Trouble viewing the video? Click here
No, this isn't to pick on the Episcopalian Church --- the Church is obviously fully supporting UN Agenda 21 openly. The question is: Are you an Episcopalian? Did you know that your church is actively working to implement UN Agenda 21? Your church is in the BUSINESS of implementing UN Agenda 21.
Trouble viewing the video? Click here
When you go to church or synagogue you may hear something like this:
All beings are God's creation and all people on earth are entitled to peace and freedom from want.
But listen closely and you might hear something like this Eco-Justice info from the Episcopal Church (click to read):
"The Episcopal Church's Office of Global Relations supports the United Nations as it works towards global, collective ecological responsibility. In 1992 earth leaders assembled for an Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil and created the Rio Declaration which became known as Agenda 21. It called for balance between the economic, social, and environmental needs of present and future generations.
In 2006, The Episcopal Church's General Convention declared the United Nations Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) to be the top mission priority of The Episcopal Church. The ONE Episcopalian Campaign represents a partnership between The Episcopal Church and the ONE Campaign, striving together to end extreme global poverty and achieve the eight MDGs set by the United Nations and affirmed by every nation in the world."
In 2006, the Episcopal Church launched a partnership with the ONE Campaign. The ONE Campaign is committed to ending global poverty through implementation of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). In 2000, leaders from around the world committed to eight goals designed to target the world’s poorest. These goals address hunger, universal primary education, gender equality, child mortality, HIV/AIDS, and clean water. The eighth goal, global partnership, ensures that the MDGs are a cooperative effort among all nations. 2015 is the target date for completion of the MDGs.
ONE Episcopalian allows individuals and congregations to take action and address the needs of the world’s poor. Just as there are countless problems associated with poverty, there are also countless solutions. ONE Episcopalian members can educate their friends, families, and fellow worshippers on issues related to global poverty. They can call, write, and visit their representatives in Congress when MDG-related bills are considered. Prayer vigils, marches, and fundraisers can mobilize their community around an issue. The opportunities available through ONE Episcopalian are limitless, but the time is not.
The target date for the Millennium Development Goals is fast approaching, and there is still so much work to be done. Join with fellow Episcopalians around the world in eradicating extreme global poverty. Join ONE Episcopalian today!"
IS YOUR CHURCH SUPPORTING UN AGENDA 21?
DO YOU SIT QUIETLY WHILE YOUR PASTOR OR RABBI PREACHES AGENDA 21?
ARE YOU GOING TO SPEAK OUT OR WILL YOU JUST QUIT YOUR CHURCH? OR WILL YOU GO ALONG?
BE THE RESISTANCE. DO IT NOW.
Every time you listen to the news or read the paper you'll see UN Agenda 21. Every conversation you have, every dinner, every coffee break, every meeting--you'll hear people spouting UN Agenda 21 platitudes, often without being aware of it. At school meetings, at teacher's meetings, at management meetings, you'll hear the same slogans. What do you do? Do you sit quietly? Do you worry that you'll be made fun of or not listened to if you inform them of the truth?
What do you think will happen as the time progresses and the programs in your schools, in your planning departments, in your offices, and your legal departments become more solid? Don't you think it will be come more difficult to block these plans as time goes on?
What are you doing to stop it? Are you telling yourself that it's too late? Are you thinking that you're just one voice? Isn't there more that you can do? Can you talk? Can you write? Can you refuse to cooperate? Can you stop wasting time on popular culture and start taking a few minutes a day to be a free human being?
Here's a guy who receives emails regularly from the Democratic Party requesting donations. What he did might seem funny but it's something. SPEAK UP. DO IT WHERE IT COUNTS: WHERE PEOPLE CAN HEAR YOU OR READ YOUR WORDS. Call in to Washington Journal on CSPAN. Call in to talk radio. Distribute flyers. Speak out in public. Stand up. RESIST.
