Township is now officially OPPOSING AGENDA 21.  I, of course will get a written copy of that.  I was blown away.  I thanked every one of them.

I'm not even sure what this FULLY means...I mean...how far can they push this?  Every single thing related to Agenda 21 is opposed?  I'm sure they will specify in their own Resolution.

Too Cool!!!  I'm a happy camper this evening!
Ocean County CITIZENS For FREEDOM
Moving Forward!!
***


See that?  It's your fellow citizens fighting back against UN Agenda 21 by educating themselves and their elected officials.  You can do it too.  Take this on---it's up to YOU!
1 Comment
 
 
Just got this email from a friend in the Houston area. 
 
I am so PISSED tonight…we went to another regional planning meeting and since they now are worried about us they had sheriffs there and would only let county residents speak even though their plan covers 13 counties…UGH

They stacked the meeting tonight with officials from H-GAC, Political Figures and Facilitators…it was a complete sham…UGH

Yes, more and more often you will see police and sheriffs in the room when you go to speak.  Are they so afraid that this largely middle aged, middle class group of citizens will get crazy, or are they there to intimidate us and let us know that we shouldn't dare to speak out?  At the meeting in San Carlos, CA that some of us attended recently (a KICK ICLEI OUT meeting) there was a K-9 officer.  Yes, he had a dog in the car---just in case.   Still having trouble convincing your friends and neighbors that there's a problem?  Tell them that your town council and other government agencies are bringing in armed men to keep you in line in case you SPEAK UP.  

IS THIS THE WAR ON TERROR OR THE TERRORIZING WAR?  THE WAR ON TERROR IS A WAR ON YOU.  The National Defense Authorization Act has identified most of us as the enemy.  Use your liberty while you have it.

STOP UN AGENDA 21/SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT.

1 Comment
 
 
We regularly receive emails that ask why the site is called Democrats Against UN Agenda 21 instead of Americans or Humans or Patriots.  Sometimes they're rude, but today I received a nice one:

Ms. Rosa Koire, I heard you on Alex Jones this week and last week. Your message is timely. I'm glad that Alex Jones had you on as a guest. I hope you become a regular. I'm going to buy your book this week and look forward to reading the information and educating myself and then to others. I have a suggestion. Do you have another website other than www.DemocratsAgainstUNAgenda21.com that has the same content? I'm not a Democrat and I'm open to your site however in passing out flyers it would be helpful to direct people who are in a different political group to your information without any labels ie Democrat or Republican. Maybe a neutral like humans or citizens. This is not a criticism email what's so ever, I appreciate your knowledge and message. Thank you for what you are doing. I would like to join you in spreading this message out. 

So what is the reason why we identify as Democrats?  Besides the fact that we are life-long Democrats, I felt that it was important to speak out AS A DEMOCRAT in the exposure of UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development precisely because so few Democrats were joining with their Libertarian, Republican, and Tea Party friends and neighbors in this struggle for our freedom.  This struggle is painted as a right wing, fringe issue--and that is wrong.  It is a propaganda technique used to silence dissent.  'Marginalize the opposition, neutralize and convert.'  

That kind of pressure usually works. But it's not working anymore, and this website is a clear bold notification to those who would steal our freedom that party affiliation is no guarantee that we will stand by weakly, and go along to get along.  It is vital that we look past these minor divisions, this Hegelian dialectic that creates a difference where there should be unity.  

We invite you to stand with us, and we make that invitation as Democrats.  Democrats who are conscious and are able to see clearly.  Democrats who see what is happening to their party. Democrats who understand that this is a struggle to reassert and rescue our freedom from this administrative coup d'etat.  Don't be afraid to join with Democrats--celebrate our allegiance to our nation by breaking those artificial boundaries.  

We need to work together as Americans.
3 Comments