The following was just posted by our good friend, researcher Vicky Davis at www.channelingreality.com.  We're sharing it with you here because there are some very important points to be learned from Russian President Vladimir Putin's State of the Union address.   All world leaders are globalists now, or will be.  Health care is being used as a way to experiment on and collect data on all human beings using biometrics and genomics.  Mandatory health 'care' will ensure that no one escapes the net.  The message is the same whether you're in Russia, or the United States, or the EU, or fill-in-the-blank.  


Remember:  UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development is the action plan to inventory and control all human beings and resources in the world.

Here's Vicky:
I just finished listening to Vladimir Putin's Address on the State of the Russian Federation.  With just the slightest bit of tweeking , Putin's Address could have been given by Barack Obama or George W. Bush.  The programs are the same.  The solutions are the same.  The agenda is the same.  Putin is a clone putting forth the global technocratic agenda and the centrally planned, university driven "innovation" economy.  In one area however, he was more direct with the Russian people than American politicians are.  
 
Putin's speech is now posted on C-Span.  I can't stress enough how important it is for you to listen to it just so that you know for yourself that his agenda for Russia is the same agenda as here. 
 
Russian State of the Union Address with President Vladimir Putin
December 12, 2013
Program ID:  316776-1
Category:  International Telecasts
Format:  Speech
http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/Addressw
 
I also found a printed copy of the speech from a website address given on the screen.  There is a brief summary first but after that is the actual text of Putin's speech. 
 
http://www.eng.kremlin.ru/news/6402    
 
The cloned health care agenda from the text of his speech: 
 
"Health care -
In recent years, we have been able to achieve a great deal in the healthcare sector. Life expectancy has gone up. Mortality from cardiovascular and many other types of diseases has gone down. However, we are still far from our target indicators.
 
The big question that remains is a realistic approach to the insurance principle in healthcare. Today, the function of mandatory health insurance is essentially to “pump money” to the recipient through the extrabudgetary fund rather than the budget. The objective is entirely different. The objective is for the insurance principle to work as an incentive for people to take responsibility for their health, to have financial incentives to live a healthy lifestyle, and for insurance companies to be interested in medical institutions providing high-quality services, so that a patient finally has the opportunity to select the medical institution that, in his or her opinion, works best.
 
The mandatory health insurance system should fully financially cover state guarantees for providing free medical assistance. This applies equally to the total spending volume and directing funding to a specific hospital or clinic. At the same time, the patient should clearly understand which healthcare services he or
she is entitled to receive free of charge, and the doctor should understand the principles upon which his or her work is paid.
 
Particular emphasis should be placed on developing a preventive treatment system. Beginning in 2015, all children and teenagers must have a yearly mandatory free medical check-up, while adults should undergo such an examination every three years.
 
Clearly, there will be an increase in disease detection during routine medical examinations, and the need for high-tech medical care will grow. In recent years, we have created a whole network of federal centres, supporting ones that are located in major cities, but also creating a new federal network of centres capable of providing medical assistance at the most advanced level. We need to maintain and develop
their potential. At the same time, services at these centres must be accessible not just to the residents of the cities where they are located, but also residents of other regions. We must provide the necessary financial resources for that.
 
On the whole, over the next three years, we must create the conditions to perform 50% more high-tech operations than today. This is an entirely achievable goal. At the same time, we cannot fall behind the global trends. Leading nations already stand at the threshold of implementing medical technologies built on bio- and genetic engineering, based on the human genome sequence. This will truly revolutionise medicine. I believe that the Healthcare Ministry and the Russian Academy of Sciences should make fundamental and applied medical research a priority."---above is text from Vladimir Putin's State of the Union Address to Russia.
 
Of course he is talking about the Global Health system and he is telling you that the global priority is bio and genetic engineering... and that APPLIED MEDICAL RESEARCH   is a priority. 
 
The crimes against humanity will be no less---simply because the leaders of countries have become clones for the globalist agenda and they will all be co-conspirators.  If anything, it should scare the hell out of you.   It does me. 

READ MORE AT www.ChannelingReality.com

This group, United Cities and Local Governments, says it represents half the population of the world but you've never heard of it.



So what could this mean?  The fourth pillar of UN Agenda 21 is CULTURE.  Think about some of what we're seeing around the world:

Across the United States, the indigenous people, Indians, are opening casinos.   Indians are considered a sovereign nation within US borders but receive federal funds and assistance.  Tribal heads who were not elected by tribe members are running the tribes like dictatorships and dis-enrolling members of their tribes who dare to challenge the ruling establishment of tribal councils.  By the stroke of a pen an Indian becomes a non-Indian.