HERE'S THE EMAIL EXCHANGE BETWEEN JOE BIDEN AND A CONSTITUENT:
From: Joe Biden [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: September 29, 2014 11:10 AM
Subject: I have a lot of respect for you
When you chip in $3 or whatever contribution you're able to make, you put your own hard-earned money on the line and you vouch for Barack and me. You vouch for Democrats across the country, and the things we've done and will do to help the middle class. I can't tell you how much that means to both of us.
Tomorrow night we're facing our biggest and final FEC quarterly fundraising deadline before Election Day.
So chip in $3 or more right now.
If you've saved your payment information, your donation will go through immediately.
QUICK DONATE: $3
QUICK DONATE: $10
QUICK DONATE: $25
QUICK DONATE: $50
QUICK DONATE: $100
Or donate another amount:
I have a lot of respect for you, and I know you understand how important this is.
How can you have any respect for me? This is an absolutely incredibly stupid comment! You have no idea who I am, you are simply peddling Bull that you hope sounds nice to me! Our World will never get better until People like you and Obama stop peddling Lies and Fraud!
You see, I believe you two do not give a Hoot for any American! The Public means nothing to the both of you except at Voting Times!!
You are globalists. Democrats, Republicans--all alike with your global plan for domination and control. We will not cooperate.
I'm on my way out but wanted to repost this article from Bloomberg News (and what a funny joke that is, but to continue) offering yet more proof that your suspicions that the Fed regulators purposely looked the other way when shown the truth about how Goldman Sachs et al were operating in 2008 and during the run up to the crash. The banks / investment corps controlled the Federal regulators. Period. To listen to the NPR 'This American Life' insider interview click here.
This kind of behavior, this failure of government to regulate, this collapse in our government's duty to protect us, is symptomatic of the progress of UN Agenda 21. A collapsed economy in a developed nation furthers the goals of UN Agenda 21 to create dependence on government subsidies and mega-corporations. Private property ownership was turned upside down. Small businesses were destroyed. Pensions were lost. Jobs were lost. Homes were lost. Families were lost. THIS IS THE PLAN.
Read this and then talk about UN Agenda 21 with your friends, family, colleagues---YOU CAN DO IT.
REFUSE TO BE MANIPULATED.
FREEZE THIS MOMENT IN YOUR MIND AND LEARN.
THIS IS WHAT UN AGENDA 21 LOOKS LIKE.
Listen to This American Life on NPR to hear the report and interviews.
From our friend Debbie Bacigalupi---she traveled to Atlanta and got a photo of Ted Turner's portrait in the lobby of his office building. It's a revealing look at the mind of a globalist. We've searched the internet and haven't found this anywhere.
Here's Debbie's comment:
Painting of Depopulation Terrible Ted Turner in the lobby of his Captain Planet, Turner Foundation, Ted Restaurant, Turner Building with his residence at the top looking at CNN Center (another Ted Turner property).
Location: 133 LUCKIE Street Atlanta. UNLUCKY if you ask me.
Below is my FB post ... but I see I missed some detail... like how his backside is reddish...like burning....and the UN flag pole goes straight to his brain. Is his green jacket supposed to represent the Amazon...is there a monkey in his sleeve just below the sailboat in his chest? It's hard to tell. On his shoulder, is that some kind of military symbol? See how the sail boat kind of makes a tie for his chest? Why does his hand look so funny? What else is there?
THIS PICTURE SAYS IT ALL and I've never seen it before!! The way the security guard treated me for taking it also says it all!! Check out the details:
+You can see the UN and Global Governance is clearly at the center of Ted's eye.
+Ted obviously views himself as some god-like figure over the world.
+Ted sees himself as presidential at the same time.
+In his face in the clouds, you can see on the right hand side the outline of North America and South America to represent earth, the globe.
+Ted obviously believes in merging the nations as the flags overlap.
+In the palm of his hand, the UN and US flagpoles rest … separated but at the top, where he seems omnipresent, the flags merge.
+Are those chem trails or vapor trails ???
+He's wearing green.
Do you see anything else?
