Blog Archives

How come nobody asked me if I wanted to pay dues to ICLEI?

4/28/2011

Because they didn't have to. That's right. When your city or county (or both) became a member of International Council on Environmental Initiatives-Sustainable Development there was no need to ask for your permission.
Is your town a member? CLICK HERE TO FIND OUT
But remember--even if you don't see your community on that list you are still being influenced by programs, grants, trainings and plans funded and designed by ICLEI.

Take a look at the list on the left and go to
ICLEI: When they say local they mean it

ICLEI is the implementation arm of UN Agenda 21. ICLEI fuels the fear.
ICLEI pressures the community.
ICLEI sets the goals.
ICLEI measures the progress.
KICK ICLEI OUT.
Kick ICLEI out of Chattanooga, Fayetteville, Decorah, Amherst, Lincoln, Omaha, Cloverdale, Fullerton, Oberlin, Tulsa and YOUR TOWN

1 Comment

Carroll County Maryland kicks ICLEI out!

4/24/2011

0 Comments

Carroll County Press Release:
Westminster, Maryland January 19, 2011. The Carroll County Board of Commissioners recently voted to withdraw their membership from the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI). Members of the Board cited differences between sustainability and good environmental stewardship as the basis for their decision.

Commissioner Richard Rothschild has been vocal in his belief the sustainability movement as advocated by the ICLEI invokes government power to enforce activists’ views of environmentalism. “It merges environmentalism and socialism to expand government into too many aspects of our lives, including food production; transportation; housing; manufacturing; and energy.” Of greatest concern, it replaces farmers’, ranchers’, and landowners’ concept of land stewardship with government-centric control.”

Commissioner Robin Frazier agrees, “ ICLEI’s pro Agenda-21 movement advocates socialist policies that choke us to death with regulations; destroy our job-base; sap individual creativity; and steal our ever diminishing freedoms.”

Recent articles written about sustainability have questioned the goals of the movement and their relationship to environmental protection. In recent discussions, the Board of County Commissioners has decided the two are not aligned.

Board President Doug Howard expressed similar concerns. “I support measures to protect our environment, but I believe the ICLEI’s vision is incompatible with the rights and freedoms of our citizens.”

0 Comments

Why can't you be more positive?

4/23/2011

1 Comment

Well, we're about as positive as you can be that Sustainable Development is the green mask for suffocating freedom. When we speak with other liberal-identified people they either make a joke of UN Agenda 21 ('Hey how serious can it be if it was started in 1992 and I've never heard of it?'), or completely deny the existence of it and suggest that maybe we're crazy and paranoid.

It can be frustrating to have to restate that the reason they've never heard about it is because it is purposely hidden. Purposely. Hidden. Now if you're a rational person you might have the attitude that if something existed your benevolent government would tell you about it and give you a chance to vote on it. But this is the USA. Your government has done many things without your knowledge or agreement, and has denied it. For instance?

The Iran-Contra connection. Your government financed a secret war in Nicaragua by shipping guns to Iran and giving the money to the Contra rebels in Nicaragua in exchange for drugs (cocaine) which the CIA then sold to gangs in South Central Los Angeles. Congressional investigations revealed the truth, though Oliver North lied under oath.

2000 Presidential Election. The ballot boxes in Florida were removed by Republican party operatives, police cars were posted by the polls in black neighborhoods to discourage blacks from voting, the Republican party purged the voter rolls of 'felons' who were not felons. Go ahead, call us partisan. We're not. This is a fact.

Surplus government arsenals were sold out of the Redstone Arsenal, Alabama, and Mena, Arkansas, to Third World army officers. This practice was being conducted while Bill Clinton was governor of Arkansas. It's probably still going on. Go ahead, call us partisan. This is a fact.

Do we have to say 'weapons of mass destruction?' How about 'yellow cake uranium?'

We could keep going. The point is that you don't get asked to vote on covert activities in your government. Treaties and agreements, like United Nations Agenda 21, the Agenda for the 21st Century, are made and you won't hear about it. Maybe there's a presidential signing statement that can supercede the Congress, or maybe that isn't even necessary.

Does it concern you that the President's Council on Sustainable Development gave a one million dollar grant to the American Planning Association in 1993 to draw up the legislative guidebook used to change every General Plan in the nation to bring it into compliance with UN Agenda 21?

Just because you didn't notice, does that mean it hasn't happened? If it's in the paper in the second section on page 3 on one day in the year were you informed? If the county held 15 meetings on the formation of the General Plan (with full compliance with UN Agenda 21) and you stayed home and watched TV or went to 15 meetings where they never mentioned Agenda 21 does that mean that it didn't happen? If you don't put all of the different restrictions, regulations, and propaganda movies, books, radio, magazines and TV together, does that mean it's not happening?

