DEMOCRATS AGAINST U.N. AGENDA 21
  • VIDEOS
  • The way we see it...Our blog
  • OK, So what is Agenda 21? And why should I care? Part 1
    • Help, I'm going to a council meeting
  • VP Joe Biden and the New World Order
  • BUY BEHIND THE GREEN MASK
    • BEHIND THE GREEN MASK: KINDLE & NOOK
  • ONE WORLD ONE VISION 2050
    • VIDEO AND SMEAR ARTICLES
  • FLYERS
  • WHAT CAN I DO?
  • WHO FUNDS UN AGENDA 21?
  • LAWSUIT AGAINST A21
  • COMMON CORE IS AGENDA 21
  • YOUR COMMENTS
  • DEVELOPING A WINNING STRATEGY
    • How Have We Resisted Agenda 21?
  • Invite Rosa to speak!
  • GREAT SOURCE INFO
  • ICLEI: When they say local they mean it
    • ICLEI - USA MEMBER LIST
  • Sustainable Development Article
  • SMART METERS
  • ALERT: 'OCCUPY, THE SOURCE'
  • Government Tricks: The latest
  • Donate/Contact Us
  • About Us

Fun with statistics...Delphi IN ACTION

5/1/2012

 
This is a fun one.  A survey made March 12-30, 2012, by Yale and George Mason Universities asked this question:

How much do you support or oppose signing an international treaty that requires the United States to cut its emissions of carbon dioxide 90% by 2050?

They asked 1,008 people.  First I'll tell you what the Center for American Progress (an ICLEI supporter and partner in UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development) reported as the 'result.'

The Center for American Progress reported that 65% of the respondents supported this REQUIRED huge reduction in US carbon dioxide by 2050.  

Now I'll tell you what the data showed.  Nineteen percent strongly supported this international treaty concept.  The other forty six percent 'somewhat' supported it.  But it was reported as 'support.'

Now I'll tell you what the title of this article  is: The Death of Public Support for Global Warming Action Is Greatly Exaggerated.  Interesting, right?  This article is designed as spin. 

Another survey question asks, in a Delphi-style way, "People disagree on whether the US should reduce greenhouse gas emissions on its own, or make reductions only if other countries do too.  Which of the statements comes closest to your own point of view?"  And then the question answers are ranged from the US should do it without influence by other countries or it should follow the lead of other countries.  Do you see the Delphi?  They set this up so that if you don't know anything about this you'll just want to see the US make 'independent decisions' not influenced by other countries and you'll 'vote' for that.  And, predictably, 63% of respondents did just that when they said they wanted the US to reduce its GHG regardless of what other countries do.  They didn't question the whole premise in the first place did they?

This is classic Delphi.  Be aware.
NewportMac
5/1/2012 03:11:29 am

Good catch but its common to all Climate Science surveys. The question design is pitiful, the survey analysis misleading, and the survey response statistics tell the whole story but require the reader to find them/are missing from the conclusions.

Example: only 8% response to a survey yet they claim 70% support some notion.

for more on Yale and George Mason University polls:
Why the Yale and George Mason University poll attempt to tie “extreme weather” to global warming is rubbish

source: http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/04/18/why-the-yale-and-george-mason-university-poll-attempt-to-tie-extreme-weather-to-global-warming-is-rubbish/

NewportMac
5/1/2012 03:28:02 am

One of the obvious issues, which has bothered me from the start, is the correlation between UN Science and Solution Work Groups. It doesn’t take a genius to immediately see the potential problem of IPCC Work Group 3 acting on the conclusions of its own Work Group 1. Throw the UNFCCC into the mix and its a nightmare.

The Rush to Judgement without proper due-diligence is beyond belief.

Has the UN has gone completely Psychotic? Is world land management even part of the UN Charter beyond a pass down of information?

It gets even worse when one realizes that Climate Science was commissioned to FIND human influence on the climate without a knowledge of how the climate system actually works. Big Fail in my opinion but to use scare tactics to sell Agenda 21 on top of it is criminal.

fun reading:
Rio+20 meets Agenda 21
Posted on February 26, 2012 by Willis Eschenbach
source: http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/02/26/rio20-meets-agenda-21/


Comments are closed.

    And the winner is...

    What is UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development?
    It is the blueprint, the comprehensive plan of action for the 21st century to inventory and control all land, all water, all plants, all minerals, all animals, all construction, all means of production, all energy, all law enforcement, all health care, all food, all education, all information, and all human beings in the world
    .

    Your energy consumption will be controlled until you can't farm, can't manufacture, can't travel, can't fish, can't use your land. Productivity and businesses are limited now.

    You've heard that story about Tony Blair asking Angela Merkel how Germany could have such a high GDP when it was such a small country.  Merkel snapped at him: We still make things in Germany, Mr. Blair.

    Archives

    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    September 2020
    July 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    October 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    November 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    June 2010
    May 2010

    Categories

    All
    Agenda Organizations
    Asset Based Community Development
    China
    Common Core
    Communitarianism
    Good News
    Grassroots Activism
    Grassroots Struggle
    Iclei
    Neighborhood Associations
    Our Story
    Redevelopment
    Regional Plans
    Smart Growth
    Smart Meters
    War On Terror

    RSS Feed


NOTE: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. Articles may be republished as long as attribution bio is included and all links remain intact. 2010-2020 COPYRIGHT ROSA KOIRE