I'm so bummed I didn't get a better shot…The security guard got HOTLANTA mad at me when I took this photo with my cell phone. This photo was in the lobby of his building. At the top of his building, where he lives, are three flags. The one on the far right is a faded United Nations flag.
He is dubbed the largest land owner in America…but he doesn't believe in private property for you and me. Global Governance is clearly at the center of Ted's eye.
ATLANTA … home of Ted Turner and his conglomerate (CNN, HLN, TBS, Turner Foundation, Captain Planet, Turner University, Turner Athletic Club, one of his many Ted's Restaurants (where he can serve meat and it's not considered global warming) and more).
Blind adherence to a party or an ideology in the face of evidence that it is furthering a suicidal future is madness. So, yes, I am a liberal; Yes, I am a registered Democrat (since 1974); Yes, I realize that parties are a manipulation and distraction; and NO, I do not support President Obama's purported plan to violate the constitution.
New York Times August 27, 2014: "The Obama administration is working to forge a sweeping international climate change agreement to compel nations to cut their planet-warming fossil fuel emissions, but without ratification from Congress." click to read more--you should.
This article breathlessly describes how the President of the United States will broker a 'hybrid agreement' a new invention, called 'legal and political magic' by the Natural Resources Defense Council. The agreement would help avert the disaster of climate change and is the last chance to avert catastrophe according to the New York Times. In June Obama issued an Executive Order to command restrictions on energy and is being sued by some states.
Here's another quote from the article:
"American negotiators are instead homing in on a hybrid agreement — a proposal to blend legally binding conditions from an existing 1992 treaty with new voluntary pledges. The mix would create a deal that would update the treaty, and thus, negotiators say, not require a new vote of ratification."
In 1992 at the UN Earth Summit in Rio there were two treaties up for ratification: the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Framework Convention on Climate Change. The United States Senate did not approve the Convention on Biological Diversity after seeing that it would restrict human beings into islands of human habitation. Of course that is slowly happening anyway as a result of ICLEI members curcumventing the treaty process. The Framework Convention on Climate Change was signed by G.H.W. Bush and was approved by the Senate in October 1992, but it is considered 'not legally binding' because it does not set emission limits or have enforcement powers in place. There are no 'legally binding conditions from an existing 1992 treaty" that the US agreed to--it simply doesn't exist. Who will be 'compelled' to reduce emissions?
The US did not agree to the Kyoto Protocols, which were the follow-up to the 1992 Framework Convention on Climate Change. Will this 'legal and political magic' ensnare us in a treaty to which we did not agree?
Did the New York Times get it wrong? What's going on? How can the US 'update' an existing treaty? What is the legality of 'updating' a treaty which would effectively change the document to something that had not been agreed to previously? This is an extremely important question that goes far beyond the panic of Climate Change (we must avert disaster, no time to ask questions, you denier, you). Can any President of the United States change any document, amend any agreement, agree to something that requires the consent of Congress without going to Congress? The Congress is YOU.
When the US agrees to a treaty it overrides existing US law.
The US Constitution on the subject of treaties:
"Article II: [The President] shall have power, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to make treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur.
"Article VI: This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding."
Before you get on your high horse about saving the planet look at what is behind the green mask. This is not a left / right issue. This is GLOBALIZATION.
One thing I'm grateful for on this 11th day of September 2014, thirteen years after, is that more and more people question what they read in the press and what they hear from 'officials.' More and more people are discerning, doubting, sharing information, and refusing to be manipulated. This is important progress.
We are becoming more courageous, more willing to do our research, and more likely to speak out about what we've uncovered. The threats and shame of being referred to as a 'denier' or a 'truther' or a tin-foil hat or a black helicopter person or any number of devices used to deter us from refusing to accept whatever storyline is trotted out for us, have failed to stop us.