Cultural events often take place in rural areas, but less and less people are able to survive in their traditional rural towns. Regulations, restrictions, and outright prohibitions on timbering, fishing, ranching, and other rural pursuits has left an indelible mark on 'cultural' America.  If you're not indigenous you lose your right to work your land.

The emphasis on tourism has relegated culture in many places around the world to folk dances and ethnic meals provided for the consumption of outsiders.  Economies in some areas are dependent on the entertainment of these consumers of culture, and town centers are turned into pseudo-museums for their pleasure.  Often authentic members of these areas are unable to afford their own 'culture' or find it to be commercialized into a caricature of the past.  The preservation of these living museums may mean that anything that isn't scenic has to go away, even it means economic collapse.

Culture may be defined as modern dance and art learned and produced in a university setting with all of the requirements that academia demands. Analyzing the creation becomes the culture itself.

New rights are being granted: positive rights.  Positive rights can be taken away or granted, unlike the rights we have guaranteed by the United States Constitution.  Our constitutional rights are those we are born with, they can't be taken away or granted by a government -- just protected by it. UN Agenda 21 'rights' are really privileges designed as rewards and punishments. 


Discrimination will extend to anything which acknowledges difference, but only when it is being done by others.  You'll be a 'hater' if you note unfair advantage, manipulation, or discrimination against the traditional mainstream.  Culture is something to be used as a tool in the manipulation of demographics. The emphasis on diversity, on empowering women and youth, and the poor, and others formerly less attended to by society means that culture is defined by the 'other' rather than by those who live it.  It is externalized, commercialized, romanticized, and politicized for the benefit of the elitist consumer while the exploitation of the social group is carpeted over in green.  

When you contemplate what culture is, you'll find yourself reflecting on agricultural, rural values; you'll think about nature and the seasons and crops; you'll think about longtime communities of friends and family; you'll think about religion and ritual; you'll contemplate courtship and marriage, and childbirth, and death.  Culture is the human being's journey through life and beyond.  

United Nations' Agenda 21 is a sham imitation of this.  It is the green mask of concern for the continuation of life covering a goal of pushing humans into urban islands of human habitation.  This densely urban life of stress and economic deprivation is 'the new poverty' or the new austerity that redefines the individual's relationship to his/her government.  UN Agenda 21 empowers the regional unit, whether it's in the Americas (example: Cascadia) or Europe (Danube Region: Centrope) over the nation and its manageable, responsive units.  We are becoming hapless targets of the Mega-Corporations in their rush to exploit a moveable workforce taught whatever corporations need us to know in order to produce their widgets.  Huge corporations sell you what they tell you you want, and you buy it.  Smart Phone? Tracking device with built-in GPS.  Video Games?  Sociopathic training designed to develop action without introspection.  ATT or Comcast Home Security?  In home video surveillance.  
This is your culture now.

Merry Christmas. 
CULTURE IS THE FOURTH PILLAR OF UN AGENDA 21. 
Refuse to cooperate.
Expose collaborators. 
RESIST. 

We spent the day at Terezin concentration camp just 40 miles from Prague, Czech Republic today.  Terezin was an existing town that had been used as a garrison and prison for hundreds of years -complete with a moat and fortifications--when the Nazis chose to use it as a collection center for Jews from all over Central Europe in 1941.  Existing residents of the town were relocated so that the entire fortified town could be used to house Jews prior to their further transfer to the work and murder 'camps'.

What makes Terezin unique among concentration camps is that it was a 'show' camp.  In order to hide the truth---that Jews were being murdered---Nazis perpetuated the lie that they were being relocated to new towns where they would be happy and able to live wonderful ives far from the disapproving eyes of others.  

People in Austria, Denmark, the Netherlands, Hungary, Moldavia, Czechoslovakia, and Germany had been prepared for the isolation of their Jewish neighbors by the Nazi restrictions on the Jews' daily interactions.  At first Jews were restricted to shopping just two hours a day, could not do business for more than a couple of hours a day, could not date a non-Jew, could not marry or do business with a non-Jew...as they were squeezed out of the normal transactions of life, the Jews were seen more as 'the other' and less as 'the neighbor.'  It was easy to identify them because Jews were forced to wear a yellow cloth star with the word Jew written on it pinned to every article of clothing.  

Yes, you say, impatiently.  Yes, I know all of that.   So what?  What does this have to do with Agenda 21?