The irony is that UN Agenda 21 mandates more citizen involvement but does it by creating so many boards, commissions, regional agencies, non-profits, meetings, and programs that it is impossible to stay on top of what is happening. So we become, necessarily, more fragmented, less of a community, exhausted and isolated because we can't keep up. The so-called citizen involvement is dictated by phony neighborhood groups with paid lobbyists and facilitators running them. The boards and commissions are chosen based on 'team players' or shills selected to push through an end game by running over the few actual unconnected citizens on them. These groups are the 'pre-screening' groups for candidates for public office. They are the ones who get donations at election time. It's doubtful that anyone will get on the ballot who doesn't play ball. Then we're told that WE came up with the new regulations.

We're too burnt out to fight on more than one issue. We may be victimized by our government regulations but since it's done one project/property/business at a time we seldom get the chance to join together. Or we may be afraid that we'll be targeted by government, local groups, or the newspaper if we stand up. The less of us who own small businesses and private property, the less of us who care or notice when un-just decisions are made. So a crashed economy where we lose our homes and businesses supports UN Agenda 21.

Sustainable Development and Communitarianism are being imposed on you through UN Agenda 21 funded programs. NOW.

Actually we couldn't be more positive. How about you?

1 Comment

Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain

4/21/2011

0 Comments

You never hear about Agenda 21/Sustainable Development on Conservative Radio. You never hear about it on Liberal Radio either. You don't see it on FOX. You don't see it on MSNBC.
They won't talk about it.
Republicans and Democrats won't break the silence. They're both in favor of it. Four presidents supported it. Two Bushes, Clinton and Obama.
When we bring it up we either are called conspiracy theorists, or told that it doesn't exist.
But it does. And they know it. So it's a race now. You're in it. The race to expose it. To educate your friends, business associates, relatives, and neighbors---get the word out. People know that something is happening but they can't put a name on it, and they may not realize that it is all connected.
But you do.
So familiarize yourself with Communitarianism. It's the political philosophy behind all of this. It states that the individual's rights are a threat to the global community. Everyone is an individual, so we are all a threat to the global community. Our rights to property ownership, to personal mobility and life choices, to feed and clothe ourselves, are a danger to the global community. So we must be rationed. We must be controlled. We must be watched. We must be regulated, restricted, and balanced. Our individual rights must be balanced against those unnamed rights granted to the world community by the United Nations, as codified by Agenda 21/Sustainable Development.

Communitarianism is based on a paradigm: A problem is created. A solution is proposed. Struggle between the 'two sides' produces an outcome that is a 'third way'. This so-called Third Way would never have been agreed to except that now it is called a solution to a problem. That didn't exist. And now the 'solution' is the new 'normal.'

Corporatocracy. Government by corporation. Public/private partnerships. Tax credits to corporations. Non-profits that are also corporations but have a green face. Doesn't matter what political party they profess to support, they take turns funding both sides.

It's UN Agenda 21. Administered in your town by directives, funding, and training by ICLEI and its many partners.

Kick ICLEI out of Fort Collins. Kick ICLEI out of Sonoma County. Kick ICLEI out of Savannah, Sitka, Phoenix, Spartanburg, Sioux Falls, Peoria, Chicago, North Miami, Dayton, Austin, Richmond, Salt Lake City, Middletown, Cortland. Get up, go out, and tell your neighbors.

CITIZEN, TAKE BACK YOUR CITY.

0 Comments

Shut up and sit down--no one wants to hear what you have to say

4/19/2011

0 Comments

Our city, Santa Rosa, California, stopped broadcasting the Public Comments portion of the City Council meetings on public television last year. Yes, the screen went dark right as names were called to speak, and an announcement came on the screen saying that the televised portion of the public meeting was now concluded. We protested. We sent letters to the Mayor and council, and to the local newspaper. The response was that the city didn't owe anyone a venue to express their views. They said that if people wanted to hear what other citizens had to say they could come down and listen in person. Since the city had gone to 'action minutes' for all of their meetings in 2005, you could no longer read the minutes and know what had been said. Merely your name was recorded.

We checked the internet to see if other communities have censored their public comments. We were shocked.

This is not the only city restricting its citizens right to speak and be heard. NO. It's happening all over the United States. Everywhere. Town councils and boards of supervisors are not broadcasting public comments on their public television stations any longer. Is this a coincidence? NO.

THIS IS UN AGENDA 21.

Go and demand that your city broadcast your comments on public television with the rest of the council meeting. Bring everyone you can to the meeting and speak for your three minutes--keep your council and supervisors there all night. Every meeting. Until they restore your public comments portion of the meeting to the televised program.

What's the major difference between the US and repressive regimes? Tolerance of dissent. Free speech. Open discourse. Public debate.

Without information we are in the dark. Kept in the dark. Censored. BY UN AGENDA 21/SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND ICLEI.

Some of the cities that have censored public comment include:
Compton, CA
Hutchinson, MN
Stafford, NJ
Santa Rosa, CA
Bartlesville, OK
Gary, IN

0 Comments

Carbon dioxide and you: Holding your breath

4/19/2011

0 Comments

Your community has been committed to reducing your carbon dioxide/greenhouse gas emissions. You've been committed by your local government in response to requirements by your state. Under orders by ICLEI and Sustainable Development. You are now REQUIRED to reduce your 'greenhouse gas emissions'.