I encourage you to stand fast when you know the truth and add to your body of knowledge. The more you know the stronger you are. Whether you're researching EPA restrictions or 9/11 or Sustainable Development or ICLEI or NDAA, Common Core, regionalization---the fulfillment of the new world order---whatever your focus you are adding to the strength of millions when you share your information and insights. Every one of us has a duty and responsibility to ourselves and to our liberty to follow the truth fearlessly. This can be depressing or frightening, but it can also be tremendously exhilarating and freeing. Read, research, listen, and use your individual mind to establish for yourself how you wish to live.
REFUSE TO COLLABORATE
THE WAR ON TERROR IS A WAR ON YOU.
Common Core is an integral part of UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development: globalization is the standardization of systems. Whether the system is law enforcement or land use or government, the standardization, harmonization, and integration of all international methods of management is essential for total control.
Education is the flash point for embedding system acceptance in all sectors of the population. Standardized propaganda is developed for pre-kindergarten to post graduate school; this is what is meant by 'Life Long Learning.'
Breaking down traditional methods of learning in order to re-socialize the populace is the goal. Obedient, dependent people who are constantly being propagandized will provide the 'human capital' to fully implement UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development.
Regardless of the content of this nationalized and internationalized system of behavioral modification, the goal and outcome will be to fundamentally destroy the individual's rights.
This is commonly referred to as 'Transformation' or 'Change'.
HERE ARE SOME RECENT COMMENTS FROM YOUR ALLIES ACROSS THE WORLD. YOU ARE NOT ALONE. THE RESISTANCE IS GROWING:
I want to let you know that here in Loreto, BCS Mexico, where we have a UNESCO marine park, we are about to be merged in a "Sister Park" program with Channel Islands National Park. The environmental organization that I resigned from in disgust almost four years ago is facilitating this and setting the stage for our endgame. Our way of life as a fishing village is at risk now. Yesterday a member of the NGO (eco alianza de Loreto) phoned me in a panic because he has been a big donor and now understands the manipulation. He called me to warn me what's in store for us in the fishing industry here so that I may warn my compañeros. Unfortunately there is very little information in Español available to the people and these treaties and agreements are being made in a language that is NOT spanish. Everything legally binding in Mexico MUST be in spanish, its the law. Here is the link for what I am talking about and after that I am adding the link in español. Notice how the español version is totally lacking information and that most of the pdf that is linked off the spanish page, is in English! http://ecoalianzaloreto.org/newsroom.html
spanish http://ecoalianzaloreto.org/espanol/noticias.html Right now I am busy working but this afternoon I will bring in one very well respected fisherman and I'll show him what I see from my computer display. He is my neighbor. Then tomorrow I will do the same with another fisherman who is equally well respected. I will give both the translated version of the "delphi method" document (I translated from your website, thank you!). and then we'll take it from there. Thank you for your information and for continuing to fight the fight!
I am in Calgary Alberta. After I read your book I realized how deep the City of Calgary as well as the small cities and towns surrounding Calgary are involved and already implementing UN Agenda 21. What amazes me is the level of ignorance there is understanding the consequences of its implementation.
Hello from Alaska, I've read the book cover to cover. The information has inspired me to do more. My recent information gathering and ground work has stirred up growing interest in my good neighbors. They are wanting to do more "now" as group. I've been encouraging them to do as I, and research (gather survey and easement documentation) and be proactive themselves, as to educate themselves prior to engaging anyone out side of our small coffee group. Our rural community has been overwhelmed by ski, bike, and real-estate d groups developing state land and implementing their agenda of smart growth while trying to eradicate our rights to the same state lands. The neighborhood doesn't like it but the community has embraced it? The community council is in the final stages of adopting a "comprehensive plan" developed by the guidance of the Fishook community council board and the Mat-su borough personnel.