Collection centers were used to concentrate Jews into central areas of Europe so that they could be moved more easily to the murder locations.

The Nazis never told them where they were going, never told the world what they were doing, never admitted to it.  As long as there was uncertainty about the purpose of the concentration camps the Nazis could continue to move populations without panicking them.  People who were being relocated, Jews, could believe that they were just being taken to a new town or work site where they would be treated decently, and there would be no need to fight against the relocation.  Why not go peacefully and with dignity?

By the time they knew what the true destination was it was too late.

The Nazis were clever.  They made propaganda films at Terezin, the concentration camp.  They used famous Jewish film directors who were prisoners, famous actors, musicians, and designers to make these films in order to fool the world.  They even remodeled some of the rooms at Terezin to make them look more pleasant, for the cameras.  These rooms were opened when the Red Cross came to inspect, and then closed again when they left.  In fact, when the Nazis knew that the Red Cross was coming they planted flowers and trees, and fed the children and provided services for the adults---but just for the time before and during the Red Cross visits.  Afterwards the Jews were taken to be murdered.

So what is the point?

Governments lie.  Is Smart Growth just another name for a collection center?  It is a concentration center for populations.  We don't know what these centers will be used for in the future.  Restricting our mobility, setting up trains, increasing surveillance, monitoring our energy usage, watching our children, tracking our movements, our purchases, our healthcare, our education...ratcheting up the restrictions.  This is Sustainable Development.

On this day, September 11, 2013, the president of the United States is advocating for the invasion of yet another country.  What is your government capable of?  Will the next targeted group be those who refuse to cooperate?  

Read the following carefully.  It is the blueprint for the disintegration of established systems, and you are seeing it all around you, now.  This article is specifically about the educational system but it applies to every aspect of our cultural, political, economic, and environmental systems.  Second order changes are in progress right now, and that is why nothing seems to make sense.

From Charlotte Thomson Iserbyt, author of The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America

THE 1990–91 (WINTER) ISSUE OF OUTCOMES, an educational journal devoted to discussion of Outcome-Based Education and the problems associated with its implementation (teachers’, administrators’ and community resistance) published a remarkable article entitled “Paradigm Change: More Magic than Logic” by John C. Hillary.
The reader should remember that the manipulation of classroom teachers and administrators discussed in this article is standard operating procedure in most schools undergoing “restructuring.” 

Excerpts from Hillary’s article in Outcomes follow:
The deeper changes that frustrate leaders and threaten followers are planned second-order changes.... These changes intentionally challenge widely shared assumptions, disintegrate the context of “organization” and, in general, reframe the social system. This, in turn, generates widespread ambiguity, discontinuity, anxiety, frustration, confusion, paranoia, cynicism and anger as well as temporary dysfunction. Such trauma often builds to the point that leaders abandon their efforts.

The most disruptive changes—second order changes—on the other hand, call into question the entire context of organization. Such multidimensional changes not only challenge the content of each domain but also disrupt the alignment among them. Paradigm change is therefore not only traumatic in and of itself, but also challenges other attributes and disintegrates the relationship among all domains. The eventual outcome of such change is “transformed” or “renewed” organization.

The new vision for schooling suggested by contemporary educators represents a significant “second order” challenge to school organization.
The leader of planned second order change will be regarded as out of context by the organization. If he thinks and behaves in accord with a vision that
requires second order changes, he has no choice but to violate or challenge the established culture, mission/purpose, and paradigm of the organization.
From the existing frame of reference, such behavior will be seen as illogical. Powerful and pervasive psycho-social forces will bear down on the renegade in a relentless organizational effort to bring him back into alignment. Unless the leader succeeds in progressively bending the pervasive frame, persistence is increasingly risky.

During second order change, the organization must face and hopefully pass through a period of widespread psychological ambiguity, social disconnectedness and general confusion....The requisite disintegration of the existing culture, mission/purpose, and paradigm disrupts the organization’s frame of reference.  During this time, there is little or no clear and consistent context to guide the thinking and behavior of members. In social systems, this condition produces dysfunction, anxiety, frustration, disequilibrium, and systemic chaos.

The instigator of second order change must consistently behave in ways that will not make sense when framed by the existing context. With time and leadership, the organization environment must move from initially and
naturally selecting against the innovation to selecting for the innovation.
 
The extinction of the old way of doing business is the desired outcome. Hence and with time, the risk should gradually shift away from the innovator and toward those who persist in holding on to “the way it’s always been.”