In our county, Sonoma County, northern California, the government has committed to reducing our carbon dioxide output by 25% below 1990 levels by 2015. Four years from now.

Here's the obvious question: When were our carbon dioxide emissions at 25% below 1990 levels? What year? You can't find that info. Anywhere. How many people were in the county at that time? Don't know since we don't know the year, but the county population has grown since 1990. So if we're talking about per capita reductions and we don't know what the population was at the time that we were supposedly at 25% below 1990, this goal will place us at a greater percentage than a reduction of 25% on a per capita basis.

It's about control. The county doesn't even know what year it's trying to go back to. The county wasn't measuring 'greenhouse gases' back in the 80's. Or the 70's. But their goals will put our farming, our industry, our energy usage, our businesses, our production, and our livelihoods, back at some level in the past. That is just a number to some people, but we don't know what the consequences will be. What impact will this have on our food production? On your ability to work and continue to be financially independent? Will we be so restricted and regulated that we become totally dependent on the government for our food, housing, and income? Then what? Will we be living in smartgrowth slums? Traveling on buses routed only where we are permitted to go? Eating packaged food impregnated with chemicals?

This is the result of policy makers trying to outdo one another, and agencies acting regionally to try and comply with state and federal mandates orchestrated by ICLEI. You are required to comply. The goal is more important than your life.

WHAT HAPPENS IF WE DON'T MEET THEIR GOALS?
2009 COUNTYWIDE GHG EMISSIONS INVENTORY
Sonoma County’s GHG emissions in 1990: 3.6 million metric tons carbon dioxide (CO2)
Goal of 25% below the 1990 level: 2.7 million metric tons carbon dioxide (CO2)
Sonoma County’s GHG emissions in 2009: 4.28 million metric tons carbon dioxide (CO2)
Source: Sonoma County Water Agency
http://www.sctainfo.org/data.htm

If this were enacted in 2009 it would have required a 36.92% reduction in emissions. So what's next? If you can't meet their goals? FINES. And if you can't pay your fines? Tax liens. And if you can't pay your tax lien? Confiscation of property.

Did you know? The UK and most of the US has committed to reducing greenhouse gas emissions to 80% below 1990 levels by 2050. Imagine that.

0 Comments

We really are Liberals--no kidding

4/19/2011

2 Comments

We received the following letter and you'll find our response below it.

Dear Democrats Against Agenda 21
I was impressed by the volume and content of information available on your site. On reading your "preamble" though I was disturbed to see your "support" for pro-choice and pro-gay rights. Are you aware these issues are Agenda 21 related in that they both lead to population reduction which may not seem obvious at first glance, but that IS Agenda 21's goal. (50 million abortions since Roe vs Wade)and (Children rarely emanate from gay relationships)
The other issue which may be none of my business,(But an observation) is the splits which may occur when breaking away from the main focus of your site that being "UN Agenda 21" which I'm sure you'll agree would fall right into the Globalists famous trap of infiltration.

Your comments regarding pro-choice and pro-gay rights are interesting. Of course I know that population reduction is a vital part of Agenda 21. However, it is not my duty to have children, although I could have had them at any time over a 20 year period. As a gay person I want and expect to have the same rights and responsibilities that non-gay people have in America. Right now I am penalized by the federal government and most state governments in regards to inheritance laws, state and federal taxes, and approximately 135 other benefits given to non-gay married couples. As a woman I expect to have control over my body and not have the state interfere with my personal choices. That is Communitarianism. Dictating personal behavior is not the role of the state.

I am a liberal identified person who voted as a Democrat for over 30 years. I marched in anti-war demonstations, in pro-gay rights demonstrations, headed up pro-choice groups, advocated for women's rights, and now I am speaking and writing nationally against Agenda 21. I appreciate that others may not share my views regarding my personal choices, but I hope that you understand that dictating a certain point of view regarding morality is counterproductive to the freedom that we advocate as Americans. Life, liberty, and property...your most essential property is that of your own person.

Here's the basic issue: We want to be free to choose. We're not trying to get you to be gay or have an abortion. We want to be free to control our own bodies. You are free to be straight and have as many babies as you wish. And by the way, lesbians and gay men are having children in unprecedented numbers now. Adoption is an option as well as are alternative methods of conception.

We encourage you to recognize Communitarianism in your thinking, even when you'd like to be able to legislate against my personal choices. We can do better than that in America.

Let's not let our minor differences separate us when we are struggling to shed light on and stop UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development. Thank you.

2 Comments

How come nobody asked me if I wanted to pay dues to ICLEI?

Carroll County Maryland kicks ICLEI out!

Why can't you be more positive?

Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain

Shut up and sit down--no one wants to hear what you have to say

Carbon dioxide and you: Holding your breath

We really are Liberals--no kidding

And the winner is...

Archives

Categories