This A21 mess is EVERYWHERE! Here in Dublin, they've ripped out the last flat parking areas at our Dublin BART Station and are preparing to slam in more stack and pack housing! There was a TV ad on our cable the other day (all expensive animation) that showed the future of Dublin with stack and pack low rise buildings lining Dublin Blvd as far as you can see. Who paid for that ad? I also met a School Teacher yesterday who teaches in the east bay. The first thing I ask any teacher is how do you like common core. This person rolled their eyes and then said how much they hated it. I then asked if they knew about Agenda 21. They said they'd never heard of it... I told them to get on the internet and get up to speed. I shared your book and info with a friend up in Oregon. They said they'd already "Dieted" their downtown roads for millions of dollars. When they started the project, studies had documented only an average of 10 bicyclists on the inner city roads, a day! At our kids school, one of our teachers told me I was the only parent aware of the origins of CCSS and the poison it was to the future generation of US citizens. (If we're still a country when they graduate) Thank you for all your efforts to stop the A21, and One Bay Area train wreck!
Who can I contact in Los Angeles County about attending the Agenda 21 Delphi meetings and working against Agenda 21 in my county? I live in Los Angeles.
Rosa, I'm watching you on Open Mind Conference in 2013 Denmark, and I must say, you have to come to Brazil, just for a cup of coffee. Everything you say about Agenda 21 explains so much of what I feel here - I live in "nowhere" by the way, outside São Paulo, an hour away - and it is invisible, as Agenda 21 must be. I asked the owner of a local store, here at nowhere, about some seeds he had for sale - where do they come from? Are they Monsanto seeds? Etc, and he said just "Gee, I don't know, we buy them from Agroceres I guess, don't know". No one knows anything and yet everything you say sounds incredibly "Brazilian", or "Neo-Brazilian". No one knows Agenda 21 exists, no one has a clue - and no one cares, but I smell it everywhere. So I wanted to ask you if you know about Agenda 21 in Brazil, at least where I could find real info about it. All I see is "how wonderfull sustainable development is". Imagine, a Brazilian asking an American about information on Brazil. Well, this is typically Brazilian. Brazil, I am quite sure, is the most Agenda 21 obedient country on Earth. I can't prove it but I'm sure of that. This must be the model country - maybe that's why this monstrosity was signed in Rio, no less. I'm a musician and I even did a record called "Agenda 21", a jazz record, but somehow it was put aside by the people at the studio, probably because you know, these conspircay things, not good. Self censorship, auto-indoctrination, obedience, alienation, illusion, fake, common good, you will find all that and much more here in abundance. In fact, every "conspiracy" video I watch and see how much Americans are becoming outraged by what is going on in the US (the police state etc), to me it sounds like "duh, this is how Brazil works since I was born". Which, incidentally, was 1964, not an insignificant year in Brazil's history. Ok, I just felt I had to say something and ask you about Brazil. If you have time, of course. Many many many congratulations on your work, it's truly hero stuff. Bravo. And thank you. In the 80s-90s I started smelling something very wrong happening, some "change", something "new". Working with music for advertising I suddenly had to do "new" stuff, modern, cool, something was changing, people's expressions, new looks, something was in the air, globalization etc, but of course I was only called paranoid and negative. You helped me understand finally what this "change" has been, or at least an important part of it, these global changes that were picked up by my intuition, so thank you very much.
I'm in Massachusetts probably hopeless down here but any advice or information might be helpful, people look at me like I have two heads when I talk about it
First of all, thank you. I recently joined the city planning commission of my small hometown in the Pacific Northwest. Agenda 21 is alive and voraciously enticing and brainwashing my fellow Americans. I now understand thanks to your book the grand journey I will be undertaking by thwarting the plans of globalist funded, unelected, "regional councils". I hope to be in contact with you in the future and look forward to a bright future.
First of all, let me say thank you for all that you have done, and continue to do to educate people about Agenda 21! I have bought and handed out numerous copies of your book, "Behind the Green Mask."
I live in Wyoming County of western New York State which, unfortuantely, is now home to 308 industrial wind turbines. We were able to stop them from putting up the 2,000+ wind turbines that they originally intended to blanket the entire County with, but it's been a decade long battle! As you well know - useless, sprawling wind factories are part and parcel of Agenda 21 - just a huge land grab geared at driving people out of the countrysides!
I just wanted to update you on what Governor Cuomo is now doing. NY Gov. Cuomo's $Billion Dollar ratepayer-funded 'sun initiative' is in addition to the $Billion Dollar "Green Bank" he already instituted. And all of this following the passage of his "Power NY Act 2011," which removed New York State municipalities long-hel "Home Rule" regarding the siting of energy facilities over 25 MW (obviously designed to aid & abet the siting of sprawling wind factories.) Unfortunately, most politicians are completely energy-illiterate and buy into the "green" BS.
Most disturbing is Governor Cuomo's recent press release (pasted below): GOVERNOR CUOMO ANNOUNCES FUNDAMENTAL SHIFT IN UTILITY REGULATION Governor Cuomo Announces Historic Commitment to Solar Power: http://www.governor.ny.gov/press/04242014-solar-power
Governor Cuomo Announces Historic Commitment to Solar Power | Governor Andrew M. Cuomo $1 Billion Commitment to NY-Sun to Support Widescale Private Investment in New York’s Solar Industry Albany, NY (April 24, 2014)
READ MORE ON OUR COMMENTS PAGE--CLICK
REFUSE TO COOPERATE.
When you're reading these 5 questions and imagining what the 'answers' would be (if anyone answers you) be sure to stretch this to fit situations where you're in the Planning Department of your city, or in a Visioning meeting about changes to the center of your town, or at a Climate Action Plan meeting. Standardization is being blanketed across all elements of our interaction with local government. The following post does not just apply to education and control of students. Continuous assessment of behavior and use applies to energy, law enforcement, business management, land use, government projects, and health care.
Here's a recent post from Charlotte Iserbyt's blog page
Five Magic Questions
Enable Parents to Debate the Issues
In 1996 Anita Hoge devised and distributed widely the following useful tool for parents’ groups to use in testimony before state legislatures and local school boards. The questions reveal the disturbing psychological aspect of assessment testing and curriculum being given to children. It is alarming when one considers that the State has defined the criteria upon which these affective standards will be scored, and assigned a passing or fail grade, and will prescribe remediation in order to get the child to measure up to State-defined par.
These questions are still current and pertinent to Common Core, etc. They serve as an excellent educational tool to equip parents with the right questions they can ask the next time disturbing things begin to happen to their children and their schools. The text of the pamphlet is reproduced below in its entirety:
FIVE MAGIC QUESTIONS
ENABLE PARENTS TO DEBATE THE ISSUES
Education regulations or laws state which standards or outcomes your child needs to meet to graduate. Many of the outcomes are vague and subjective. Look at the verbs. This shows why these outcomes are impossible to measure objectively. An example under a category like “Citizenship” states, “All students will negotiate and cooperate with others.” The Five Magic Questions parents can use to win the debate when outcomes reflect subjective or vague areas are:
1. How do you measure that outcome? If an outcome states that “all children must have ethical judgment, honesty, or integrity,” what exactly is going to be measured? How do you measure a bias in a child in order for him to graduate? Must children be diagnosed? Will they be graded by observation or pencil or paper tests? How will performance or behavior be addressed?
2. How is that outcome scored or what is the standard? What behavior is “Appropriate” and to what degree? For example, how much self-esteem is too much or not enough to graduate? Can government score the attitudes and values of its citizens?
3. Who decides what that standard will be? The state has extended their mandated graduation requirements or exit outcomes down to the individual child. This bypasses all local autonomy. What about locally elected school directors? Will they become obsolete? Are we talking about a state or government diploma?
4. How will my child be remediated? What are you going to do to my children to change them from here to there in their attitudes and values in order to graduate? How do you remediate ethical judgment, decision-making, interpersonal skills, environmental attitudes? What techniques will be used? What risks are involved? What justification does the state have to change my children’s attitudes?
5. What if parent and state disagree on the standard or how it is measured in the classroom? Who has the ultimate authority over the child? What about privacy? Can parents opt out of a graduation requirement of the state?
All children must meet the same fixed standard of “future citizen” or not graduate, go to college, or get a job. Your child is human capital. This is why the state wants control of the graduation requirement—and that is why local school boards must create policy to stop the state from exerting power over elected officials. Ask this question: Do you want equity in opportunity, or do you want equity in standards?
Watch Anita B. Hoge discuss "The End Game of Assessment" on YouTube:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jc_G5GmigkY. This post is reproduced with some minor alteration from pp. 367-368 of the deliberate dumbing down of america.
Shaw Granted Injunction Against Alameda County in Billboard Battle!
FOR IMMEDIATE DISTRIBUTION
Citizens for Free Speech Granted Injunction Against Alameda County as I-580 Billboards are Protected by Federal Court
Castro Valley, August 5, 2014 – On Tuesday August 5 Michael Shaw and Jeff Herson of Citizens for Free Speech (Citizens) obtained a court injunction against Alameda County's objection to the construction of three 2-sided billboards along I-580 in Castro Valley, California.
The court ruled against the County and declared, "The Zoning Ordinance Gives Officials Too Much Discretion in Approving or Disapproving Signs Based on Their Content."
Michael Shaw, co-founder of Citizens poses this question: “Is the Alameda County Board of Supervisors trying to hide ABAG, ICLEI, and One Bay Area from the citizens?”
We are proud to be partners with Michael Shaw and Freedom Advocates in the lawsuit to stop Plan Bay Area.
If you've been reading this column lately you've seen the latest media attack on those of us who are exposing UN Agenda 21. The press seems really bothered that I'm a liberal, and journalists work as hard as they can to try and 'trip me' into identifying with the right.
In the past, as a liberal I had always seen conservatives as a monolithic group---idolizers of Reagan and Ford and Bush and lockstep followers of Gingrich and Rove. A few years ago I had my awakening at Charlotte Iserbyt's gathering of dedicated education researchers and activists.
This was a group of conservatives but I quickly discovered that I had
a very shallow understanding of what that term meant to them. What I heard was criticism of the establishment right. Vocal, articulate,
deeply reasoned and heavily footnoted research into the corruption and manipulation perpetrated on us by the very people that I would have expected this group to support.
I was wrong.
I listened eagerly to scathing criticism of the Heritage Foundation, the Reagan administration, the Republican party, and the Bushes. Links from the neo-cons to big money and influence, to the collapse of our economy, our education, and our nation were exposed.
It was tremendously exciting to have my preconceived expectations shattered by such a stellar collection of truthtellers. I found myself thinking 'if only I could find a group of liberals who were willing to
deconstruct the Congressional Progressive Caucus, or the Tides
Foundation, or the Clintons and Obama'... it really takes guts to ask
the hard questions and to follow all leads without concern that your
little heart might be broken.
We're all adults. It takes an adult to deal with reality. Mommy's not going to come along and spoonfeed you or rescue you. What else is more important than resurrecting your liberty? Party loyalty? You must be kidding. Yourself.
Here is a series of expose articles about the right by Kelleigh
Nelson, a religious conservative who knows her stuff. Just in case
you're bothered by News with Views, I suggest that you read the
articles and take in the information rather than let the mainstream
mega-corporate owned media bias you before you read a word. That's business as usual. You're stronger than that.
Quislings, Propaganda and the Big Lie: Climate Change!!!
The march to global fascism wouldn’t be possible without journalists who won’t write about it, but who do write hit pieces on those who oppose it. David Morris is one such journalist. He recently wrote an article for Fortune.com titled, Agenda 21: Global Conspiracy or Climate Savior? The article attempts to answer the question: Are grassroots opponents of sustainable planning being silenced by international power . . . or have they marginalized themselves? Inherent in the title and the question, he reveals the bias of the article.
Morris chose to interview Rosa Koire, well-known anti-Agenda 21 activist to represent the opponents to the ‘global conspiracy’ side. To balance the article, he quotes Michael Schmitz, Executive Director of the U.S. chapter of ICLEI, Mark Potok for the Southern Poverty Law Center, Arthur C. Dyas, Chairman of the Baldwin County Planning and Zoning Commission as the attack dogs against Agenda 21 opponents. For good measure, he threw in the Koch Brothers and ALEC – the American Legislative Exchange Council with the innuendo that they are funding the anti-Agenda 21 movement. That’s a joke because the only “grassroots” groups that have any money are the supporters of Agenda 21 or who are leaders of the opposition – well-funded shills.
Fortunately, Rosa records all of her interviews and this one was no exception. It is posted on youtube and I recommend watching it – not for the lame arguments of the SS (Supporting Stooges) that Morris quotes but as a study in the manufacture of propaganda. This article is 1385 words long. After 896 words attacking opponents of Agenda 21, he finally got around to giving faint praise to Rosa – followed immediately by the implication that she’s just paranoid:
“In contrast to that nuanced picture of influence, Agenda 21’s opponents assert direct lines of connection among agencies and governments, with the United Nations at the center. This is what makes talking to Rosa Koire both beguiling and confounding. She’s cogent and detailed as she critiques the elite international influence that has promoted sustainable development through commissions, councils, and nonprofits. It’s a deeply American anxiety that goes back at least to George Washington’s farewell admonition against foreign entanglements.
But Koire and her allies frequently make dramatic leaps in describing how that influence works..."
“nuanced picture of influence”. Don’t you love that? Agenda 21 supporters and implementers would like us to believe that memes fly through the air like St. Valentine’s arrows piercing the walls of the bureaucrats to turn them into government central-planning clones to save planet earth from [sound effects please]... CLIMATE CHANGE!!!
On the recorded interview, David Morris stumbled his way through this important question:
"You’ve obviously seriously done your homework on all of this stuff ... but what I’m wondering is how you feel about [unintelligible] .. some people in this debate have a little less knowledge of the details of how these things happen (Agenda 21) and you do sometimes get a sense that people believe that there is some central force that is kind of dictating all of this stuff because what you described is a process where the idea is spread around and influence is spread around and people from the top down are coming to an agreement on what they think people should do and not everybody agreed with that. But there are certainly people who think that right now, sitting in the United Nations building somewhere there are five guys sitting around telling the President what to do..."
To start, there is the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) – advisors to the Executive Branch and the EPA. The CEQ was created by the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 for that purpose and the Office of International Affairs within the EPA was created in 1970. The name is slightly different now, but the environmental movement has always been international.
There are probably three who are most important at this point. That would be the North American Commission for Environmental Cooperation (CEC). They were created as a result of two treaties – one with Mexico and one with Canada.
U.S.-Mexico Cooperation on Environmental Issues signed at La Paz, Baja California, 1983. TIAS 10827.
Agreement between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of Canada Concerning the Transboundary Movement of Hazardous Waste, signed in 1986 – recognizing international environmental law. TIAS 11099
Both Agreements (Treaties) annexed to the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).
Plus other treaties and other bi- and multilateral environmental agreements with countries around the globe which can be found here at the Ecolex website and the process by which environmental law is adopted, here at the United Nations Environment Programme website in the section called Montevideo Programme.
An honest analysis of the organizational structure, combined with the treaties and agreements, combined with the otherwise inexplicable actions contrary to the U.S. Constitution, U.S. statutory law, the complete left turn away from traditional American cultural heritage and values, the professional facilitation meetings to phony up “consensus” for land use plans that are clones of plans being implemented all over the world.... and gee whiz... it sure looks like a global conspiracy to this Idaho girl.
We are being ramrodded into an international system of totalitarian control using the steaming pile of bovine excrement labeled [sound effects please] CLIMATE CHANGE!!! And what is really annoying to them is that a few of us refuse to ‘go along to get along’. And that’s where people like David Morris come in. His job is to discredit the opposition. That’s what he tried – and failed to do with his interview with Rosa. She’s not discredited. He is.
There is a name for people like David Morris - quisling. “A quisling is a person who collaborates with an enemy occupying force. The word originates from the Norwegian war-time leader Vidkun Quisling who was the head of a collaborationist regime in Norway during the Second World War”.
June 23, 2014